Adult subjects were given concrete and abstract textbook passages to study by using either an imaginai or verbal strategy. Two days later, they were given a multiple-choice test and a production test of comprehension. The verbal strategy produced better comprehension than the imaginai strategy; concrete passages were comprehended better than abstract passages, but only according to the production test; and strategy and concreteness did not interact. Differences between these results and results obtained in imagery research on word lists are discussed, and caution is advised before generalizing the word research to meaningful prose learning by adults
AndersonR. C.How to contruct achievement test to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 1972, 42, 145–170.
3.
AndersonR. C.KulhavyR. W.Imagery and prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 63, 242–243.
4.
De VilliersP. A.Imagery and theme in recall of connected discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 103, 263–268.
5.
GorensteinS.Introduction to archaeology. New York: Basic Books, 1965.
6.
JohnsonM. K.BransfordJ. D.NybergS. E.ClearyJ. J.Comprehension factors in interpreting memory for abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1972, 11, 451–454.
7.
JohnsonR. E.Learners' predictions of the recallability of prose. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1974, 28, 41–51.
8.
JustM. A.BrownellH. H.Retrieval of concrete and abstract prose descriptions from memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1974, 28, 339–350.
9.
KierasD.Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information processing models for imagery effects in verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, 532–554.
10.
KosslynS. M.PomerantzJ. R.Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9, 52–76.
11.
MoeserS. D.Memory for meaning and wording in concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 682–697.
12.
MontagueW. E.CarterJ. F.Vividness of imagery in recalling connected discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 64, 72–75.
13.
PaivioA.Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 241–263.
14.
PaivioA.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
15.
PaivioA.Language and knowledge of the world. Educational Researcher, 1974, 3, 5–12.
16.
PaivioA.FothD.Imaginal and verbal mediators and noun concreteness in paired-associate learning: The elusive interaction. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 384–390.
17.
PylyshynZ. W.What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 1–24.
18.
PressleyM.Imagery and children's learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective. Review of Educational Research., 1977, 47, 585–622.
19.
Van GelderR. G.Biology of mammals. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1969.
20.
YuilleJ. C.PaivioA.Abstractness and recall of connected discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 82, 467–471.
