Comparing Peer Review and Self-Review as Ways to Improve College Students' Writing

Barritt L. S. Kroll B. M. (1978). Some implications of cognitive-developmental psychology for research in composing. In Cooper C. R. Odell L. (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 49–57). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Beach R. (1976). Self-evaluation strategies of extensive revisers and nonrevisers. College Composition and Communication, 27, 160–164.

Beach R. (1979). The effects of between-draft teacher evaluation versus student self-evaluation on high school students' revising of rough drafts. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 111–119.

Beach R. (1989). Showing students how to assess: Demonstrating techniques for response in the writing conference. In Anson C. M. (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 127–148). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Beach R. Eaton S. (1984). Factors influencing self-assessing and revising by college freshmen. In Beach R. Bridwell L. (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 149–170). New York: Guilford.

Beach R. Friedrich T. (2006). Response to writing. In MacArthur C. Graham S. Fitzgerald J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222–234). New York: Guilford.

Berkenkotter C. (1984). Student writers and their sense of authority over texts. College Composition and Communication, 35, 312–319.

Brammer C. Rees M. (2007). Peer review from the students' perspective: Invaluable or invalid? Composition Studies, 35, 71–85.

Bruffee K. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind.” College English, 46, 635–652.

Christensen C. A. (2005). The role of orthographic-motor integration in the production of creative and well-structured written text for students in secondary school. Educational Psychology 25, 441–453.

Covill A. (2010). Literacy practices, beliefs, and attitudes of college students. Manuscript submitted for publication.

DiPardo A. Freedman S. W. (1988). Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 58, 119–149.

Elbow P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Elbow P. (1997). High stakes and low stakes in assigning and responding to writing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 69, 5–13.

Faigley L. Witte S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400–414.

Fallahi C. Wood R. Austad C. Fallahi H. (2006). A program for improving undergraduate psychology students' basic writing skills. Teaching of Psychology 33, 171–175.

Flower L. (1986). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. In Newkirk T. (Ed.), To compose: Teaching writing in high school and college (pp. 125–152). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Flower L. Hayes J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387.

Flower L. Hayes J. R. (1984). Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication, 1, 120–160.

Flower L. Hayes J. R. Carey L. Schriver K. Stratman J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16–55.

Freedman S. W. (1985). Introduction: Acquiring written language. In Freedman S. W. (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. x–xv). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Gere A. R. Stevens R. S. (1985). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision. In Freedman S. W. (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 85–105). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Graham S. Perin D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476.

Harris M. (1992). Collaboration is not collaboration is not collaboration: Writing center tutorials vs. peer-response groups. College Composition and Communication, 43, 369–383.

Hayes J. R. Flower L. Schriver K. Stratman J. Carey L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In Rosenberg S. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistic, vol. 2: Reading, writing, and language learning (pp. 176–240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Herrington A. J. Cadman D. (1991). Peer review and revising in an anthropology course: Lessons for learning. College Composition and Communication, 42, 184–199.

Hillocks G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Holliway D. R. McCutchen D. (2004). Audience perspective in young writers' composing and revising: Reading as the reader. In Allal L. Chanquoy L. Largy P. (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 87–101). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Johnstone K. M. Ashbaugh H. Warfield T. D. (2002). Effects of repeated practice and contextual-writing experiences on college students' writing skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 305–315.

MacArthur C. A. (2007). Best practices in teaching evaluation and revision. In Graham S. MacArthur C. A. Fitzgerald J. (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 141–162). New York: Guilford Press.

Matsuhashi A. Gillam A. Conley R. Moss B. (1989). A theoretical framework for studying peer tutoring as response. In Anson C. M. (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 293–316). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Matsuhashi A. Gordon E. (1985). Revision, addition, and the power of the unseen text. In Freedman S. W. (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 226–249). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

McCutchen D. (2006). Cognitive factors in the development of children's writing. In MacArthur C. Graham S. Fitzgerald J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 115–134). New York: Guilford.

McCutchen D. Covill A. Hoyne S. Mildes K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256–266.

Murray D. (1978). Internal revision: A process of discovery. In Cooper C. R. Odell L. (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 85–103). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Murray D. (1982). Teaching the other self: The writer's first reader. College Composition and Communication, 33, 140–147.

Newkirk T. (1984). How students read student papers: An exploratory study. Written Communication, 1, 283–305.

Nystrand M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Nystrand M. Brandt D. (1989). Response to writing as a context for learning to write. In Anson C. M. (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 209–230). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Olson V. L. B. (1990). The revising processes of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 22–29.

Perin D. (2007). Best practices in teaching writing to adolescents. In Graham S. MacArthur C. Fitzgerald J. (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 242–264). New York: Guilford Press.

Rieber L. J. (2006). Using peer review to improve student writing in business courses. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 322–327.

Sommers J. (1989). The writer's memo: Collaboration, response, and development. In Anson C. M. (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 174–186). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Sommers N. Saltz L. (2004). The novice as expert: Writing the freshman year. College Composition and Communication, 56, 124–147.

Troia G. (2007). Research in writing instruction: What we know and what we need to know. In Pressley M. Billman A. Perry K. Reffitt K. Reynolds J. M. (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need (pp. 129–156). New York: Guilford Press.

U. S. News and World Report. (2006). Directory of colleges and universities. America's Best Colleges, 133–288.

Wallace D. L. Hayes J. R. Hatch J. A. Miller W. Moser G. Silk C. M. (1996). Better revision in eight minutes? Prompting first-year college writers to revise globally. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 682–688.

White T. L. Kirby B. J. (2005). Tis better to give than to receive: An undergraduate peer review project. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 259–261.

Yarrow F. Topping K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 261–282.

Zhang S. (1995). Re-examining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Learning, 4(3), 209–222.