To test the validity of the Literary Response Questionnaire (lrq, Miall & Kuiken, 1995b) and to assess its relationships with student, home-background, and school-related variables, the lrq was administered to Dutch students in grades 7, 8, and 9. The seven first-order factors of the lrq, as identified by Miall and Kuiken {1995b), were confirmed. One of the two second-order factors was not identified. However, a model with two different second-order factors fitted the data. Trance, the first factor, represents the degree to which a reader is absorbed in a story. Literary Interpretation, the second factor, represents the degree to which a reader likes or dislikes literary criticism and reflection on the meaning of what is read. Grade, gender, type of education, vocabulary size, reading behavior, and cultural level of the home environment were the best predictors of the literary response scores. Results are discussed in relation to response theories and research and to literary education.
References
1.
AllenM.J.YenW.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
AllerupP. (1985). Why I like to read: Statistical analysis of questionnaire data.Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
3.
BarnesD.BarnesD.ClarkeS. (1984). Versions of English.London: Heinemann.
4.
BeachR. (1993). A teacher's introduction to reader-response theories.Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
5.
BeachR.HyndsS. (1991). Research on response to literature. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP.D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 453–489). London: Longman.
6.
BlackJ.SeifertC. (1985). The psychological study of story understanding. In CooperC. (Ed.), Research response to literature and the teaching of literature (pp. 190–211). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7.
BleichD. (1986a) Cognitive stereoscopy and the study of language and literature. In PetersonB. (Ed.), Convergences (pp. 99–114) Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8.
BleichD. (1986b). Gender interests in reading and language. In FlynnE.A.SchweickartP.P. (Eds.), Gender and reading: Essays on readers, texts, and contexts (pp. 213–238). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
BrittonJ. (1984). Viewpoints: The distinction between participant and spectator role language in research and practice. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 320–331.
10.
BunburyR. (1985). Levels of response to literature. Australian Journal of Reading, 8, 220–228.
11.
ChildI. (1965). Personality correlates of esthetic judgment in college students. Journal of Personality, 33, 476–511.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
CostaP.T.McCraeR.R. (1978). Objective personality assessment. In StorandtM.SieglerI.C.EliasM.F. (Eds.), The clinical psychology of aging (pp. 119–143). New York: Plenum Press.
14.
CrawfordM.ChaffinR. (1986). The reader's construction of meaning: Cognitive research on gender and comprehension. In FlynnE.A.SchweickartP.P. (Eds.), Gender and reading: Essays on readers, texts, and contexts (pp. 3–30). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
De GlopperK.Van Daalen-KapteijnsM.Schouten-Van ParrerenC. (1997). Vocabulary knowledge and skill inferring word meaning from context.Amsterdam: sco-Kohnstamm Institute.
16.
DeKayS. (1996). Classroom research into the teaching of literature.New York: Fordham University. (eric Document Reproduction Service No. ed 399 540).
17.
DiasP.HayhoeM. (1987). Developing response to poetry.Philadelphia: Open University Press.
18.
DickersonM.J. (1988). A voice of one's own: Creating writing identities. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, St. Louis, mo.
19.
FishS.E. (1970). Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. New Literary History, 2, 123–162.
20.
FlynnE. (1986). Gender and reading. In FlynnE.A.SchweickartP.P. (Eds.), Gender and reading: Essays on readers, texts, and contexts (pp. 267–289). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
21.
GoetzE.T.SadoskiM. (1996). Imaginative processes in literary comprehension: Bringing the text to life. In KreuzR.J.MacNealyM.S. (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 221–240). Westport, CT: Ablex.
22.
GoetzE.T.SadoskiM.StoweM.L.FetscoT.G.KempS.G. (1993). Imagery and emotional response in reading literary text. Poetics, 22, 35–49.
23.
GoldJ. (1990). Read for your life: Literature as a life support system.Markham, Canada: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.
24.
GoldenJ.GuthrieJ. (1986). Convergence and divergence in reader response to literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 408–421.
25.
GuthrieJ.T.SchaferW.WangY.Y.AfflerbachP. (1995). Relationships of instruction to amount of reading: An exploration of social, cognitive, and instructional connections. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 8–25.
26.
HakemulderJ. (1997). Effects of literature: A review. In de ZepetnekToutousy S.SywenkyI. (Eds.), The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp.31–50). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
27.
HansenE. (1986). Emotional processes engendered by poetry and prose reading.Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
28.
HanssonG. (1990). Reading and understanding literature (Report Ser. No. 4.5). Albany, NY: State University of New York, Center for the Learning and Teaching of Literature.
29.
HarkerW.J. (1997) Literary texts as models: Implications for the empirical study of literature. In Tötösy de ZepetnekS.SywenkyI. (Eds.), The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp. 51–65). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
30.
HarsteN. (1985). Portrait of a new paradigm: Reading comprehension research. In CrismoreA. (Ed.), Landscapes: A state-of-the-art assessment of reading comprehension research: 1974–1984 (pp. 12–24). Bloomington, IN: Center for Reading and Language Studies, University of Indiana.
31.
HaysW.L. (1981). Statistics.New York: cbs College.
32.
HeathS. (1985). Being literate in America: A sociohistorical prospective. In NilesJ.LalikR. (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 1–18). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
33.
HendonW.S.HendonR.C. (1991). Barren my wit? The impact of television on reading. Poetics, 20, 319–341.
34.
HirschE.D. (1967). Validity in interpretation.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
HoornJ. (1997). Electrocortical evidence for the anomaly theory of metaphor processing: A brief introduction. In Tötösy de ZepetnekS.SywenkyI. (Eds.), The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp. 67–74). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
36.
HuntR.A.VipondD. (1985). Crash-testing a transactional model of literary reading. Reader: Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, 14, 23–39.
37.
HyndsS. (1985). Interpersonal cognitive complexity and the literary response processes of adolescent readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 386–404.
38.
HyndsS. (1990). Thinking about characters and thinking about people: Social cognition, literary response, and character attribution processes among young adult readers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
39.
IserW. (1978). The act of reading.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
JacobsenM. (1982). Looking for literary space: The willing suspension of disbelief revisited. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 21–38.
41.
JanssenT.M. (1998). Literatuuronderwijs bij benadering: Een empirisch onderzoek naar de vormgeving en opbrengsten van het literatuuronderwijs Nederlands in de bovenbouw van het havo en vwo [Approaches to literature teaching: An empirical study of the form and results of Dutch literature teaching in higher general secondary and pre-university education]. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
42.
JöreskogK.G.SörbomD. (1988). lisrel vii: A Guide to the Program and Applications.Chicago: spss, Inc.
43.
KerlingerF.N. (1964). Foundations of behavioral research. Educational and psychological inquiry.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
44.
KintgenE. (1983). The perception of poetry.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
45.
KnulstW.KraaykampG. (1996). Leesgewoonten: Een halve eeuw onderzoek naar het lezen en zijn belagers [Reading habits: Half a century of research into reading and its rivals]. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
46.
KnulstW.KraaykampG. (1998). Trends in leisure reading: Forty years of research on reading in the Netherlands. Poetics, 26, 21–41.
47.
KoziolS. (1982). Responding to literature: Communication skills (pcrp Assessment Survey I). Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania State Department of Education.
48.
MacCallumR.C.BrowneM.W.SugawaraH.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
49.
MaillouxS. (1984). Interpretive conventions: The reader in the study of American fiction.London: Cornell University Press.
50.
MartinezM.F. (1983). Young children's verbal responses to literature in parent-child story-time interactions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 1044a.
51.
MiallD.S.KuikenD. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407.
52.
MiallD.S.KuikenD. (1995a). Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23, 275–298.
53.
MiallD.S.KuikenD. (1995b). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58.
54.
MiallD.S.KuikenD. (1998). The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25, 327–341.
55.
MoffitM.A. (1987). Understanding the appeal of the romance novel for the adolescent girl: A reader-response approach. Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
56.
NellV. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
OtterM.E.SchoonenR. (1995). Aap, noot, niets of het spook van de ontlezing in het basisonderwijs [Ape, nut, nothing or the ghost of not reading in primary education]. Amsterdam: sco-Kohnstamm Instituut.
58.
PurvesA. (1973). Literature education in ten countries: An empirical study.New York: Wiley & Sons.
59.
PurvesA. (1981). Reading and literature: American achievement in international perspective.Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
60.
PurvesA. (1986). Cultural literacy and response to literature. Paper presented at the meeting of the ncte Assembly on Research, Chicago.
61.
RosenblattL.M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work.Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
62.
RosenblattL.M. (1995a) Continuing the conversation: A clarification. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 349–354.
63.
RosenblattL.M. (1995b) Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
64.
SadoskiM.GoetzE.T.KangiserS. (1988). Imagination in story reading: Relationships between imagery, affect, and structural importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 320–336.
65.
SadoskiM.GoetzE.T.OlivarezA.LeeS.RobertsN.M. (1990). Imagination in story reading: The role of imagery, verbal recall, story analysis, and processing levels. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 55–90.
66.
SadoskiM.QuastZ. (1990). Reader response and long-term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 256–272.
67.
ScarlettH.H.PressA.N.CrockettW.H. (1971). Children's descriptions of peers: A Wernerian developmental analysis. Child Development, 44, 439–453.
68.
SchmidtS.J. (1997) The empirical study of literature: Why and why not? In Tötösy de ZepetnekS.SywenkyI. (Eds.), The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp. 137–150). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
69.
SmithM.W. (1991). Constructing meaning from text: An analysis of ninth-grade reader responses. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 262–271.
70.
StangeT.V.CarterE.J. (1995). Gifted middle grade readers: Attitudes and interests in the 90s. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Reading Association, Anaheim, ca.
71.
SteigerJ.H.LindJ.M. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, ia.
72.
StevensJ. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences.London: Erlbaum.
73.
SvenssonC. (1985). The construction of poetic meaning: A cultural-developmental study of symbolic and nonsymbolic strategies in the interpretation of contemporary poetry.Lund, Sweden: Liber Forlag.
74.
SweetA.P.GuthrieJ.T.NgM.M. (1998). Teacher perceptions and student reading motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 210–223.
75.
TabachnickB.G.FidellL.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins College.
76.
TellegenA.AtkinsonG. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”): Traits related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277.
77.
TobinA.R. (1986). A study of the effectiveness of literature instruction demonstrated in two samples of high school juniors. Unpublished master's thesis, Kean College of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
78.
Van DijkT. (1979). Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 8, 569–608.
79.
Van PeerW. (1996). The ethics of literature: Two models. Journal Of Literary Semantics: An International Review, 25, 154–172.
80.
Van SchootenE. (1994). De bevordering van leesgedrag en attitude [The stimulation of reading behavior and reading attitude]. Spiegel, 3, 61–75.
81.
Van SchootenE.OostdamR.J. (1997). Fictie-onderwijs in de basisvorming: Attitudes van docenten en vormgeving van het onderwijs [Literary education in the basic secondary school curriculum: Attitudes of teachers and instructional design]. Spiegel, 15, 31–67.
82.
Van SchootenE.OostdamR.J. (1998). Leerlingen in de basisvorming over fictie en fictie onderwijs [Students in the basic secondary school curriculum about fiction and literary education]. Spiegel, 16, 47–82.
83.
VriendG. (1996). Literatuuronderwijs als voldongen feit: Legitimeringen voor het leren lezen van literatuur op school [Literary education as a fait accompli: Justification for learning how to read literature at school] (Amsterdamse Historische Reeks dl 30). Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
84.
WellekR.WarrenA. (1949). Theory of literature.New York: Harcourt.
85.
ZahariasJ. (1986). The effects of genre and tone on undergraduate students' preferred patterns of response to two short stories and two poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 56–68.
86.
ZahariasJ.A.MertzM.P. (1983). Identifying and validating the constituents of literary response through a modification of the response preference measure. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 231–241.
87.
ZwaanR.A. (1991). Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 20, 139–156.
