In the current review, an exceptional view on the multi-scale integrated computational modelling and data-driven methods in the Additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic materials in the framework of integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) is discussed. In the first part of the review, process simulation (P-S linkage), structure modelling (S-P linkage), property simulation (S-P linkage), and integrated modelling (PSP and PSPP linkages) are elaborated considering different physical phenomena (multi-physics) in AM and at micro/meso/macro scales (multi-scale modelling). The second part provides an extensive discussion of a data-driven framework, which involves extracting existing data from databases and texts, data pre-processing, high throughput screening, and, therefore, database construction. A data-driven workflow that integrates statistical methods, including ML, artificial intelligence (AI), and neural network (NN) models, has great potential for completing PSPP linkages. This review paper provides an insight for both academic and industrial researchers, working on the AM of metallic materials.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ElahiniaMHHashemiMTabeshMManufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2012;57:911–946.
2.
MogesTAmetaGWitherellP.A review of model inaccuracy and parameter uncertainty in laser powder Bed fusion models and simulations. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2019;141:040801 (14 pages). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042789
3.
HerderickE. Additive manufacturing of metals: a review. Proceedings of MS&T’11. Columbus, OH; 2011.
4.
YanWLinSKafkaOLData-driven multi-scale multi-physics models to derive process–structure–property relationships for additive manufacturing. Comput Mech. 2018;61:521–541.
5.
KamathC.On the Use of data mining techniques to build high-density, additively-manufactured parts. In: LookmanTAlexanderFJRajanK, editor. Information science for materials discovery and design. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 141–155.
6.
SmithJXiongWYanWLinking process, structure, property, and performance for metal-based additive manufacturing: computational approaches with experimental support. Comput Mech. 2016;57:583–610.
7.
FrazierWE.Metal additive manufacturing: A review. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23:1917–1928.
8.
MartinBWAlesTKRolchigoMR17 - Developing and applying ICME + modeling tools to predict performance of additively manufactured aerospace parts. In: FroesFBoyerR, editors. Additive manufacturing for the aerospace industry. Cambridge: Elsevier; 2019. p. 375–400.
9.
AttallahMMJenningsRWangXAdditive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys: The outstanding issues. MRS Bull. 2016;41:758–764.
10.
ChauvetEKontisPJägleEAHot cracking mechanism affecting a non-weldable Ni-based superalloy produced by selective electron beam melting. Acta Mater. 2018;142:82–94.
11.
YakoutMCadamuroAElbestawiMAThe selection of process parameters in additive manufacturing for aerospace alloys. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2017;92:2081–2098.
12.
ZhangFLevineLEAllenAJEffect of heat treatment on the microstructural evolution of a nickel-based superalloy additive-manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Acta Mater. 2018;152:200–214.
13.
NematollahiMTokerGSaghaianSEAdditive manufacturing of Ni-rich NiTiHf20: manufacturability, composition, density, and transformation behavior. Shape Memory Superelast. 2019;5:113–124.
14.
CaiazzoFAlfieriVCorradoGLaser powder-bed fusion of Inconel 718 to manufacture turbine blades. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2017;93:4023–4031.
15.
ParviziSHashemiSMAsgariniaFEffective parameters on the final properties of NiTi-based alloys manufactured by powder metallurgy methods: A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2020;100739.
16.
GorsseSHutchinsonCGounéMAdditive manufacturing of metals: a brief review of the characteristic microstructures and properties of steels, Ti-6Al-4V and high-entropy alloys. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18:584–610.
17.
AnsariMJNguyenDSParkHS.Investigation of SLM process in terms of temperature distribution and melting pool size: modeling and experimental approaches. Materials (Basel). 2019;12.
18.
SingSLAnJYeongWYLaser and electron-beam powder-bed additive manufacturing of metallic implants: a review on processes, materials and designs. J Orthop Res. 2016;34:369–385.
19.
SchoinochoritisBChantzisDSalonitisK.Simulation of metallic powder bed additive manufacturing processes with the finite element method: A critical review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2017;231:96–117.
FrancoisMMSunAKingWE Modeling of additive manufacturing processes for metals: challenges and opportunities. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. 2017:Medium: ED; Size: p. 198–206.
22.
DebRoyTWeiHLZubackJSAdditive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;92:112–224.
23.
StavropoulosPFoteinopoulosP.Modelling of additive manufacturing processes: a review and classification. Manufact Rev. 2018;5:2.
24.
GePZhangZTanZJAn integrated modeling of process-structure-property relationship in laser additive manufacturing of duplex titanium alloy. Int J Therm Sci. 2019;140:329–343.
25.
VastolaGPeiQXZhangYW.Predictive model for porosity in powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing at high beam energy regime. Additive Manufact. 2018;22:817–822.
26.
LeungCLATosiRMuzangazaEEffect of preheating on the thermal, microstructural and mechanical properties of selective electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V components. Mater Des. 2019;174:107792.
27.
KantzosCACunninghamRWTariVCharacterization of metal additive manufacturing surfaces using synchrotron X-ray CT and micromechanical modeling. Comput Mech. 2018;61:575–580.
28.
CunninghamRNarraSPMontgomeryCSynchrotron-Based X-ray Microtomography characterization of the effect of processing variables on porosity formation in laser power-Bed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. JOM. 2017;69:479–484.
29.
SterlingAShamsaeiNTorriesBFatigue Behaviour of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Procedia Eng. 2015;133:576–589.
30.
ShamsaeiNYadollahiABianLAn overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; part II: mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control. Additive Manufact. 2015;8:12–35.
31.
KeshavarzkermaniAEsmaeilizadehRAliUControlling mechanical properties of additively manufactured hastelloy X by altering solidification pattern during laser powder-bed fusion. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;762:138081.
32.
ChenZXiangYWeiZThermal dynamic behavior during selective laser melting of K418 superalloy: numerical simulation and experimental verification. Appl Phys A. 2018;124:313.
33.
KeshavarzkermaniAMarzbanradEEsmaeilizadehRAn investigation into the effect of process parameters on melt pool geometry, cell spacing, and grain refinement during laser powder bed fusion. Opt Laser Technol. 2019;116:83–91.
34.
KingWEAndersonATFerenczRMLaser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev. 2015;2:041304.
35.
KhairallahSAAndersonATRubenchikALaser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater. 2016;108:36–45.
36.
AkramJChalavadiPPalDUnderstanding grain evolution in additive manufacturing through modeling. Additive Manufact. 2018;21:255–268.
37.
ZinovievAZinovievaOPloshikhinVEvolution of grain structure during laser additive manufacturing. simulation by a cellular automata method. Mater Des. 2016;106:321–329.
38.
MokhtarianHCoatanéaEParisHA Conceptual design and modeling framework for integrated additive manufacturing. J Mech Des. 2018;140:081101 (13 pages). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040163
39.
International A. Standard specification for titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium alloy castings for surgical Implants (UNS R56406). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2014.
40.
International A. Standard Specification for wrought titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium alloy for surgical implant applications (UNS R56400). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2014.
41.
International A. Standard Specification for titanium and titanium alloy Forgings. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2019.
42.
Defense USDo. Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures: U.S. Department of Defense; 1998.
43.
KoikeMMartinezKGuoLEvaluation of titanium alloy fabricated using electron beam melting system for dental applications. J Mater Process Technol. 2011;211:1400–1408.
44.
KoikeMGreerPOwenKEvaluation of titanium alloys fabricated using rapid prototyping technologies—electron beam melting and laser beam melting. Materials (Basel). 2011;4:1776–1792.
45.
Arcam Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy Datasheet.
46.
EOS 3D Printing Metal Materials: Ti64, Ti64ELI, and TiCP; Titanium for Additive Manufacturing.
47.
KobrynPAS. S.L. Mechanical Properties of Laser-Deposited Ti-6Al-4V. 2001 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. The University of Texas at Austin 2001.
48.
RafiHKKarthikNVGongHMicrostructures and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V parts fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. J Mater Eng Perform. 2013;22:3872–3883.
49.
ChenBMoonSKYaoXStrength and strain hardening of a selective laser melted AlSi10Mg alloy. Scr Mater. 2017;141:45–49.
50.
SimonelliMTseYYTuckC.Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;616:1–11.
GuoGCXLiuWK.Report of the workshop predictive theoretical, computational and experimental approaches for additive manufacturing (WAM 2016). SpringerBriefs Appl Sci Technol. 2018;1–88.
53.
MarkFHorstemeyerSS.Definition of ICME integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) for metals. Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley & Sons Inc.,2018. p. 1–17.
54.
Wang WYLiJLiuWIntegrated computational materials engineering for advanced materials: A brief review. Comput Mater Sci. 2019;158:42–48.
55.
PinomaaTYashchukILindroosMProcess-Structure-Properties-Performance modeling for selective laser melting. Metals (Basel). 2019;9:1138.
56.
PiresP-ADesmaisonOMegahedM.ICME manufacturability assessment in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. JOM. 2018;70:1677–1685.
57.
MegahedMMindtH-WN’DriNMetal additive-manufacturing process and residual stress modeling. Integrat Mater Manufact Innovat. 2016;5:61–93.
58.
YanWLinSKafkaOLModeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing. Front Mech Eng. 2018;13:482–492.
59.
MahamoodRMAkinlabiET.Modelling and optimization of laser additive manufacturing process of Ti alloy composite. In: GuptaKGuptaMK, editor. Optimization of manufacturing processes. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 91–109.
60.
GlammRJRosenbladtDMPripsteinED Recent progress in implementation of ICME for metallic materials in the airframe industry. 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Kissimmee, Florida 2015.
61.
SeufzerWJ. Additive manufacturing modeling and simulation: a literature review for electron beam free form fabrication. NASA/TM; 2014-218245. 2014.
62.
RobertsIAWangCJEsterleinRA three-dimensional finite element analysis of the temperature field during laser melting of metal powders in additive layer manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2009;49:916–923.
63.
LohL-EChuaC-KYeongW-YNumerical investigation and an effective modelling on the selective laser melting (SLM) process with aluminium alloy 6061. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;80:288–300.
64.
MichalerisP.Modeling metal deposition in heat transfer analyses of additive manufacturing processes. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2014;86:51–60.
65.
HeigelJCMichalerisPReutzelEW.Thermo-mechanical model development and validation of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V. Additive Manufact. 2015;5:9–19.
66.
ChenQGuillemotGGandinC-AThree-dimensional finite element thermomechanical modeling of additive manufacturing by selective laser melting for ceramic materials. Additive Manufact. 2017;16:124–137.
67.
ManvatkarVDeADebRoyT.Heat transfer and material flow during laser assisted multi-layer additive manufacturing. J Appl Phys. 2014;116:124905.
68.
GanZLiuHLiSModeling of thermal behavior and mass transport in multi-layer laser additive manufacturing of Ni-based alloy on cast iron. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;111:709–722.
69.
RasheedASanOKvamsdalT.Digital Twin: values, challenges and Enablers from a modeling Perspective. IEEE Access. 2020;8:21980–22012.
70.
LiJJinRYuHZ.Integration of physically-based and data-driven approaches for thermal field prediction in additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2018;139:473–485.
71.
QiXChenGLiYApplying neural-network-based machine learning to additive manufacturing: current applications, challenges, and future Perspectives. Engineering. 2019;5:721–729.
72.
GongXChouK.Phase-Field modeling of microstructure evolution in electron beam additive manufacturing. JOM. 2015;67:1176–1182.
73.
FallahVAmoorezaeiMProvatasNPhase-field simulation of solidification morphology in laser powder deposition of Ti–Nb alloys. Acta Mater. 2012;60:1633–1646.
74.
ZhaoJWangGXYeCA numerical model coupling diffusion and grain growth in nanocrystalline materials. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;136:243–252.
75.
HuangWLinX.Research Progress in laser solid forming of high-performance metallic components at the state key laboratory of solidification processing of China. 3D Printing Additive Manufact. 2014;1:156–165.
76.
RodgersTMMadisonJDTikareV.Simulation of metal additive manufacturing microstructures using kinetic Monte Carlo. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;135:78–89.
77.
PopovaERodgersTMGongXProcess-Structure linkages using a data science approach: application to simulated additive manufacturing data. Integrat Mater Manufact Innovat. 2017;6:54–68.
78.
LiangY-JChengXLiJMicrostructural control during laser additive manufacturing of single-crystal nickel-base superalloys: New processing–microstructure maps involving powder feeding. Mater Des. 2017;130:197–207.
79.
NiePOjoOALiZ.Numerical modeling of microstructure evolution during laser additive manufacturing of a nickel-based superalloy. Acta Mater. 2014;77:85–95.
80.
AhmadiA. A Micromechanical-based computational framework for modeling the mechanical properties of the metallic parts fabricated by selective laser melting. University of Toledo; 2016.
81.
MandollaCPetruzzelliAMPercocoGBuilding a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry. Comput Ind. 2019;109:134–152.
82.
LeeYTZhuangJRHsiehWHFEM simulations to study the effects of laser power and scan speed on molten pool size in additive manufacturing. Int J Mech Mechatron Eng. 2017;11:1291–1295.
83.
ChenHWeiQWenSFlow behavior of powder particles in layering process of selective laser melting: numerical modeling and experimental verification based on discrete element method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2017;123:146–159.
84.
ZhaoSLiSJHouWTThe influence of cell morphology on the compressive fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;59:251–264.
85.
LiCLiuJFFangXYEfficient predictive model of part distortion and residual stress in selective laser melting. Additive Manufact. 2017;17:157–168.
86.
ZhangYLeeWHWuL7 - Multiscale multiphysics modeling of laser powder bed fusion process. In: ZhangJJungY-G, editors. Additive manufacturing. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018. p. 215–259.
87.
LiSXiaoHLiuKMelt-pool motion, temperature variation and dendritic morphology of Inconel 718 during pulsed- and continuous-wave laser additive manufacturing: a comparative study. Mater Des. 2017;119:351–360.
88.
SharmaSMandalVRamakrishnaSANumerical simulation of melt pool oscillations and protuberance in pulsed laser micro melting of SS304 for surface texturing applications. J Manuf Process. 2019;39:282–294.
89.
LuXLinXChiumentiMIn situ measurements and thermo-mechanical simulation of Ti–6Al–4V laser solid forming processes. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;153-154:119–130.
90.
DenlingerERIrwinJMichalerisP.Thermomechanical modeling of additive manufacturing large parts. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2014;136:061007 (8 pages). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028669
91.
DenlingerERMichalerisP.Effect of stress relaxation on distortion in additive manufacturing process modeling. Additive Manufact. 2016;12:51–59.
92.
MukherjeeTWeiHLDeAHeat and fluid flow in additive manufacturing – part II: powder bed fusion of stainless steel, and titanium, nickel and aluminum base alloys. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;150:369–380.
93.
GaneriwalaR.Multiphysics modeling of selective laser sintering/melting. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 2015.
YeQChenS.Numerical modeling of metal-based additive manufacturing process using level Set methods. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2017;139:071019 (8 pages).
96.
MukherjeeTManvatkarVDeAMitigation of thermal distortion during additive manufacturing. Scr Mater. 2017;127:79–83.
97.
PapadakisLLoizouARisseJA computational reduction model for appraising structural effects in selective laser melting manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2014;9:17–25.
98.
LeeYSKirkaMMDinwiddieRBRole of scan strategies on thermal gradient and solidification rate in electron beam powder bed fusion. Additive Manufact. 2018;22:516–527.
99.
HuangWZhangY.Finite element simulation of thermal behavior in single-track multiple-layers thin wall without-support during selective laser melting. J Manuf Process. 2019;42:139–148.
100.
FayazfarHSalarianMRogalskyAA critical review of powder-based additive manufacturing of ferrous alloys: process parameters, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Des. 2018;144:98–128.
101.
SantosLSGuptaSKBruckHA.Simulation of buckling of internal features during selective laser sintering of metals. Additive Manufact. 2018;23:235–245.
102.
ChengBPriceSLydonJOn process temperature in powder-bed electron beam additive manufacturing: model development and validation. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2014;136:061018 (12 pages).
103.
LiJ-QFanT-H.Phase-field modeling of metallic powder-substrate interaction in laser melting process. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;133:872–884.
104.
YangYRagnvaldsenOBaiY3D non-isothermal phase-field simulation of microstructure evolution during selective laser sintering. NPJ Computat Mater. 2019;5:1–12.
105.
XiangZYinMDongGModeling of the thermal physical process and study on the reliability of linear energy density for selective laser melting. Results in Physics. 2018;9:939–946.
106.
LindgrenL-ELundbäckAFiskMSimulation of additive manufacturing using coupled constitutive and microstructure models. Additive Manufact. 2016;12:144–158.
107.
GougeMMichalerisP.Chapter 1 – an Introduction to additive manufacturing processes and their modeling challenges. In: GougeMMichalerisP, editors. Thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018. p. 3–18.
108.
SamantarayMSahooSThatoiD.Computational modeling of heat transfer and sintering behavior during direct metal laser sintering of AlSi10Mg alloy powder. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 2018;346:1043–1054.
109.
PromoppatumPYaoS-C.Influence of scanning length and energy input on residual stress reduction in metal additive manufacturing: numerical and experimental studies. J Manuf Process. 2020;49:247–259.
110.
ZargarianAEsfahanianMKadkhodapourJNumerical simulation of the fatigue behavior of additive manufactured titanium porous lattice structures. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;60:339–347.
111.
HedayatiRSadighiMMohammadi-AghdamMMechanical properties of regular porous biomaterials made from truncated cube repeating unit cells: analytical solutions and computational models. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;60:163–183.
112.
MirkoohiENingJBocchiniPThermal modeling of temperature distribution in metal additive manufacturing considering effects of build layers, Latent heat, and temperature-sensitivity of material properties. J Manufact Mater Process. 2018;2:63.
113.
LaaksoPRiipinenTLaukkanenAOptimization and simulation of SLM process for high density H13 tool steel parts. Phys Procedia. 2016;83:26–35.
114.
WangPLeiHZhuXInfluence of manufacturing geometric defects on the mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. J Alloys Compd. 2019;789:852–859.
115.
TapiaGElwanyAHSangH.Prediction of porosity in metal-based additive manufacturing using spatial Gaussian process models. Additive Manufact. 2016;12:282–290.
116.
XiaMGuDYuGPorosity evolution and its thermodynamic mechanism of randomly packed powder-bed during selective laser melting of Inconel 718 alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2017;116:96–106.
117.
GuanXZhaoYF.Modeling of the laser powder–based directed energy deposition process for additive manufacturing: a review. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2020;107:1959–1982.
118.
BikasHStavropoulosPChryssolourisG.Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2016;83:389–405.
119.
GougeMMichalerisPDenlingerEChapter 2 – The finite element method for the thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing processes. In: GougeMMichalerisP, editors. Thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018. p. 19–38.
120.
MasoomiMThompsonSMShamsaeiN.Laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V parts: thermal modeling and mechanical implications. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2017;118-119:73–90.
121.
GougeM. Chapter 3 – Convection Boundary Losses During Laser Cladding✶✶This chapter is based upon the original work: MoF Gouge, JC Heigel, P Michaleris, and TA Palmer, “Modeling forced convection in the thermal simulation of laser cladding processes.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 79.1-4 (2015): 307–320. Originally published by ASME. In: Gouge M, Michaleris P, editors. Thermo-Mechanical Modeling of Additive Manufacturing: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018. p. 41–60.
122.
AntonyKArivazhaganNSenthilkumaranK.Numerical and experimental investigations on laser melting of stainless steel 316L metal powders. J Manuf Process. 2014;16:345–355.
123.
ZhangJLiouFSeufzerWA coupled finite element cellular automaton model to predict thermal history and grain morphology of Ti-6Al-4V during direct metal deposition (DMD). Additive Manufact. 2016;11:32–39.
124.
LiuJToAC.Quantitative texture prediction of epitaxial columnar grains in additive manufacturing using selective laser melting. Additive Manufact. 2017;16:58–64.
125.
WeiHLMukherjeeTDebRoyT.Grain growth modeling for additive manufacturing of nickel based superalloys. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 265–269.
126.
TanXKokYTanYJAn experimental and simulation study on build thickness dependent microstructure for electron beam melted Ti–6Al–4 V. J Alloys Compd. 2015;646:303–309.
127.
BabuB. Mechanism-based flow stress model for Ti-6Al-4V: applicable for simulation of additive manufacturing and machining [Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology; 2018.
128.
KörnerCAttarEHeinlP.Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes. J Mater Process Technol. 2011;211:978–987.
129.
KiHMohantyPSMazumderJ.Modelling of high-density laser-material interaction using fast level set method. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2001;34:364–372.
130.
VastolaGZhangGPeiQXModeling the microstructure evolution during additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V: a comparison between electron beam melting and selective laser melting. JOM. 2016;68:1370–1375.
131.
VastolaGZhangGPeiQXControlling of residual stress in additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4 V by finite element modeling. Additive Manufact. 2016;12:231–239.
132.
WirthFWegenerK.A physical modeling and predictive simulation of the laser cladding process. Additive Manufact. 2018;22:307–319.
133.
LeeYSZhangW.Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Additive Manufact. 2016;12:178–188.
134.
TsengC-CLiC-J.Numerical investigation of interfacial dynamics for the melt pool of Ti-6Al-4V powders under a selective laser. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;134:906–919.
135.
WirthFWegenerK.Simulation of the multi-component process gas flow for the explanation of oxidation during laser cladding. Additive Manufact. 2018;24:249–256.
136.
PanwisawasCQiuCAndersonMJMesoscale modelling of selective laser melting: thermal fluid dynamics and microstructural evolution. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;126:479–490.
137.
MasoomiMPeguesJWThompsonSMA numerical and experimental investigation of convective heat transfer during laser-powder bed fusion. Additive Manufact. 2018;22:729–745.
138.
PromoppatumPOnlerRYaoS-C.Numerical and experimental investigations of micro and macro characteristics of direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V products. J Mater Process Technol. 2017;240:262–273.
139.
LianYGanZYuCA cellular automaton finite volume method for microstructure evolution during additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2019;169:107672.
140.
WangXLiuPJiYInvestigation on microsegregation of IN718 alloy during additive manufacturing via integrated phase-field and finite-element modeling. J Mater Eng Perform. 2019;28:657–665.
141.
AcharyaRSharonJAStaroselskyA.Prediction of microstructure in laser powder bed fusion process. Acta Mater. 2017;124:360–371.
142.
SahooSChouK. Review on phase-field modeling of microstructure evolutions: application to electron beam additive manufacturing. ASME 2014 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the JSME 2014 International Conference on Materials and Processing and the 42nd North American Manufacturing Research Conference 2014.
143.
ShinYCBaileyNKatinasCPredictive modeling capabilities from incident powder and laser to mechanical properties for laser directed energy deposition. Comput Mech. 2018;61:617–636.
144.
WangXChouK.Microstructure simulations of Inconel 718 during selective laser melting using a phase field model. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2019;100:2147–2162.
145.
KarayagizKJohnsonLSeedeR Finite interface dissipation phase field modeling of Ni-Nb under additive manufacturing conditions 2019.
146.
LuL-XSridharNZhangY-W.Phase field simulation of powder bed-based additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2018;144:801–809.
147.
LiJ-QFanT-HTaniguchiTPhase-field modeling on laser melting of a metallic powder. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;117:412–424.
148.
ZhaoHZhangGYinZThree-dimensional finite element analysis of thermal stress in single-pass multi-layer weld-based rapid prototyping. J Mater Process Technol. 2012;212:276–285.
149.
SahooSChouK.Phase-field simulation of microstructure evolution of Ti–6Al–4V in electron beam additive manufacturing process. Additive Manufact. 2016;9:14–24.
150.
KirkaMMNandwanaPLeeYSolidification and solid-state transformation sciences in metals additive manufacturing. Scr Mater. 2017;135:130–134.
151.
KundinJMushongeraLEmmerichH.Phase-field modeling of microstructure formation during rapid solidification in Inconel 718 superalloy. Acta Mater. 2015;95:343–356.
152.
WuLZhangJ.Phase field simulation of dendritic solidification of Ti-6Al-4V during additive manufacturing process. JOM. 2018;70:2392–2399.
153.
WolframS.Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature. 1984;311:419–424.
154.
LiuYBaudinTPenelleR.Simulation of normal grain growth by cellular automata. Scr Mater. 1996;34:1679–1683.
155.
KörnerCBauereißAAttarE.Fundamental consolidation mechanisms during selective beam melting of powders. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2013;21:085011.
156.
RaiAHelmerHKörnerC.Simulation of grain structure evolution during powder bed based additive manufacturing. Additive Manufact. 2017;13:124–134.
157.
RaiAMarklMKörnerC.A coupled cellular automaton–lattice Boltzmann model for grain structure simulation during additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;124:37–48.
158.
GilmerGH.Computer models of crystal growth. Science. 1980;208:355–363.
159.
ZhangZTanZJYaoXXNumerical methods for microstructural evolutions in laser additive manufacturing. Comput Math Appl. 2019;78:2296–2307.
160.
LiWSoshiM.Modeling analysis of the effect of laser transverse speed on grain morphology during directed energy deposition process. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2019;103:3279–3291.
161.
RodgersTMBishopJEMadisonJD.Direct numerical simulation of mechanical response in synthetic additively manufactured microstructures. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2018;26:055010.
162.
SunZTanXTorSBSimultaneously enhanced strength and ductility for 3D-printed stainless steel 316L by selective laser melting. NPG Asia Mater. 2018;10:127.
163.
MohantySHattelJH.Numerical model based reliability estimation of selective laser melting process. Phys Procedia. 2014;56:379–389.
164.
LianYLinSYanWA parallelized three-dimensional cellular automaton model for grain growth during additive manufacturing. Comput Mech. 2018;61:543–558.
165.
ZhangWTongMHarrisonNM.Resolution, energy and time dependency on layer scaling in finite element modelling of laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manufact. 2019;28:610–620.
166.
CrialesLEArısoyYMLaneBPredictive modeling and optimization of multi-track processing for laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625. Additive Manufact. 2017;13:14–36.
AliHGhadbeigiHMumtazK.Processing parameter effects on residual stress and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4 V. J Mater Eng Perform. 2018;27:4059–4068.
169.
CrialesLEArısoyYMÖzelT.Sensitivity analysis of material and process parameters in finite element modeling of selective laser melting of Inconel 625. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2016;86:2653–2666.
170.
TapiaGKhairallahSMatthewsMGaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2018;94:3591–3603.
171.
YuanWChenHChengTEffects of laser scanning speeds on different states of the molten pool during selective laser melting: simulation and experiment. Mater Des. 2020;189:108542.
172.
ManvatkarVDeADebroyT.Spatial variation of melt pool geometry, peak temperature and solidification parameters during laser assisted additive manufacturing process. Mater Sci Technol. 2015;31:924–930.
173.
ZafarMQWuCCZhaoHFinite element framework for electron beam melting process simulation. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2020;109:2095–2112.
174.
DunbarAJDenlingerERGougeMFExperimental validation of finite element modeling for laser powder bed fusion deformation. Additive Manufact. 2016;12:108–120.
175.
YanZLiuWTangZReview on thermal analysis in laser-based additive manufacturing. Opt Laser Technol. 2018;106:427–441.
176.
WangZDenlingerEMichalerisPResidual stress mapping in Inconel 625 fabricated through additive manufacturing: method for neutron diffraction measurements to validate thermomechanical model predictions. Mater Des. 2017;113:169–177.
177.
Le RouxSSalemMHorA.Improvement of the bridge curvature method to assess residual stresses in selective laser melting. Additive Manufact. 2018;22:320–329.
178.
LuoZZhaoY.A survey of finite element analysis of temperature and thermal stress fields in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manufact. 2018;21:318–332.
179.
DenlingerER. Chapter 9 – residual stress and distortion modeling of electron beam direct manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V✶✶This chapter is based upon the original work: Denlinger, Erik R., Jarred C. Heigel, and Pan Michaleris. “Residual stress and distortion modeling of electron beam direct manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 229.10 (2015): 1803–1813. In: Gouge M, Michaleris P, editors. Thermo-Mechanical Modeling of Additive Manufacturing: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018. p. 153-66.
180.
DingJColegrovePMehnenJThermo-mechanical analysis of wire and arc additive layer manufacturing process on large multi-layer parts. Comput Mater Sci. 2011;50:3315–3322.
181.
AfazovSDenmarkWADLazaro TorallesBDistortion prediction and compensation in selective laser melting. Additive Manufact. 2017;17:15–22.
182.
StenderMEBeghiniLLSugarJDA thermal-mechanical finite element workflow for directed energy deposition additive manufacturing process modeling. Additive Manufact. 2018;21:556–566.
183.
SongJZhangLWuWUnderstanding processing parameters affecting residual stress in selective laser melting of Inconel 718 through numerical modeling. J Mater Res. 2019;34:1395–1404.
184.
PrabhakarPSamesWJDehoffRComputational modeling of residual stress formation during the electron beam melting process for Inconel 718. Additive Manufact. 2015;7:83–91.
185.
LuXLinXChiumentiMResidual stress and distortion of rectangular and S-shaped Ti-6Al-4V parts by directed energy deposition: Modelling and experimental calibration. Additive Manufacturing. 2019;26:166–179.
186.
LuX. Numerical simulation on thermo-mechanical coupling behaviors of laser solid forming Ti-6Al-4V; 2019.
187.
WilliamsRJDaviesCMHooperPA.A pragmatic part scale model for residual stress and distortion prediction in powder bed fusion. Additive Manufact. 2018;22:416–425.
188.
MukherjeeTZhangWDebRoyT.An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;126:360–372.
189.
LuXLinXChiumentiMFinite element analysis and experimental validation of the thermomechanical behavior in laser solid forming of Ti-6Al-4V. Additive Manufact. 2018;21:30–40.
190.
GalatiMIulianoLSalmiAModelling energy source and powder properties for the development of a thermal FE model of the EBM additive manufacturing process. Additive Manufact. 2017;14:49–59.
191.
DenlingerERJagdaleVSrinivasanGThermal modeling of Inconel 718 processed with powder bed fusion and experimental validation using in situ measurements. Additive Manufact. 2016;11:7–15.
192.
SchänzelMShakirovDIlinACoupled thermo-mechanical process simulation method for selective laser melting considering phase transformation steels. Comput Math Appl. 2019;78:2230–2246.
193.
RedfordJAGueguinMNguyenMCCalibration of a numerical prediction methodology for fretting-fatigue crack initiation in overhead power lines. Int J Fatigue. 2019;124:400–410.
194.
LevesqueFGoudreauSCloutierLFinite element model of the contact between a vibrating conductor and a suspension clamp. Tribol Int. 2011;44:1014–1023.
195.
SoldnerDMergheimJ.Thermal modelling of selective beam melting processes using heterogeneous time step sizes. Comput Math Appl. 2019;78:2183–2196.
196.
PatilNPalDRafiHA Generalized feed forward dynamic adaptive mesh refinement and derefinement finite element framework for metal laser sintering—part I: Formulation and algorithm development. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2015;137.
197.
DenlingerERGougeMIrwinJThermomechanical model development and in situ experimental validation of the laser powder-Bed fusion process. Additive Manufacturing. 2017;16:73–80.
198.
ChiumentiMNeivaESalsiENumerical modelling and experimental validation in selective laser melting. Additive Manufact. 2017;18:171–185.
199.
ZhangQXieJLondonTEstimates of the mechanical properties of laser powder bed fusion Ti-6Al-4V parts using finite element models. Mater Des. 2019;169:107678.
200.
NieZWangGMcGuffin-CawleyJDExperimental study and modeling of H13 steel deposition using laser hot-wire additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;235:171–186.
201.
VastolaGZhangGPeiQXModeling and control of remelting in high-energy beam additive manufacturing. Additive Manufact. 2015;7:57–63.
202.
LiuPWangZXiaoYInsight into the mechanisms of columnar to equiaxed grain transition during metallic additive manufacturing. Additive Manufact. 2019;26:22–29.
203.
RaghavanNDehoffRPannalaSNumerical modeling of heat-transfer and the influence of process parameters on tailoring the grain morphology of IN718 in electron beam additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2016;112:303–314.
204.
SeidelCZaehMF.Multi-scale Modelling approach for Contributing to reduced distortion in parts made by laser-based powder Bed fusion. Procedia CIRP. 2018;67:197–202.
205.
LiCLiuJGuoY.Prediction of residual stress and part distortion in selective laser melting. Procedia Cirp. 2016;45:171–174.
206.
GuDMaCXiaMA multiscale understanding of the thermodynamic and kinetic mechanisms of laser additive manufacturing. Engineering. 2017;3:675–684.
207.
TadanoSHinoTNakataniY.A modeling study of stress and strain formation induced during melting process in powder-bed electron beam melting for Ni superalloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;257:163–169.
208.
ZhangJZhangYLeeWHA multi-scale multi-physics modeling framework of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Met Powder Rep. 2018;73:151–157.
209.
YanWGeWSmithJMulti-scale modeling of electron beam melting of functionally graded materials. Acta Mater. 2016;115:403–412.
210.
LiuPWJiYZWangZInvestigation on evolution mechanisms of site-specific grain structures during metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;257:191–202.
211.
JiYChenLChenL-Q.Chapter 6 – understanding microstructure evolution during additive manufacturing of metallic alloys using phase-field modeling. In: GougeMMichalerisP, editors. Thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018. p. 93–116.
212.
LiCFuCHGuoYBA multiscale modeling approach for fast prediction of part distortion in selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;229:703–712.
213.
LiXTanW.Numerical investigation of effects of nucleation mechanisms on grain structure in metal additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;153:159–169.
214.
MohamedYNabilKAlaaNMultiscale experimental and modelling framework for metal additive manufacturing: Hip implant case study. J Eng Sci Milit Technol. 2019;3:23–30.
215.
JammalAWangGJiaXinZMulti-scale modelling of solidification and microstructure evolution in laser-deposition of T15 high speed steel. J Manuf Process. 2020;50:24–33.
216.
LeitzKHGrohsCSingerPFundamental analysis of the influence of powder characteristics in selective laser melting of molybdenum based on a multi-physical simulation model. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater. 2018;72:1–8.
217.
BrusaESesanaROssolaE.Numerical modeling and testing of mechanical behavior of AM titanium alloy bracket for aerospace applications. Procedia Struct Integrity. 2017;5:753–760.
218.
ZhangX-YFangGZhouJ.Additively manufactured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and the prediction of their mechanical behavior: a review. Materials (Basel). 2017;10:50.
219.
SchaedlerTACarterWB.Architected cellular materials. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2016;46:187–210.
220.
SteubenJCBirnbaumAJMichopoulosJGEnriched analytical solutions for additive manufacturing modeling and simulation. Additive Manufact. 2019;25:437–447.
221.
ManiMLaneBDonmezMA review on measurement science needs for real-time control of additive manufacturing metal powder bed fusion processes. Int J Prod Res. 2016;55:1–19.
222.
CarvalhoMSMartinsAPSantosTG.Simulation and validation of thermography inspection for components produced by additive manufacturing. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;159:113872.
223.
KurzWRappazMTrivediR. Progress in modelling solidification microstructures in metals and alloys. Part II: dendrites from 2001 to 2018. International Materials Reviews. 2020:1–47.
224.
HodgeNEFerenczRMVignesRM.Experimental comparison of residual stresses for a thermomechanical model for the simulation of selective laser melting. Additive Manufacturing. 2016;12:159–168.
225.
BieglerMGrafBRethmeierM.In-situ distortions in LMD additive manufacturing walls can be measured with digital image correlation and predicted using numerical simulations. Additive Manufact. 2018;20:101–110.
226.
WalkerTRBennettCJLeeTLA validated analytical-numerical modelling strategy to predict residual stresses in single-track laser deposited IN718. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;151:609–621.
227.
YuTLiMBreauxAExperimental and numerical study on residual stress and geometric distortion in powder bed fusion process. J Manuf Process. 2019;46:214–224.
228.
BieglerMMarkoAGrafBFinite element analysis of in-situ distortion and bulging for an arbitrarily curved additive manufacturing directed energy deposition geometry. Additive Manufact. 2018;24:264–272.
229.
NikamSJainN.Modeling and prediction of residual stresses in additive layer manufacturing by microplasma transferred arc process using finite element simulation. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2019;141:061003 (14 pages).
230.
GalatiMSnisAIulianoL.Experimental validation of a numerical thermal model of the EBM process for Ti6Al4 V. Comput Math Appl. 2019;78:2417–2427.
231.
PlotkowskiAKirkaMMBabuSS.Verification and validation of a rapid heat transfer calculation methodology for transient melt pool solidification conditions in powder bed metal additive manufacturing. Additive Manufact. 2017;18:256–268.
232.
KumaraCDengDHanningFPredicting the microstructural evolution of electron beam melting of alloy 718 with phase-field modeling. Metall Mater Trans A. 2019;50:2527–2537.
233.
GengRDuJWeiZAn adaptive-domain-growth method for phase field simulation of dendrite growth in arc preheated fused-coating additive manufacturing. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1063:012077.
234.
SahooS.Microstructure simulation of Ti-6Al-4V biomaterial produced by electron beam additive manufacturing process. Int J Nano Biomater. 2014;5:228.
235.
TripathySChinCLondonT Process modeling and validation of powder bed metal additive manufacturing; 2017.
236.
ZinovievaOZinovievAPloshikhinV.Three-dimensional modeling of the microstructure evolution during metal additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;141:207–220.
237.
YangJYuHYangHPrediction of microstructure in selective laser melted Ti6Al4V alloy by cellular automaton. J Alloys Compd. 2018;748:281–290.
238.
ZhangJLiWYanLA two-dimensional simulation of grain structure growth within the substrate and the fusion zone during direct metal deposition. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 2018;346:1072–1086.
239.
RolchigoMRLeSarR.Modeling of binary alloy solidification under conditions representative of additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;150:535–545.
240.
RolchigoMRLeSarR.Application of alloy solidification theory to cellular automata modeling of near-rapid constrained solidification. Comput Mater Sci. 2019;163:148–161.
241.
MukherjeeTWeiHLDeAHeat and fluid flow in additive manufacturing—part I: modeling of powder bed fusion. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;150:304–313.
242.
DongZLiuYWenW-BEffect of hatch spacing on melt pool and as-built quality during selective laser melting of stainless steel: modeling and experimental approaches. Materials (Basel). 2018;12:50.
243.
LindwallJPachecoVSahlbergMThermal simulation and phase modeling of bulk metallic glass in the powder bed fusion process. Additive Manufact. 2019;27:345–352.
244.
LindwallJMalmelövALundbäckAEfficiency and accuracy in thermal simulation of powder Bed fusion of bulk metallic glass. JOM. 2018;70:1598–1603.
245.
TaheriHKoesterLWBigelowTA Thermoelastic finite element modeling of laser generated ultrasound in additive manufacturing materials. ASNT Annual Conference 2017. p. 188–198.
246.
LiCGougeMFDenlingerEREstimation of part-to-powder heat losses as surface convection in laser powder bed fusion. Additive Manufact. 2019;26:258–269.
247.
ZengKPalDTengCEvaluations of effective thermal conductivity of support structures in selective laser melting. Additive Manufact. 2015;6:67–73.
248.
ForoozmehrABadrossamayMForoozmehrEFinite element simulation of selective laser melting process considering optical penetration depth of laser in powder bed. Mater Des. 2016;89:255–263.
249.
AndaniMTGhodratiMKaramooz-RavariMRDamage modeling of metallic alloys made by additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;743:656–664.
250.
BabuBLundbäckALindgrenL-E.Simulation of Ti-6Al-4V additive manufacturing using coupled physically based flow stress and metallurgical model. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:3844.
251.
AhmadiAShayesteh MoghaddamNElahiniaM Finite element modeling of selective laser melting 316l stainless steel parts for evaluating the mechanical properties. ASME 2016 11th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference 2016.
252.
YangCLZhangZJLiSJSimultaneous improvement in strength and plasticity of Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater Des. 2018;157:52–59.
253.
RankouhiBBertschKMMeric de BellefonGExperimental validation and microstructure characterization of topology optimized, additively manufactured SS316L components. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020;776:139050.
254.
TengCPalDGongHA review of defect modeling in laser material processing. Additive Manufact. 2017;14:137–147.
255.
MoranTPLiPWarnerDHUtility of superposition-based finite element approach for part-scale thermal simulation in additive manufacturing. Additive Manufact. 2018;21:215–219.
256.
HerriottCLiXKouraytemNA multi-scale, multi-physics modeling framework to predict spatial variation of properties in additive-manufactured metals. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2019;27:025009.
257.
WangZBeeseAM.Stress state-dependent mechanics of additively manufactured 304L stainless steel: part 2 – characterization and modeling of macroscopic plasticity behavior. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;743:824–831.
258.
YangLHarryssonOCormierDAdditive manufacturing of metal cellular structures: design and fabrication. JOM. 2015;67:608–615.
259.
SavioGRossoSMeneghelloRGeometric modeling of cellular materials for additive manufacturing in biomedical field: A review. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018;2018:1–14.
260.
BarrosRGouveiaRSabooriALaser powder Bed fusion of Inconel 718: residual stress analysis before and after heat treatment. Metals (Basel). 2019;9:1290.
261.
SinghSPBhardwajTShuklaM. Lattice modeling and finite element simulation for additive manufacturing of porous scaffolds. 2017 International Conference on Advances in Mechanical, Industrial, Automation and Management Systems (AMIAMS) 2017. p. 333–336.
262.
JahadakbarAShayesteh MoghaddamNAmerinatanziAFinite element simulation and additive manufacturing of stiffness-matched niti fixation hardware for mandibular reconstruction surgery. Bioengineering. 2016;3:36.
263.
HedayatiRHosseini-ToudeshkyHSadighiMComputational prediction of the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. Int J Fatigue. 2016;84:67–79.
264.
DallagoMZaniniFCarmignatoSEffect of the geometrical defectiveness on the mechanical properties of SLM biomedical Ti6Al4 V lattices. Procedia Struct Integrity. 2018;13:161–167.
265.
SuardMMartinGLhuissierPMechanical equivalent diameter of single struts for the stiffness prediction of lattice structures produced by electron beam melting. Additive Manufact. 2015;8:124–131.
266.
MaCLeiHLiangJMacroscopic mechanical response of chiral-type cylindrical metastructures under axial compression loading. Mater Des. 2018;158:198–212.
267.
KergaßnerAMergheimJSteinmannP.Modeling of additively manufactured materials using gradient-enhanced crystal plasticity. Comput Math Appl. 2019;78:2338–2350.
268.
TanPShenFLiBA thermo-metallurgical-mechanical model for selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V. Mater Des. 2019;168:107642.
269.
HedayatiRHosseini-ToudeshkyHSadighiMMultiscale modeling of fatigue crack propagation in additively manufactured porous biomaterials. Int J Fatigue. 2018;113:416–427.
270.
GhoshS.Predictive modeling of solidification during laser additive manufacturing of nickel superalloys: recent developments, future directions. Mater Res Express. 2018;5:012001.
271.
BrownNTMartinezEQuJ.Interfacial free energy and stiffness of aluminum during rapid solidification. Acta Mater. 2017;129:83–90.
272.
VoTQKimBH.Molecular dynamics study of thermodynamic properties of nanoclusters for additive manufacturing. Int J Precision Eng Manufact-Green Technol. 2017;4:301–306.
273.
SarkarSSarswatPKFreeML.Elevated temperature corrosion resistance of additive manufactured single phase AlCoFeNiTiV0.9Sm0.1 and AlCoFeNiV0.9Sm0.1 HEAs in a simulated syngas atmosphere. Additive Manufact. 2019;30:100902.
274.
TaylorCDLuPSaalJIntegrated computational materials engineering of corrosion resistant alloys. NPJ Mater Degrad. 2018;2:6.
275.
LiuWKChengPKafkaOL Linking process, structure, and property in additive manufacturing applications through advanced materials modelling. COMPLAS XIII: Proceedings of the XIII International Conference on Computational Plasticity: Fundamentals and Applications: CIMNE; 2015. p. 23–39.
276.
WangX. Microstructural and mechanical characterizations of metallic parts made by powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing technologies. The University of Alabama; 2017.
277.
PantawaneMVHoY-HJoshiSSComputational assessment of thermokinetics and associated microstructural evolution in laser powder bed fusion manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–14.
278.
InozemtsevASmetannıkovODubrovskaiaANumerical simulation in additive manufacturing of gas turbine parts. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2020;709:033042.
279.
MotamanSAHKiesFKöhnenPOptimal design for metal additive manufacturing: An integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) approach. JOM. 2020;72:1092–1104.
280.
NagarajanHPMokhtarianHJafarianHKnowledge-based design of artificial neural network topology for additive manufacturing process modeling: A new approach and case study for fused deposition modeling. J Mech Des. 2019;141:021705 (12 pages).
281.
SeifiMSalemABeuthJOverview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing. Jom. 2016;68:747–764.
282.
SinghSRamakrishnaSSinghR.Material issues in additive manufacturing: A review. J Manuf Process. 2017;25:185–200.
283.
BockFEAydinRCCyronCJA review of the application of machine learning and data mining approaches in Continuum materials mechanics. Front Materials. 2019;6:110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.00110
284.
XiongYDuongPLTWangDData-Driven design space Exploration and Exploitation for design for additive manufacturing. J Mech Des. 2019;141:101101 (12 pages). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043587
285.
AlpaydinE.Introduction to machine learning, fourth edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2020.
286.
MengLMcWilliamsBJarosinskiWMachine learning in additive manufacturing: A review. JOM. 2020;72:2363–2377.
287.
WuestTWeimerDIrgensCMachine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications. Prod Manuf Res. 2016;4:23–45.
288.
BaturynskaISemeniutaOMartinsenK.Optimization of process parameters for powder Bed fusion additive manufacturing by combination of machine learning and finite element method: A Conceptual framework. Procedia CIRP. 2018;67:227–232.
289.
ParviziSHafizpourHRSadrnezhaadSKNeural network prediction of mechanical properties of porous NiTi shape memory alloy. Powder Metall. 2011;54:450–454.
290.
ZhuZAnwerNHuangQMachine learning in tolerancing for additive manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 2018;67:157–160.
291.
WangZLiuPXiaoYA data-driven approach for process optimization of metallic additive manufacturing under uncertainty. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2019;141:081004 (14 pages). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043798
292.
RoyMWodoO.Data-driven modeling of thermal history in additive manufacturing. Additive Manufact. 2020;32:101017.
293.
EkinsSClarkAMDoleKData mining and computational modeling of high-throughput screening datasets. In: DamoiseauxRHassonS, editor. Reporter gene assays: methods and protocols. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2018. p. 197–221.
294.
Yusuf SMCutlerSGaoN.Review: The impact of metal additive manufacturing on the aerospace industry. Metals (Basel). 2019;9:1286.
295.
PaulAMozaffarMYangZ A real-time iterative machine learning approach for temperature profile prediction in additive manufacturing processes. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) 2019. p. 541–550.
296.
EvertonSKHirschMStravroulakisPReview of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2016;95:431–445.
297.
ShevchikSAKenelCLeinenbachCAcoustic emission for in situ quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using spectral convolutional neural networks. Additive Manufact. 2018;21:598–604.
298.
WasmerKLe-QuangTMeylanBIn situ quality monitoring in AM using acoustic emission: A Reinforcement learning approach. J Mater Eng Perform. 2019;28:666–672.
299.
ZhangYHongGSYeDExtraction and evaluation of melt pool, plume and spatter information for powder-bed fusion AM process monitoring. Mater Des. 2018;156:458–469.
300.
GanZLiHWolffSJData-Driven microstructure and microhardness design in additive manufacturing using a self-Organizing Map. Engineering. 2019;5:730–735.
301.
HuZWangHThoulessMDAn approach of adaptive effective cycles to couple fretting wear and creep in finite-element modeling. Int J Solids Struct. 2018: 139–140:302–311.
302.
KoishiMKowatariNFigliuzziB Computational material design of filled rubbers using multi-objective design exploration. 10th European Conference on Constitutive Models for Rubbers (ECCMR). Munich, Germany 2017.
303.
KhanzadehMChowdhurySMarufuzzamanMPorosity prediction: supervised-learning of thermal history for direct laser deposition. J Manuf Syst. 2018;47:69–82.
304.
LiZZhangZShiJPrediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2019;57:488–495.
305.
KhanzadehMRaoPJafari-MarandiRQuantifying geometric accuracy With unsupervised machine learning: using self-Organizing Map on fused Filament fabrication additive manufacturing parts. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2018;140:031011 (12 pages). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038598
