BickleyA. C.EllingtonB. J.BickleyR. T.The cloze procedure: A conspectus. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1970, 2, 232–249.
2.
BormuthJ. R.Cloze test readability: Criterion-referenced scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 189–196.
3.
BormuthJ. R.Literacy in the classroom. In PageW. D. (Ed.), Help for the reading teacher: New directions in research. Urbana, IL: NCRE/ERIC, 1975.
4.
BormuthJ. R.Factor validity of cloze tests as measures of reading comprehension ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 1969, 4.
5.
CarverR. P.Understanding, information-processing, and learning from prose materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 64, 76–84.
6.
CarverR. P.Measuring the primary effect of reading: Reading-storage technique, understanding judgments, and cloze. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1974, 6, 249–274.
7.
ColemanE. B.MillerG. R.A measure of information gained during prose learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 1968, 3, 369–386.
8.
CunninghamJ. W.CunninghamP. M.Validating a limited-cloze procedure. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1978, 10, 211–213.
9.
GallantR.Use of cloze tests as a measure of readability in the primary grades. In FigurelJ. A. (Ed.), Reading and inquiry. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1965.
10.
KlareG. R.Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 1974–75, 10, 62–102.
11.
KlareG. R.SimaikoH. W.StolurowL. M.The cloze procedure: A convenient readability test for training materials and translations. International Review of Applied Psychology, 1972, 21 (2), 77–106.
12.
MarshallN.GlockM. D.Comprehension of connected discourse: A study into the relationships between the structure of text and information recalled. Reading Research Quarterly, 1978–1979, 14, 10–56.
13.
MeredithK.VaughnJ. L.Jr.Stability of cloze scores across varying deletion patterns. In PearsonP. D.HansenJ. (Eds.), Reading: Disciplined inquiry in process and practice. Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference, 1978.
14.
RankinE. F.The cloze procedure revisited. In NackeP. L. (Ed.), Interaction: Research and practice for college-adult reading. Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference, 1974.
15.
RankinE. F.CulhaneJ.Comparable cloze and multiple-choice comprehension test scores. Journal of Reading, 1969, 13, 193–198.
16.
RankinE. F.DaleL. H.Cloze residual gain—A technique for measuring learning through reading. In SchickG. B.MayM. M. (Eds.), The psychology of reading behavior. Milwaukee: National Reading Conference, 1969.
17.
RothkopfE. Z.Textual constraint as function of repeated inspection. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1968, 59, 20–25.
18.
TaylorW.Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 1953, 30, 415–433.
19.
TaylorW. L.“Cloze” readability scores as indices of individual differences in comprehension and aptitude. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1957, 41, 19–26.
20.
ThorndikeR. L.HagenE.Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (3rd edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1969.
21.
VaughanJ. L.Jr.MeredithK. E.Reliability of the cloze procedure as assessments of various language elements. In PearsonP. D.HansenJ. (Eds.), Reading: Disciplined inquiry in process and practice. Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference, 1978.