Drawing on a critical discourse perspective, we examine the “living dialogues,” or the complex interplay between discourses, in one neighborhood to recontextualize the often polarized debates about literacy instruction within education. Focusing on three children, their families, teachers, and classrooms, we argue that the creation of more inclusive school literacy practices requires a consideration of how discourses function within and across homes, communities, and schools. Thus we focus less on the merits or limits of one instructional method than on how living dialogues reflect particular and situated beliefs about language and literacy practices. Within this theoretical frame, classrooms arise as contextualized spaces where the living dialogues of unique discourse communities intersect, and where the relational discourses that shape and reflect classroom practices have the potential to open up or close down instructional spaces for children. A critical discourse perspective re-situates debates around literacy instruction and allows us to engage in complex ways with the dilemmas and possibilities of school-based literacy practices.
Perhaps the most insidious and least understood form of segregation is that of the word. For if the word has the potency to revive and make us free, it has also the power to bind, imprison, and destroy. - Ralph Ellison
References
1.
ArnoldM.S. (1995). Exploding the myths: African American families at promise. In SwadenerB.B.LubeckS. (Eds.), Children and families at promise: Deconstructing the discourse of risk (pp. 143–162). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2.
ArnoldM.S.SwadenerB.B. (1993). Savage inequalities and the discourse of risk: What of the White children who have so much green grass?The Review of Education, 15, 261–272.
3.
AukermanR.C. (1971). Approaches to beginning reading.New York: Wiley.
4.
BakhtinM.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5.
BakhtinM.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
6.
BallA. (1995). Community-based learning in an urban setting as a model for educational reform. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 3, 127–146.
7.
BartonD. (1997). Family literacy programs and home literacy practices. In TaylorD. (Ed.), Many families, many literacies (pp. 101–109). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1990). Literacy for empowerment: The role of parents in children's education.London: Falmer Press.
9.
DelpitL. (1986). Skills and other dilemmas of a progressive Black educator. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 379–385.
10.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflicts in the classroom.New York: The New Press.
11.
FaircloughN. (1989). Language and power.New York: Longman.
12.
FaircloughN. (Ed.). (1992). Critical language awareness.New York: Longman.
13.
FineM. (1993). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94, 682–710.
14.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse of language.New York: Pantheon.
15.
GeeJ. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses.New York: Falmer Press.
16.
GonzalesN.MollL.TeneryM.F.RiveraA.RendonP.GonzalesR.AmantiC. (1995). Funds of knowledge for teaching in Latino households. Urban Education, 29, 443–470.
17.
GutierrezK.RymesB.LarsonJ. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471.
18.
HeathS.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms.New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HolquistM. (1986). Introduction. In EmersonC.HolquistM. (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (McGeeV. W., Trans., pp. ix–xxiii). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
20.
KristevaJ. (1986). The Kristeva reader (MoiT., Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1997, January 7). Culturally relevant teaching and research.Lecture given at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
22.
LemkeJ. (1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics.Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
23.
LensmireT. (1994). When children write: Critical re-visions of the writing workshop.New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
LensmireT. (1997). The teacher as Dostoevskian novelist. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 367–392.
25.
McCartheyS.J. (1997). Connecting home and school literacy practices in classrooms with diverse populations. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 145–182.
26.
MerriamS.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
MollL.L.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalesN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.
28.
MorsonG.S. (1981). Introduction to extracts from the “Problem of speech genres.”MorsonG.S. (Ed.), Bakhtin: Essays and dialogues on his work (pp. 89–90). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
MossB. (1988). The Black sermon as a literacy event. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
30.
PappasC. (1997). Making “collaboration” problematic in collaborative school-university research: Studying with urban teacher researchers to transform literacy curriculum genres. In FloodJ.HeathS.B.LappD. (Eds.), A handbook for literacy educators: Research on teaching the communicative and visual arts (pp. 213–229). New York: Macmillan.
31.
PolakowV. (1993). Lives on the edge: Single mothers and their children in the other America.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Purcell-GatesV. (1995). Other people's words: The cycle of low literacy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
RogersT. (1997). No imagined peaceful place. In RogersT.SoterA. (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 95–115). New York: Teachers College Press.
34.
SavageM. (1988). Can ethnographic narrative be a neighborly act?Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 19, 3–19.
35.
SmithF. (1988). Joining the literacy club: Further essays into education.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
36.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
StanfieldJ. (1997, October 29). The university-community partnership movement: Political omissions, contradictions, and paradoxes.Lecture given at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
38.
StewartS. (1981). Shouts on the street: Bakhtin's anti-linguistics. In MorsonG.S. (Ed.), Bakhtin: Essays and dialogues on his work (pp. 41–58). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
StreetB. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education.New York: Longman.
40.
StuckeyJ.E. (1991). The violence of literacy.Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
41.
SwadenerB.B. (1990). Children and families “at risk”: Etiology, critique, and alternative paradigms. Educational Foundations, 4 (4), 17–39.
42.
SwadenerB.B.LubeckS. (1995). Children and families “at promise.”Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
43.
SwalesJ.HyonS. (1994). Genres of power. In PurvesA.C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of English studies and language arts (pp. 532–533). New York: Longman, and the National Council of Teachers of English.
44.
TaylorD.Dorsey-GainesC. (1988). Growing up literate: Learning from inner-city families.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
45.
WillisA.I. (1995). Reading the world of school literacy: Contextualizing the experience of a young African American male. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 30–49.
