Comprehension Monitoring,memory,and study strategies of Good and Poor Readers

Abstract

Comprehension and memory skills of fourth grade good and poor readers were compared in two studies. Their ability to monitor comprehension of difficult and anomalous information was measured in three ways; by spontaneous self-corrections during oral reading, by directed underlining of incomprehensible words and phrases, and by study behaviors. Poor readers engaged in significantly less monitoring on all three measures and this was correlated with poorer comprehension and recall scores. An additional metacognitive measure of perceived reading strategy effectiveness indicated that poor readers are often unaware of the negative influences of some strategies. The patterns of responses on the multiple measures suggest that poor readers may adopt decoding rather than meaning comprehension goals during reading and they are less accurate in applying monitoring skills towards resolving comprehension failures.

References

Brown

A. L.

Metacognitive development and reading. In Spiro

R. J.

Bruce

B. C.

Brewer

G. W. F.

(Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.

Brown

A. L.

The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In Reese

H. W.

(Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

Dewey

How we think. Boston: Heath, 1910.

Divesta

F. J.

Hayward

K. G.

Orlando

V. P.

Developmental trends in monitoring text for comprehension. Child Development, 1979, 50, 97–105.

Gibson

E. J.

Trends in perceptual development: Implications for the reading process. In Pick

(Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology, 1974, 8. 24–54.

Golinkoff

A comparison of reading comprehension processes in good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 1976, 11, 623–659.

Isakson

R. L.

Miller

J. W.

Sensitivity to syntactic and semantic cues in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 787–792.

Locke

E. Q.

A guide to effective study. New York: Springer, 1975.

Markman

E. M.

Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 1979, 50, 643–655.

10.

Myers

Paris

S. G.

Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978, 70, 680–690.

11.

Paris

S. G.

Coordination of means and goals in the development of mnemonic skills. In Orstein

(Ed.), Memory development in children. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.

12.

Paris

S. G.

Lindauer

B. B.

Constructive aspects of children's comprehension and memory. In Kail

R. V.

Hagen

J. W.

(Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.

13.

Ryan

E. B.

Identifying and remediating failures in reading comprehension: Toward an instructional approach for poor comprehension: Toward an instructional approach for poor comprehenders. In Waller

T. G.

MacKinnon

G. E.

(Eds.), Advances in reading research. New York: Academic Press, in press.

14.

Smith

Comprehension and learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1975.

15.

Stauffer

R. G.

Directed reading maturity as a cognitive process. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.

16.

Thorndike

E. L.

Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1917, 8, 323–332.

17.

Torgesen

J. K.

Memorization processes in reading-disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977, 69, 571–578.