In this article, I argue that the most common use of reader-response theory in the classroom is misguided in its emphasis on personal response and identification. After reconsidering the meaning of the “aesthetic stance” as defined in the work of Louise Rosenblatt, I discuss the social and political nature of readers, texts, and contexts. I include two examples of teachers talking about a work of children's literature to illustrate that when a text is about characters whose cultures and life worlds are very different from the reader's, disrupting the reader's inclination to identify with the text can heighten the reader's self consciousness and text consciousness. This stance should not be viewed as less aesthetic than a more direct or immediate relationship between reader and text. Finally, I argue for a broader view of what aesthetic reading can mean, one that addresses the social and political dimensions of texts and invites students to take pleasure in both the personal and the critical.
References
1.
AlthusserL. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In AlthusserL. (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 136–169). London: New Left Books.
2.
ApolL. (1998). “But what does this have to do with kids?”: Literary theory and children's literature in the teacher education classroom. Journal of Children's Literature, 24, 32–47.
3.
BeachR. (1993). A teacher's introduction to reader-response theories.Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
4.
BeachR. (1997). Students' resistance to engagement with multicultural literature. In RogersT.SoterA. (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 69–94). New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
BennettT. (1979). Formalism and Marxism.London: Methuen.
6.
BishopR.S. (1997). Selecting literature for a multicultural curriculum. In HarrisV. J. (Ed.), Using multiethnic literature in the k-8 classroom (pp. 1–19). Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
7.
BleichD. (1974). Readings and feelings: An introduction to subjective criticism.Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8.
BrittonJ. (1970). Language and learning.New York: Penguin.
9.
CaiM. (1997). Reader-response theory and the politics of multicultural literature. In RogersT.SoterA. (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 199–212). New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
CaiM. (1998). Multiple definitions of multicultural literature: Is the debate really just “ivory tower” bickering?The New Advocate, 10, 135–147.
11.
CaiM.TrawR. (1997). Literary literacy. Journal of Children's Literature, 23, 20–33.
12.
CorcoranB. (1994). Balancing reader response and cultural theory and practice. In CorcoranB.HayhoeM.PradleG. M. (Eds.), Knowledge in the making: Challenging the text in the classroom (pp. 3–23). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
13.
CurtisC. (1995). The Watsons go to Birmingham — 1963.New York: Delacorte.
14.
DeLawterJ. (1992). Teaching literature: From clerk to explorer. In LangerJ. (Ed.), Literature instruction: A focus on student response (pp. 101–130). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
15.
Dudley-MarlingC.MurphyS. (1998). Editors' page. Language Arts, 76, 112–114.
16.
EncisoP. E. (1998). Good/bad girls read together: Young girls' co-authorship of subject positions during a shared reading event. English Education, 30, 44–62.
17.
EvansK. (1996). Creating spaces for equity? The role of positioning in peer-led literature discussions. Language Arts, 73, 194–202.
18.
FangZ.FuD.LammeL. (1999). Rethinking the role of multicultural literature in literacy instruction: Problems, paradox, and possibility. The New Advocate, 12, 259–276.
19.
FreemanE. B.LehmanB. A.ScharerD. L. (1998). From the editor: On questions and quilts. Journal of Children's Literacy, 24, 3–4.
20.
GoodmanK.S. (1986). Basal readers: A call for action. Language Arts, 63, 358–363.
21.
HadeD. D. (1997). Reading multiculturally. In HarrisV. J. (Ed.), Using multiethnic literature in the k-8 classroom.Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
22.
HarrisV. J. (1993). Literature-based approaches to reading instruction. In Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 269–297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
23.
HarrisV. J. (1994). Multiculturalism and children's literature: An evaluation of ideology, publishing, curricula, and research. In KinzerC. K.LeuD. J. (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice. Forty-third yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 15–27). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
24.
HollandN. N. (1985). Reading readers reading. In CooperC. R. (Ed.), Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature: Points of departure (pp. 3–21). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25.
HooksB. (1991). Narratives of struggle. In MarianiP. (Ed.), Critical fictions: The politics of imaginative writing (pp. 53–61). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
26.
IserW. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
JaussH. R. (1982). Aesthetic experience and literary hermeneutics.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
KarolidesN. J. (1997). Challenging old habits of mind: Revisiting reader's stance. The New Advocate, 10, 161–169.
30.
LewisC. (1997). The social drama of literature discussions in a fifth/sixth-grade classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 163–204.
31.
LewisC. (1999). Teaching literature to adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 114–127.
32.
LewisCKetterJ.FabosB. (in press). Reading race in a rural context. The International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education..
33.
LukeA.FreebodyP. (1997). The social practices of reading. In MusprattS.LukeA.FreebodyP. (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies (pp. 185–225). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
34.
McGillisR. (1997). Learning to read, reading to learn; or engaging in critical pedagogy. Children's Literature Association Quarterly, 22, 126–132.
35.
MorganW. (1997). Critical literacy in the classroom: The art of the possible.New York: Routledge.
36.
O'NeillM. (1993). Teaching literature as cultural criticism. English Quarterly, 25, 19–25.
37.
RabinowitzP. J.SmithM. W. (1998). Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature.New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
RogersT.SoterA. O. (1997). Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society.New York: Teachers College Press.
39.
RosenbergP. M. (1997). Underground discourses: Exploring whiteness in teacher education. In FineM.PowellL.C.WeisL.Mun WongL. (Eds.), Off white: Readings on race, power, and society.New York: Routledge.
40.
RosenblattL. M. (1938). Literature as exploration.New York: Appleton-Century.
41.
RosenblattL. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work.Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
42.
RosenblattL. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory Into Practice, 21, 268–277.
43.
RosenblattL. M. (1985). The transactional theory of the literary work: Implications for research. In CooperC. R. (Ed.), Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature: Points of departure (pp. 33–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44.
RosenblattL. M. (1990). Retrospect. In FarrellE. J.SquireJ. R. (Eds.), Transactions with literature: A fifty-year perspective (pp. 97–107). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
45.
RosenblattL. M. (1991). Literary theory. In FloodJ.JensenJ. M.LappD.SquireJ. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 58–61). New York: Macmillan.
SimsR. (1983). Strong black girls: A ten year old responds to fiction about Afro-Americans. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16, 21–28.
48.
SipeL. R. (1997). Children's literature, literacy, and literary understanding. Journal of Children's Literature, 23, 6–19.
49.
SurberJ. P. (1998). Culture and critique: An introduction to the critical discourses of cultural studies.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50.
TompkinsJ. P. (Ed.). (1980). Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
51.
WadeS.ThompsonA.WatkinsW. (1994). The role of belief systems in authors' and readers' constructions of texts. In GarnerR.AlexanderP. A. (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 265–293). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
WalmsleyS. (1992). Reflections on the state of elementary literature instruction. Language Arts, 69, 508–514.
53.
WillisA.PalmerM. D. (1997). Negotiating the classroom: Learning and teaching multicultural literature. In WillisA. (Ed.), Teaching and using multicultural literature in grades 9–12: Moving beyond the canon.Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
54.
WolfS. A.BallentineD.HillL. (1999). The right to write: Preservice teachers' evolving understandings of authenticity and aesthetic heat in multicultural literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 130–184.
55.
WolfS. A.MierasE. L.CareyA. A. (1996). What's after “What's that?”: Preservice teachers learning to ask literary questions. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 459–497.
56.
ZarrilloJ.CoxC. (1992). Efferent and aesthetic teaching. In ManyJ.CoxC. (Eds.), Stance and literary understanding: Exploring the theories, research, and practice (pp. 239–245). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
