Objective: The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether patient characteristics such as age, sex, length of inpatient stay and reason for admission were related to positive or negative treatment outcome at an adolescent inpatient unit.
Method: This study employed a prospective cohort design in the form of a clinical audit. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) pre- and post-admission scores were compared for the whole sample and across diagnoses.
Results: While there was a significant reduction overall in symptoms following an inpatient stay, patient characteristics and reason for admission were not related to outcomes at a statistically significant level.
Conclusions: This inpatient unit generally functions as a short stay unit and as a result it is difficult to draw any meaningful conclusions as to what sort of patient would benefit most from an admission to the unit.
GreenJ, JacobsB. The Children and Young Person's Inpatient Evaluation Study (CHYPIE) of the process, outcome and economics of child and adolescent psychiatry inpatient treatment. Conference Proceedings: Informing the Future of Inpatient CAMHS, London, 2004.
2.
SouranderAHelkkiläTLeijalaHHeinisuoAMHeleniusHPihaJ. Follow-up of short-term child psychiatric inpatient treatment. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry1995; 49: 95–101.
3.
SouranderAHeleniusHLeijalaHHeikkaläTBergrothLPihaJ. Predictors of outcome of short-term child psychiatric inpatient treatment. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1996; 5: 75–82.
4.
SouranderAHeleniusHPihaJ. Outcome of short-term child psychiatric hospitalization: Teacher evaluation at 5 month and 12 month follow-up. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1996; 5: 204–211.
5.
SouranderALeijalaHLehtiläAKanervaAHeleniusHPihaJ. Short-term child psychiatric inpatient treatment: Place of residence as one year outcome measure. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1996; 5: 38–43.
6.
SouranderAHukkanenRPihaJ. Mental health among children in children's homes and in psychiatric hospital. Psychiatria Fennica1997; 28: 183–191.
7.
SouranderAPihaJ. Three year follow-up of child psychiatric inpatient treatment. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1998; 7: 153–162.
8.
PatrickCPadgettDKBurnsBJSchlesingerHJCohenJ. Use of inpatient services by a national population: Do benefits make a difference?. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1993; 32: 144–152.
9.
JaffaTStottC. Do inpatients on adolescent units recover? A study of outcome and acceptability of treatment. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry1999; 8: 292–300.
10.
McCabeRRotheryDWrateRAspinJBryceJ. Diagnosis in adolescent inpatients: Diagnostic confidence and comparison of diagnoses using ICD-9 and DSM-III. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1996; 5: 147–154.
11.
RotheryDWrateRMcCabeRAspinJBryceG. Treatment goal planning: Outcome findings of a British prospective multi-centre study of adolescent inpatient units. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1995; 4: 209–221.
12.
WrateRRotheryDJMcCabeRJRAspinJBryceG. A prospective multi-centre study of admissions to adolescent psychiatry inpatient units. Journal of Adolescence1994; 17: 221–237.
13.
GowersSGHarringtonRCWhittonA. Brief scale for measuring outcomes of emotional and behavioural disorders in children: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoONSCA). British Journal of Psychiatry1999; 174: 413–416.
14.
WerryJ. Predicting completed suicides. Letter to the editor. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2007; 46: 1097.
