CarverR.P. (1990). Reading rate: A review of research and theoryNew York: Academic Press.
2.
CarverR.P. (1994). Percentage of unknown vocabulary words in text as a function of the relative difficulty of the text: Implications for instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 413–437.
3.
CarverR.P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1 (1), 3–43.
4.
CarverR.P. (2000a). The causes of high and low reading achievement.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
CarverR.P. (2000b). How will literacy be defined?Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 67–68.
6.
CarverR.P.ClarkS.W. (1998). Investigating reading disabilities using the rauding diagnostic system. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31 (5), 143–174.
7.
CarverR.P.DavidA.H. (2001). Investigating reading achievement using a causal model. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5 (2), 107–140.
8.
CarverR.P.LeibertR.E. (1995). The effect of reading library books at different levels of difficulty upon gain in reading ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 26–48.
9.
CunninghamA.E.StanovichK.E.WilsonM.R. (1990). Cognitive variation in adult college students differing in reading ability. In CarrT.H.LevyB.A. (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 129–159). New York: Academic Press.
10.
GoodmanK.S. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In. SingerH.RuddellR.B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497–508). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
11.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.