Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Response latencies were obtained in word matching and sentence completion tasks from disabled readers, age-matched normal readers, and reading-level matched normal readers. The disabled group was significantly slower than the old normal group on both tasks (p < .001) and did not differ from the young normal group. None of the groups required more time for sentence completion than physical matching, indicating that semantic processing of these sentences was highly automatized. The disabled and younger groups were slower on physically confusable words than dissimilar words; whereas, the older were the same on both types of words, indicating that perceptual and decoding processes are learned by normal readers but are a primary source of deficiency in disabled readers.

References

Carroll

J.B.

The nature of the reading process. In Calkin

E.O.

(Ed.), Reading Forum, N.I.N.D.S. Monograph Number 11. Betbesda, Md.: Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, 1969.

Chomsky

Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965.

Gibson

E.J.

Perceptual learning theory and word perception. Cognitive Psychology, 1971.

Gough

One second of reading. In Kavanagh

J.F.

Mattingly

I.G.

(Eds.), Language by ear and eye: The relationships between speech and reading. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1971.

Guthrie

J.T.

Models of reading and reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973a, 65, 9–18.

Guthrie

J.T.

Reading comprehension and syntactic responses in good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973b, 65, 294–299.

Jarvella

R.J.

Pisoni

D.B.

Green

B.G.

Tikofsky

R.S.

The development of selectional rules in children's sentence productions. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, 1972.

Katz

Wicklund

D.A.

Letter scanning rate for good and poor readers in grades two and six. Journal of Educational Psychology 1972, 63, 363–367.

Kavanagh

J.F.

Mattingly

I.G.

Language by ear and eye: The relationships between speech and reading. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1971.

10.

Kirk

Experimental Designs: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks-Cole, 1969.

11.

Kolers

Three stages of reading. In Smith

(Ed.), Psycholinguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.

12.

Otto

Chester

Sight words for beginning readers. Journal of Educational Research 1972, 65, 435–443.

13.

Pearson

P.D.

Studt

Effects of word frequency and contextual richness on children's word identification abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology 1975, 67, 89–95.

14.

Perfetti

C.A.

Hogaboam

Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 1975, 67, 461–469.

15.

Samuels

S.J.

Begy

Chen

C.C.

Comparison of word recognition speed and strategies of less skilled and more highly skilled readers. Reading Research Quarterly 1975–1976, 11. 72–86.

16.

Siegel

Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

17.

Smith

Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1971.

18.

Smith

Holmes

D.L.

The independence of letter, word, and meaning identification in reading. Reading Research Quarterly 1971, 6, 394–415.

19.

Spoehr

K.T.

Smith

E.E.

The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology 1973, 5, 71–89.

Perceptual and Linguistic Processing of Letters and Words by Normal and Disabled Readers a

Abstract

References