The hypothesis that dialect differences exert an interference effect in the acquisition of literacy skills remains unproven on the basis of research into the relationship between Black English and reading. Supplementary evidence was sought by studying the oral reading performance of grade three students in Newfoundland where a distinct dialect prevails. A comparison was made of oral reading performances of subjects reading Standard English material and equivalent material containing validated syntactic structures of the local dialect. Significant differences favouring the Standard English readings were revealed for three measures of oral reading proficiency so the interference hypothesis was not supported. The findings showed the language flexibility possessed by eight-year old dialect speakers and pointed to the research hazards of inferring written language ability on the basis of oral performances.
References
1.
AmesW.S.RosenC.L.OlsonA.V.The Effects of Nonstandard Dialect on the Oral Reading Behaviour of Fourth Grade Black Children. In BraunC. (Ed.), Language, Reading and the Communication Process. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, 1971, 63–70.
2.
BaratzJ.C.Teaching Reading in an Urban Negro School System. In BaratzJ.C.ShuyR.W. (Eds.), Teaching Black Children to Read. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1969, 92–116.
3.
BaratzJ.C.The Relationship of Black English to Reading: A Review of Research. In LaffeyJ.L.ShuyR.W. (Eds.), Language Differences: Do They Interfere?Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, 1973, 101–113.
4.
BurkeC.L.Dialect and the Reading Process. In LaffeyJ.L.ShuyR.W. (Eds.), Language Differences: Do They Interfere?Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, 1973, 91–100.
5.
FasoldR.W.WolframW.Some Linguistic Features of Negro Dialect. In FasoldR.W.ShuyR.W. (Eds.), Teaching Standard English in the Inner City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1970, 41–86.
6.
FryE.Reading Instruction for Classroom and Clinic. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1972.
7.
GoodmanY.M.BurkeC.L.Reading Miscue Inventory. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1972.
8.
JohnsonD.K.An Investigation of the Oral Language and Oral Reading of Black First Grade Children. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1970.
9.
LabovW.The Reading of the -ed Suffix. In LevinH.WilliamsJ.P. (Eds.), Basic Studies on Reading. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1970, 222–245.
10.
LabovW.CohenP.RobinsC.LewisJ.A Study of the Nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City. Final Report, Cooperative Research Project No. 3288, Office of Education, Washington, D.C., 1968.
11.
MelmedP.J.Black English Phonology: The Question of Reading Interference. In LaffeyL.J.ShuyR.W. (Eds.), Language Differences: Do They Interfere?Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, 1973, 70–85.
12.
NolenP.A.A Study of Black Dialect in Reading. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington, 1971.
13.
NoseworthyR.G.A Dialect Survey of Grand Bank, Newfoundland. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 1971.
14.
PaddockH.J.A Dialect Survey of Carbonear, Newfoundland. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 1966.
15.
PattersonG.Notes on the Dialect of the People of Newfoundland. Nova Scotia Institute of Science: Proceedings and Transactions. 9 (1896), 44–78.
16.
SchneiderM.Black Dialect: The Basis for an Approach to Reading Instruction. Educational Leadership, 1971, 28, 543–549.
17.
ShuyR.W.Nonstandard Dialect Problems: An Overview. In LaffeyJ.L.ShuyR.W. (Eds.), Language Differences: Do They Interfere?Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, 1973, 3–16.
18.
StoryG.M.Newfoundland English Usage. Encyclopedia Canadiana, Vol. 7, Toronto: Grolier of Canada, 1957, 321–322.
19.
TorreyJ.W.Illiteracy in the Ghetto. Harvard Educational Review, 1970, 40, 253–259.
20.
VenezkyR.L.Nonstandard Language and Reading. Elementary English, 1970, 47, 334–344.
21.
VenezkyR.L.ChapmanR.S.Is Learning to Read Dialect Bound? In LaffeyJ.L.ShuyR.W. (Eds.), Language Differences: Do They Interfere?Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, 1973, 62–69.
22.
WeberR.M.Dialect Differences in Oral Reading: An Analysis of Errors. In LaffeyJ.L.ShuyR.W. (Eds.), Language Differences: Do They Interfere?Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, 1973, 47–61.
23.
WeenerP.D.The Influence of Dialect Differences on the Immediate Recall of Verbal Messages. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, 1967.
24.
WolframW.Sociolinguistic Alternatives in Teaching Reading to Nonstandard Speakers. Reading Research Quarterly, 1970, 6, 9–33.
