Levels of processing is an explanatory framework which postulates that differences in memorial processing quality and/or effort affect the duration of the memory trace. Using recall (immediate, one week, two week) for connected discourse processed under three semantic and three orthographic interference conditions as well as a “normal” control, hypotheses of superior delayed recall for semantic processing conditions and “reversals” from immediate to delayed recall were tested. Results were consistent with a semantic elaboration notion, but the reversals suggested by the other studies (e. g., Pellegrino, Siegel & Dhawan) were not found to be statistically reliable. Alternative hypotheses are considered.
References
1.
AndersonR.BiddleW.On asking people questions about what they are reading. In BowerG. (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 9) New York: Academic Press, 1975.
2.
AndreT.SolaJ.Imagery, verbatim and paraphrased questions, and retention of meaningful sentences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 661–669.
3.
BaddeleyA.The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart's framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 139–152.
4.
BattigW. F.The flexibility of human memory. In CermakL. S.CraikF. I. M. (eds.) Levels of Processing in Human Memory. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.
5.
BurtonJ.BruningR. H.Interference effects on the recall of pictures, printed words and spoken words. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1981 (in press).
6.
CraikF. I. M.Depth of processing in recall and recognition. In DornicS.RabbittP. M. A. (Eds.) Attention and Performance (Vol. 6). London: Academic Press, 1978.
7.
CraikF.LockhartR.Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 671–684.
8.
CraikF.TulvingR.Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975, 104, 268–294.
9.
EysenckM. W.Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness. In CermakL.CraikF. I. M. (Eds.) Levels of Processing in Human Memory.Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.
10.
FinnP.Word frequency, information theory, and cloze performance: A transfer feature theory of processing in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 1977–78, 13, 508–537.
11.
FryE.Reading Instruction for Classroom and Clinic, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1972.
12.
GotzA.JacobyL. L.Encoding and retrieval process in long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 102 (2), 291–297.
13.
GrimesJ.The Thread of Discourse. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton and Co., 1975.
14.
GriffithD.The attentional demands of mnemonic control processes. Memory and Cognition, 1976, 4, 103–108.
15.
HydeT. S.Differential effects of effort and type of orienting task on recall and organization of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 97, 111–113.
16.
HydeT.JenkinsJ.Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 82, 472–481.
17.
KahnemanD.Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
18.
KaneJ.AndersonR.Depth of processing and interference effects in the learning and remembering of sentences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978, 70, 626–635.
19.
MeyerC. D.BransfordJ. D.FranksJ. J.Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 16, 519–533.
20.
MeyerB.Organization of Prose and its Effects on Recall. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 1975.
21.
PellegrinoJ. W.SiegelA. W.DhawanM.Differential distraction effects in short-term and long-term retention of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976, 2, 541–547.
22.
RickardsJ. P.Adjunct postquestions in text: A critical review of methods and process. Review of Educational Research, 1979, 49, 181–196.
23.
RothkopfE. Z.Some theoretical and experimental approaches to problems in written instruction. In KrumboltzJ. D. (Ed.), Learning and the Educational Process. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.
24.
SchallertD.Improving memory for prose: The relationship between depth of processing and context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976, 15, 621–632.
25.
SlameckaN.GrafP.The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomena. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978, 4, 592–604.
26.
SmithF.Understanding Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1979.
27.
TaylorB.A Comparison of Good and Poor Readers' Ability to Read for Meaning, Unpublished dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1978.
