AllenJ.MöllerK. J.StroupD. (1999, December). Literature discussion group transactions and social interactions: Teacher as observer, teacher as mediator. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando FL.
2.
BeachR. (2000). Critical issues: Reading and responding to literature at the level of activity. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 237–251.
3.
BloomeD.KatzL. (1997). Literacy as social practice and classroom chronotypes. Reading Writing Quarterly, 113, 205–222.
4.
BoalA. (1985). Theatre of the oppressed.New York: Theatre Communications Group.
5.
EngestromY. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research.Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
6.
GeeJ. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies (2nd ed.). New York: Falmer Press.
7.
LewisC. (2000). Critical issues: Limits of identification: The personal, pleasurable, and critical in reader response. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 253–266.
8.
MöllerK. J. (1998). Reading socially in a multicultural world: Conceptualizing a response development zone. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
MöllerK. J.AllenJ. (2000). Connecting, resisting and searching for safer places: Students respond to Mildred Taylor's. The FriendshipJournal of Literacy Research, 32, 145–186.
10.
PattersonL.CottonC.Kimbell-LopezK.PavonettiL.VanHornL. (1998). The shared “AH-HA experience”: Literature conversations and self-organizing complex adaptive systems. In ShanahanT.Rodriguez-BrownF. (Eds.), Literacies for the twenty-first century: Research and practice. Forty-seventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 143–156). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
11.
RogersT.SoterA. (Eds.). (1997). Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society.New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
SumaraD. J. (2000). Critical issues: Researching complexity. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 267–281.
13.
TaylorM. D. (1987). The friendship.New York: Dial Books.
