Objective: This paper traces the background of involvement and increasing external activity of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) in the policy and project area.
Conclusions: Throughout 2008, representatives of the RANZCP paused to review progress and celebrate successes in the implementation of the College's stated aim to develop an externally focussed policy agenda. A summary of key activities across the past 4–5 years is outlined, including the key leadership role undertaken by the RANZCP in the recent formation of the Mental Health Professionals Association's partnership. Tracing the history of the establishment of the RANZCP externally focussed policy functions, the paper provides details of the extensive range of projects and activities undertaken to date. Also highlighted is the broad range of resources that have been developed and are now available for College members including trainees. The progress achieved to date is reflective of RANZCP's deliberate strategic actions and intent to work more closely with others and take an increasingly active role in the development of mental health policy and service delivery standards across the Australian and New Zealand landscape. The functions are now embedded with the College's newly revised Strategic Plan.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RubensteinBRubensteinHC. Menders of the Mind: A History of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 1946–1996. Oxford University Press, Melbourne1996.
2.
PattersonC. Policy Options Discussion Paper. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Melbourne2002.
3.
FreidinJA. Policy Development Proposal. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Melbourne2002.
4.
EmmersonBFreidinJSaraGNewmanL. A Health Policy Unit: Why do we need one?. Australasian Psychiatry2004; 12: 103–104.
5.
RANZCP Working with the Community: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Strategic Plan 2009–2001. Melbourne: RANZCP, 2008.
6.
MorganK. The learning region; institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies1997; 31: 491–503.
7.
BrownieS. Literature Review: From Rhetoric to Reality: The New Zealand experience in implementing partnership-based public policy in local development contexts. Charles Sturt University, Whangarei2003; 42.
8.
ConsidineM. Changing the Way Government Works: New Interests – New Arrangements. Changing the Way Government Works Seminar, Melbourne2004.
9.
OECD. Successful Partnerships: A Guide. Paris: OECD, 2006.
10.
JacksonCLNicholsonCDaustCCheungLO'DonnellJ. Integration, Co-ordination & Multidisciplinary Care in Australia: Growth Via Optimal Governance Arrangements. The University of Queensland, Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Brisbane2006.
11.
StoneN. Coming in from the inter-professional cold in Australia. Australian Health Review2007; 31: 332–340.
12.
LomasJWoodsJVeenstraG. Devolving authority for health research care in Canada's provinces: An introduction to the issues. Canadian Medical Journal1997; 156: 371–377.
13.
CravenMBlandR. Better practices in collaborative mental health care: an Anallysis of the evidence base. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry2006; 51: 8–72.
14.
HallP. Inter-professional cultures as barriers. The Journal of Interpersonal Care2005; Suppl. 1: 188–196.
D'AmourDFerrada-VidelaMThe conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. The Journal of Interpersonal Care2005; Suppl. 1: 116–131.
17.
BrownieS. From Policy to Practice: The New Zealand Experience in Implementing Partnership-based Local Development Policy. Faculty of Business, Charles Sturt University, NSWAustralia2007.
18.
NelsonJZadekS. Partnership Alchemy. New Social Partnerships in Europe. The Copenhagen Centre, Copenhagen2003.
19.
BlackmanJ. Collaborate or be clobbered. CIO2002; 4: 50.
20.
Ashbridge Centre for Business and Society. Partnership definition, 2003. Available from, www.ashbridge.org.uk.
21.
OsborneSMurrayV. Collaboration between non-profit organizations in the provision of social services in Canada. Working together or falling apart?. The International Journal of Public Sector Management2000; 13: 9–18.
22.
ScottD. Inter-agency collaboration: Why is it so difficult? Can we do it better?. The National Children's Bureau of Australia1993; 18: 4–9.
23.
PichierriA. Concertation and local development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2002; 26: 689–706.
24.
DalzielP, GreerGRegional economic development planning: A study of its benefits and best practice. A report prepared for the Ministry of Economic Development, Agribusiness & Economics Research Unit. Christchurch: Lincoln University, 2003.
Pobal. Partnership Dynamics. Key Lessons from Local Partnership in Practice. Dublin: Department of Community, Rural and Goeltacht Affairs, 2006.
27.
Southern-Mental-Health. Working Together: A Short, Practical Guide for Consumers, Family Carers and Mental Health Professionals to Work Together in Collaboration and Partnership. Melbourne: Southern Mental Health Association Inc, 2006.
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Local Partnerships for Better Governance. Territorial Economy. Paris: OECD Publications, 2001.
29.
DalzielPSaundersC. Regional partnership for economic development. Economic development in New Zealand, RoweJ. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, HampshireEngland2005; 87–105.
30.
WeissJA. Pathways to cooperation among agencies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management1987; 7: 94–117.
31.
BardachE. On designing implementable programs. Pitfalls of Analysis, MajoneGQuadeE. John Wiley and Sons, London1980; 138–158.
32.
BardachE. Getting Agencies to Work Together: the Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftmanship. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC1998.
