This study assessed the reliability of nine different measures used in reading and typographic research. Test-retest correlations were calculated for university students and schoolchildren, both male and female. It was clear that some measures were more reliable than others: for example, oral reading was highly reliable, but comprehension was not. The results are discussed with reference to the objectives of different types of measure.
References
1.
BurnhillP.HartleyJ.Psychology and textbook design. In Aspects of Educational Technology, 8. London: Pitman, 1974.
2.
Della-PianaG.M.EndoG.T.Reading Research. In TraversR.M.W. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
3.
FosterJ.J.A study of the legibility of one and two column layouts for B.P.S. publications. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1970, 23, 113–114.
4.
GillilandJ.Readability. London: University Press, 1972.
5.
HartleyJ.BurnhillP.Experiments with unjustified text. Visible Language, 1971, 5, (3), 265–278.
6.
HartleyJ.BurnhillP.FraserS.Typographical aspects of instructional design. In BudgettR.LeedhamJ. (Eds.). Aspects of Educational Technology, 7, London: Pitman, 1973.
7.
KlareG.R.SinaikoH.W.StolurowL.M.The cloze procedure: a convenient readability test for training materials and translations. International Review of Applied Psychology, 1972, 21, (2), 77–105.
8.
KolersP.A.Experiments in reading. Scientific American, 1972, 227, (1), 84–91.
9.
MooreJ.E.Sex differences in speed of reading: a correction. Journal of Experimental Education, 1939, 8, 245.
10.
PoultonE.C.Effects of printing types and formats on the comprehension of scientific journals. M.R.C. Applied Psychology Unit Report No. 346. Cambridge University, U.K., 1959.
11.
PoultonE.C.Skimming (scanning) news items printed in 8-point and 9-point letters. Ergonomics, 1967, 10, (6), 713–716.
12.
PoultonE.C.BrownC.H.Memory after reading aloud and reading silently. British Journal of Psychology, 1967, 58, 219–222.
13.
PrestonR.C.BotelM.Reading comprehension tested under timed and untimed conditions. School and Society, August 4, 1951.
14.
PyrczakF.Objective evaluation of the quality of multiple-choice tests designed to measure comprehension of reading passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 1972, 8, (1), 62–71.
15.
SmithH.K.The responses of good and poor readers when asked to read for different purposes. Reading Research Quarterly, 1967, 3, (1), 53–83.
16.
ThalbergS.P.Reading rate and immediate versus delayed retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967, 58, (6), 373–378.
17.
TinkerM.A.Speed versus comprehension in reading as affected by level of difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1939, 30, (2), 81–94.
18.
TuinmanJ.J.Passage related reading comprehension questions. Paper presented to AERA meeting, New York: February, 1971.
19.
TuinmanJ.J.Determining the passage dependency of comprehension questions in five major tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 1974, 9, 206–223.
