Using six analysts, test-retest and inter-analyst reliabilities were determined for the Automated Readability Index (ARI), the Flesch Reading Ease Score, and the Fog Count. All coefficients, with the exception of one Flesch measure, were above .94.
Analysis of variance applied to measured working times indicated that the Flesch takes significantly longer to use than the ARI and Fog.
References
1.
CokeE. V.RothkopfE. Z.Note on an algorithm for a computer-produced reading ease score. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1970, 54, 208–210.
2.
FarrJ. N.JenkinsJ. J.Tables for use with the Flesch Readability Formula. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1949, 33, 275–278.
3.
FleschR.A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948, 23, 221–233.
4.
FleschR.How to test readability. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1951.
5.
GuilfordJ. P.Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.
6.
GunningR.The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.
7.
HaggertyM. E.EurichA. C. Minnesota reading examinations for college students, Form A and Form B. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1930.
8.
HayesP. M.JenkinsJ. J.WalkerB. J.Reliability of the Flesch Readability Formulas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1950, 34, 22–26.
9.
KincaidJ. P.DelionbachL. J.Validation of the Automated Readability Index: A follow-up,Human Factors, 1973, 15, 17–20.
10.
KincaidJ. P.Van DuesenJ.ThomasG.LewisR.AndersonP. T.MoodyL.Use of the Automated Readability Index for evaluating peer-prepared material for use in adult reading education OEG-4-71-0069. Statesboro, Georgia: Georgia Southern College, 1972 (ERIC file # ED-068-814).
11.
KlareG. R.The measurement of readability. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1963.
12.
KlareG. R.RoweP. P.St. JohnM. G.StolurowL. M.Automation of the Flesch “Reading Ease” Readability Formula, with various options. Reading Research Quarterly, 1969, 4, 550–559.
13.
SmithE. A.KincaidJ. P.Derivation and validation of the Automated Readability Index for use with technical materials. Human Factors, 1970, 12, 457–464.
