In two experiments, subjects read short passages and then took recall tests on them. One group expected and received a delayed test on each passage, and the other group expected and received an immediate test. In the delayed test condition, the delay was one minute long and was filled with a distracting task. Use of cognitive capacity during reading of the passages was measured with a secondary task technique. Inspection time and learning were also measured. Results showed that more cognitive capacity was used when subjects expected a delayed test than when they expected an immediate test, but no more time was spent reading and no more was recalled. It was concluded that subjects engaged in additional cognitive operations when they expected a delayed recall test, and these operations used cognitive capacity and were carried out in parallel with the cognitive operations associated with the other cognitive processes in reading.
References
1.
AndersonR. C.BiddleW. B.On asking people questions about what they are reading. In BowerG. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 9. New York: AcademicPress, 1975.
2.
AquinoM. R.The validity of the Miller-Coleman readability scale. Reading Research Quarterly, 1969, 4, 342–357.
3.
ArkesH. R.SchumacherG. M.GardnerE. T.Effects of orienting tasks on the retention of prose material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 536–545.
BrittonB. K.HoldredgeT. S.CurryC.WestbrookR. D.Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979, 5, 262–270.
6.
BrittonB. K.HoldredgeT. S.WestbrookR. D.CurryC.Using cognitive capacity in reading text. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1979, 48, 395–400.
7.
BrittonB. K.PihaA.DavisJ.WehausenE.Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Adjunct question effects. Memory and Cognition, 1978, 6, 266–273.
8.
BrittonB. K.WestbrookR. D.HoldredgeT. S.Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Effects of text difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978, 4, 582–591.
9.
BroadbentD. E.Perception and communication.New York: Pergamon Press, 1958.
10.
FossD. J.Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 457–462.
11.
FossD. J.LynchR. H.Jr.Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure on decision times. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 145–148.
12.
GagneE. D.Long-term retention of information following learning from prose. Review of Educational Research, 1978, 48, 629–665.
13.
GagneE. E.RothkopfE. Z.Text organization and learning goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 445–450.
14.
KahnemanD.Attention and effortEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
NormanD. A.BobrowD. G.On the analysis of performance operating characteristics. Psychological Review, 1976, 83, 508–510.
23.
PerfettiC. A.LesgoldA. M.Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. In ResnickL. B.WeaverP. (Eds.), Theory and practice in early reading.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press.
24.
PerfettiC. A.LesgoldA. M.Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In CarpenterP.JustM. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977, 141–183.
25.
PosnerM.Chronometric explorations of mind.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.
26.
ReitmanJ. S.Mechanisms of forgetting in short term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2, 185–195.
27.
ReitmanJ. S.Without surreptitious rehearsal, information in short term memory decays. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 365–377.
28.
RothkopfE. Z.Learning of written instructive materials: An exploration of the control of inspection behavior by test-like events. American Educational Research Journal, 1966, 3, 241–249.
29.
RothkopfE. Z.BibiscosE. E.Selective facilitative effects of interspersed questions on learning from written materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967, 58, 36–61.
30.
SchallertD. L.Improving memory for prose: The relationship between depth of processing and context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976, 15, 621–632.
31.
ShiffrinR. M.Capacity limitations in information processing attention and memory. In EstesW. K. (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, Volume 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.
32.
SchneiderW.ShiffrinR. M.Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 1–66.
33.
SchneiderW.ShiffrinR. M.Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 127–190.
34.
StichtT. G.Comprehending reading at work. In JustM. A.CarpenterP. A. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977, 221–248.
