Objective: The aim of this paper is to review research evidence and describe our experience of facilitated discharge from mental health services to primary care.
Method: A literature review of facilitated discharge was conducted. In addition, the clinical characteristics of 21 discharged and 21 non-discharged patients from one shared care service were compared in a retrospective file review. Thirty-one patients in another facilitated discharge program were surveyed.
Results: Discharged patients had a higher level of function. There was a trend towards discharged patients being female and employed with less chronic illness, involuntary treatment, behavioural symptoms, depot medication, triage contact, service contact with family, and more mood disorder. Of the 10 survey respondents, 60% reported feeling better compared with their last service contact, 70% felt not having contact was a good thing and most saw their doctors regularly and reported a good relationship.
Conclusions: There was a trend towards more stable patients being discharged and it appeared that they responded positively to this, without a clear indication of which factors best determine suitability for discharge. Consequently, we elected to incorporate discharge planning processes as a core function of case management and increase shared care with the primary care sector.
MeadowsGN. Overcoming barriers to reintegration of patients with schizophrenia: developing a best-practice model for discharge from specialist care. Medical Journal of Australia2003; 178(Suppl. 5)S53–S56.
2.
MeadowsGNHarveyCAJoubertLBartonDBediG. The consultation-liaison in primary-care psychiatry program: a structured approach to long-term collaboration. Psychiatric Services2007; 58: 1036–1038.
3.
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines Team for the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry2005; 39: 1–30.
4.
KeksNAAltsonBMSacksTLHustigHHTanaghowA. Collaboration between general practice and community psychiatric services for people with chronic mental illness. Medical Journal of Australia1997; 167: 266–271.
5.
BackusLWeinkoveJLucasMJespersenS. Outcome of planned discharge from case management: 3 year retrospective study. Australasian Psychiatry2008; 16: 33–38.
6.
GaskLCroftJ. Methods of working with primary care. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment2000; 6: 442–449.
7.
HornerDAsherK. General practitioners and mental health staff sharing patient care: working model. Australasian Psychiatry2005; 13: 176–180.
8.
RodenburgHBosVO'MalleyCMcGeorgePLoveTDowellA. General Practice care of enduring mental health problems: an evaluation of the Wellington Mental Health Liaison Service. The New Zealand Medical Journal2004; 117: U1077.
9.
MeadowsGN. Establishing a collaborative service model for primary mental health care. Medical Journal of Australia1998; 168: 162–165.
10.
MeadowsGJoubertLDonoghueJ. CLIPP (Consultation and Liaison in Primary-Care Psychiatry) Manual. Department of Human Services Victoria: Aged, Community and Mental Health Division, Melbourne, Victoria2000.
11.
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows Program). Version 14Chicago: SPSS.
12.
EisenSVWilcoxMLeffHSSchaeferECulhaneMA. Assessing behavioral health outcomes in outpatient programs: Reliability and validity of the BASIS-32. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research1999; 26: 5–17.
13.
Van der Feltz-CornelisCMVan OppenPVan MarwijkHWDe BeursEVan DyckR. A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation. General Hospital Psychiatry2004; 26: 115–120.
