Literal and Inferential reading comprehension was assessed for 533 sixth grade students. The tests used are new instruments for measuring reading comprehension. Each test provides subscale scores: six subscales for literal reading comprehension and five subscales for inferential reading comprehension. The total data were factor analyzed using principal components and maximum likelihood procedures. The results indicate the two tests are measuring distinct factors.
References
1.
AlbrightB. F.Typical reading disabilities of college entrants. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Southern California, 1927.
2.
AlshanL. M.A factor analytic study of items in the measurement of fundamental factors of reading comprehension. (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University) New York, New York: University Microfilms, 1964, No. 65–4756.
3.
CarrollR. P.An experimental study of comprehension in reading. New York: Bureau of Publishing, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1927.
4.
ClelandD. L.A construct of comprehension. Proceedings of the International Reading Association, 1965, 10, 59–64.
5.
ClymerT.What is reading?: some current concepts. 67th Yearbook of National Society for the Study of Education, 1968, 7–29.
6.
DavisF. B.Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 1944, 9, 185–97.
7.
DavisF. B.Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 1968, 3, 499–545.
8.
DavisF. B.Psychometric research on comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 1972, 7, 628–678.
9.
DeweyJ. C.The acquisition of facts as a measure of reading comprehension,Elementary School Journal, 1935, 35, 346–348.
10.
FaganW. T.Transformation and comprehension,The Reading Teacher, 1971, 25, 169–175.
11.
FederD. D.Comprehension maturity tests—a new technique in mental measurement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1938, 29, 597–606.
12.
FlanaganJ. C.Flanagan aptitude classification tests: Technical report. Chicago Science Research Associates, 1959.
13.
GrayW. S.Principles of method in teaching reading as derived from scientific investigation. In National Society for the Study of Education, Eighteenth Yearbook, Part II. Bloomington, Ill.: Public School Publishing Co., 1919, pp. 26–51.
14.
HarrisC. W.Measurement of comprehension in literature,The School Review, 1948, 56, 280–289; 332–342.
15.
HolmesJ. A.Factors underlying major reading disabilities at the college level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1948.
16.
HolmesJ. A.Factors underlying major reading disabilities at the college level. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1954, 49–395.
17.
HolmesJ. A.SingerH.Speed and power of reading in high school. Washington D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1966. (Cooperative Research Monograph, No. 14).
18.
ImusH. A.An evaluation of visual factors in reading. Hanover, New Hampshire: Dartmouth College Pub., 1938.
19.
JohnsonM. S.Factors in reading comprehension. Ed. Admin. and Supervision, 1949, 35, 385–406.
20.
JoreskogK.ThilloM.New rapid algorithms for factor analysis by unweighted least square generalized least square, and maximum likelihood. Research Memorandum 71–5. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1971.
21.
NieN.DaleBentHullC. H.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
22.
PettitN. T.Effects of Reading for Given Purposes on Literal and Inferential Comprehension. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri) Columbia, Missouri: University Microfilms, 1970.
23.
RichardsI. A.Practical criticism. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1929.
24.
RobinsonH. M.The major aspects of reading. In RobinsonH. A. (Ed.) Reading: Seventy-five years of progressChicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966, pp. 22–32. (Supplementary Educational Monographs, No. 96).
25.
ShaycoftM. F.What the tests measure. In FlanaganJ. C.DavisF. B. (Eds.) The American high school student. Pittsburgh: Project Talent Office, University of Pittsburgh, 1964.
26.
SimonH. D.Reading comprehension: The need for a new perspective,Reading Research Quarterly, 1971, 7, 338–364.
27.
SingerH.Substrata-factor theory of reading, research and evaluation of critiques,Proceedings of the International Reading Association, 1965, 10, 325–331.
28.
SpearrittD.Identification of subskills of reading comprehension by maximum likelihood factor analysis,Reading Research Quarterly, 1972, 8, 2–111.
29.
ThorndikeE. L.The psychology of thinking in the case of reading. Psychological Review, 1917, 24, 220–234.
30.
ThorndikeE. L.Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading,Journal of Educational Psychology, 1917, 8, 323–332. (b).
31.
ThorndikeE. L.The understanding of sentences. Elementary School Journal, 1917, 18, 98–114 (c).
32.
Petriel Reading Comprehension Test.Neila T. Pettit and Irvin W. Cockriel. Lucas Brothers Publishing Company, 909 Lowery Street, Columbia, Missouri 65201, 1973.
