AndersonR. C.The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise. In AndersonR. C.SpiroR. J.MontagueW. E. (Eds.), Schooling and the Acquisition of KnowledgeHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1977.
2.
BormuthJ. R.Development of readability analyses. U.S. Office of Education, Final Report, Project No.7–0052, Contract No. OEC-3–7–0700 52–0326. University of Chicago, March, 1969.
3.
CarrollJ. B.Defining language comprehension: Some speculations. In CarrollJ. B.FreedleR. O. (Eds.), Language Comprehension and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Washington, DC: Winston, 1972.
4.
FlemingJ. T.OhnmachtF. W.NilesJ. A.Effects of selected deletion strategies and contextual constraint on cloze performance. In NackeP. L. (Ed.), Diversity in mature reading: Theory and researchClemson, SC: National Reading Coherence, 1973.
5.
GoodmanY.BurkeC.Strategies in Reading. Macmillan Publishing Co., 1974.
6.
MacginitieW. H.Contextual constraints in English prose paragraphs. Journal of Psychology, 1961, 51, 121–130.
7.
MillerG. H.ColemanE. B.A set of thirty-six prose passages calibrated for complexity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior1967, 6, 851–854.
8.
OhnmachtF. W.WeaverW. W.KohlerE. T.Cloze and closure: A factorial study. Journal of Psychology, 1970, 74, 205–217.
9.
Smith-BurkeM.GingrichP. S.EagleyeD.Different effects of prior context, style, and deletion pattern on cloze comprehension. In PearsonP. D.HansenJ. (Eds.), Reading: Disciplined inquiry in process and practiceClemson, SC: National Reading Conference, 1978.