CarrollJ. B. Review of Guilford, J. P. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967, In American Educational Research Journal, 1968, 5, 249–256.
2.
CronbachL. J.The two disciplines of scientific psychology. The American Psychologist1957, 12, 671–684.
3.
DuboisP. H.ManningW. H.SpiesC. J., (Eds.) Factor analysis and related techniques in the study of learning. Technical Report No. 7. Office of Naval Research Contract No. Nonr 816 (02), Naval Air Training. August, 1959.
4.
FergusonG. A.On learning and human ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology1954, 8, 95–112.
5.
FergusonG. A.On transfer and the abilities of man. Canadian Journal of Psychology1956, 10, 121–131.
6.
FleishmanE. A.The description and prediction of perceptual-motor skill leaning. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Training research and education. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1962, Pp. 137–175.
7.
GardnerR. W.Cognitive controls in adaptation: Research and measurement. In MessickS.RossJ. (Eds.), Measurement in personality and cognition. New York: Wiley, 1962, Pp. 183–190.
8.
GuilfordJ. P.The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1967.
9.
HolzmanP. S.KleinG. S.Motive and style in reality contact. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic1956, 20, 191–194.
10.
KaganJ.Reflection-impulsivety and reading ability in primary grade children. Child development1965, 36, 609–628.
11.
KaganJ.MossH. A.SiegelI. E.Psychological significance of styles and conceptualization. Basic Cognitive Processes in Children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Childhood Development, 1963. 28, 73–112.
12.
OhnmachtF. W.Effects of field independence and dogmatism on reversal and nonreversal shifts in concept formation. Perceptual and Motor Skills1966, 22, 491–497.
13.
OhnmachtF. W.Individual differences in reading. 19th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. (in press).
14.
RokeachM.The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
15.
SellsS. B.Psychological aspects of research design. In CollierR. O.ElamS. M., (Eds.), Research design and analysis. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa, 1961, Pp. 13–172.
16.
StanleyJ. C.Studying status vs. manipulating variables. In CollierR. O.ElamS. M. (Eds.), Research design and analysis. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa, 1961, Pp. 173–192.