Objectives: The aim of this paper was to explore the relationship between the personality traits of Australian General Practitioners (GPs) and their gender, work practice arrangements, and history of medico-legal matters.
Methods: A cross-sectional self report survey was mailed to 1239 GPs. There were 566 respondents (45.7% response rate to survey). The survey assessed personality traits (using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire), demographic and practice information, and history of medico-legal matters with any medical defence organization. The number and type of medico-legal matters was also extracted from the UNITED Medical Protection database.
Results: Male respondents had significantly higher psychoticism scores than females (p<0.001), and females had significantly higher neuroticism scores than males (p<0.01), as in community samples. However, for GPs who worked more than 48 hours per week, there were no gender differences in personality trait scores. Solo practitioners and non-solo practitioners did not differ on personality scores. Proceduralists and non-proceduralists did not differ on personality scores. However, a higher proportion of proceduralists experienced a medico-legal matter than non-proceduralists (p<0.001). There was a positive correlation between extraversion scores and doctors who attended peer review (p<0.001). There was no difference in the numbers of medico-legal matters for doctors who attended peer review. Males who self reported a medico-legal matter had higher neuroticism scores than the males who did not report medico-legal matters. This was not the case for females. For males, this pattern was not replicated when considering data from UNITED.
Conclusions: The known demographic and practice factors that differ for doctors having a medico-legal matter are replicated here – being male, a proceduralist and working longer hours. There is not a consistent pattern regarding personality traits and medico-legal matters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CunninghamWCrumpRTomlinA. The characteristics of doctors receiving medical complaints: a cross-sectional survey of doctors. New Zealand Medical Journal2003; 116(1183)U625.
2.
MelloMStuddertDCesrochesCCaring for patients in a malpractice crisis: Physician satisfaction and quality of care. Health Aff2004; 23: 42–53.
3.
AaslandAFordeR. Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors’ personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues. Qual Saf Health Care2005; 124: 13–17.
4.
HicksonGFederspielCPichertJMillerCGauld-JaegerJPrestonB. Patient complaints and malpractice risk. Journal of the American Medical Association2002; 287: 2951–2956.
5.
JohnsonW. Predisposition to emotional distress and psychiatric illness amongst doctors: The role of unconscious and experiential factors. British Journal of Medical Psychology1991; 64: 317–329.
6.
TyssenRVaglumP. Mental health problems among young doctors: an updated review of prospective studies. Harvard Rev Psychiatry2002; 10: 154–165.
7.
ClarkDCSalazar-GruescoEGrablerPFawcettJ. Predictors of depression during the first 6 months of internship. American Journal of Psychiatry1984; 141: 1095–1098.
8.
Firth-CozensJCordingHGinsburgR. Can we select health professionals who provide safer care. Quality and Safety in Health Care2003; 12: i16.
9.
Firth-CozensJGreenhalghJ. Doctors’ perceptions of the links between stress and lowered clinical care. Soc Ci Med1997; 44: 1017–1022.
10.
NewburyBirchDKamliF. Psychological stress, anxiety, depression, job satisfaction, and personality characteristics in preregistration house officers. Postgraduate Medical Journal2001; 77: 109–111.
11.
WillcockSDalyMTennantCAllardB. Burnout and pyschiatric morbidity in new medical graduates. Medical Journal of Australia2004; 181: 357–360.
12.
NashLCurtisBWaltonMWillcockSTennantC. The response of doctors to a formal complaint. Australas Psychiatry2006; 14: 246–250.
13.
NashLDalyMJohnsonMPsychological morbidity in Australian doctors who have and have not experienced a medico-legal matter: a cross sectional survey. Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry2007; 41: 917–925.
14.
EysenckHJEysenckSBG. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). Hodder and Stoughton, London1996.
15.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Medical Labour Force 2003. AIHW cat. No. HWL 32. Canberra: AIHW (National Health Labour Force Series No. 32), 2005.
