Metallic glasses (MGs) are arguably one of the most exciting metallic systems in the past 30 years, attracting significant research effort and undergoing rapid development. Parallel to research on crystalline metals, the sample size has been exploited as property-tuning parameters for MGs. It has been shown that nanometre-sized MG samples exhibit higher-than-bulk elastic limit, tensile strength, and non-zero tensile ductility. While some of the size-related observations have been generally accepted, others have been poorly understood, even hotly debated. Of particular interests is the importance of sample preparation in experiments and model generation in simulations. Here, we will review how the sample size affects mechanical properties including the elastic, plastic, fracture properties, and fatigue endurance, as well as various proposed size-dependent mechanisms and relevant length scales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JohnsonWL.Bulk glass-forming metallic alloys: science and technology. MRS Bull. 1999;24(10):42–56.
2.
InoueANishiyamaN.New bulk metallic glasses for applications as magnetic-sensing, chemical, and structural materials. MRS Bull. 2007;32(8):651–658.
3.
GreerA.Metallic glasses … on the threshold. Mater Today. 2009;12(1–2):14–22.
4.
WangWDongCShekC.Bulk metallic glasses. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2004;44(2–3):45–89.
5.
KlementWWillensRHDuwezP.Non-crystalline structure in solidified gold-silicon alloys. Nature. 1960;187(4740):869–870.
6.
PekerAJohnsonWL.A highly processable metallic-glass – Zr41.2ti13.8cu12.5ni10.0be22.5. Appl Phys Lett. 1993;63(17):2342–2344.
7.
InoueAGookJS.Fe-based ferromagnetic glassy alloys with wide supercooled liquid region. Mater Trans JIM. 1995;36(9):1180–1183.
8.
SuryanarayanaCInoueA.Iron-based bulk metallic glasses. Int Mater Rev. 2013;58(3):131–166.
9.
MaHXuJMaE.Mg-based bulk metallic glass composites with plasticity and high strength. Appl Phys Lett. 2003;83(14):2793–2795.
10.
InoueA.Amorphous, nanoquasicrystalline and nanocrystalline alloys in Al-based systems. Prog Mater Sci. 1998;43(5):365–520.
MiracleDB.A structural model for metallic glasses. Nat Mater. 2004;3(10):697–702.
13.
InoueAZhangTMasumotoT.ZR-AL-NI amorphous-alloys with high glass-transition temperature and significant supercooled liquid region. Mater Trans JIM. 1990;31(3):177–183.
14.
DingSLiuYLiYCombinatorial development of bulk metallic glasses. Nat Mater. 2014;13(5):494–500.
15.
TsaiPFloresKM.High-throughput discovery and characterization of multicomponent bulk metallic glass alloys. Acta Mater. 2016;120:426–434.
16.
ZhongLWangJShengHFormation of monatomic metallic glasses through ultrafast liquid quenching. Nature. 2014;512(7513):177–180.
17.
GuptaPK.Non-crystalline solids: glasses and amorphous solids. J Non Cryst Solids. 1996;195(1):158–164.
18.
KochCCCavinOBMcKameyCGPreparation of ‘amorphous’ Ni60Nb40 by mechanical alloying. Appl Phys Lett. 1983;43(11):1017–1019.
19.
El-EskandaranyMSSaidaJInoueA.Amorphization and crystallization behaviors of glassy Zr70Pd30 alloys prepared by different techniques. Acta Mater. 2002;50(10):2725–2736.
20.
NagaseTHosokawaTUmakoshiY.Solid state amorphization and crystallization in Zr66.7Pd33.3 metallic glass. Intermetallics. 2006;14(8):1027–1032.
LiuYLiuJSohnSMetallic glass nanostructures of tunable shape and composition. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7043.
23.
WangQYangYJiangHSuperior tensile ductility in bulk metallic glass with gradient amorphous structure. Sci Rep. 2014;4:srep04757.
24.
NiehTGYangYLuJEffect of surface modifications on shear banding and plasticity in metallic glasses: an overview. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int. 2012;22(5):355–363.
25.
PackardCEWitmerLMSchuhCA.Hardening of a metallic glass during cyclic loading in the elastic range. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92(17):171911.
26.
TongPLoucaDYokoyamaYInvestigating the effects of annealing on fatigue behavior in Zr-based bulk metallic glasses. MRS Proc. 2011;1300:u09-36.
27.
WadaTLouzguine-LuzginDVInoueA.Preparation of Zr-based metallic glass nanowires and nanoparticles by selective etching. Scr Mater. 2007;57(10):901–904.
28.
LanSRenYWeiXYHidden amorphous phase and reentrant supercooled liquid in Pd-Ni-P metallic glasses. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14679.
29.
BakkeEBuschRJohnsonWL.The viscosity of the Zr46.75Ti8.25Cu7.5Ni10Be27.5 bulk metallic glass forming alloy in the supercooled liquid. Appl Phys Lett. 1995;67(22):3260–3262.
30.
NiehTGWadsworthJLiuCTPlasticity and structural instability in a bulk metallic glass deformed in the supercooled liquid region. Acta Mater. 2001;49(15):2887–2896.
31.
EgamiTPoonSJZhangZGlass transition in metallic glasses: A microscopic model of topological fluctuations in the bonding network. Phys Rev B. 2007;76(2):024203.
32.
TaubAISpaepenF.The kinetics of structural relaxation of a metallic glass. Acta Metall. 1980;28(12):1781–1788.
33.
BuschRBakkeEJohnsonWL.Viscosity of the supercooled liquid and relaxation at the glass transition of the Zr46.75Ti8.25Cu7.5Ni10Be27.5 bulk metallic glass forming alloy. Acta Mater. 1998;46(13):4725–4732.
34.
SpaepenF.Microscopic mechanism for steady-state inhomogeneous flow in metallic glasses. Acta Metall. 1977;25(4):407–415.
35.
ArgonAS.Plastic-deformation in metallic glasses. Acta Metall. 1979;27(1):47–58.
36.
FalkMLLangerJS.Dynamics of viscoplastic deformation in amorphous solids. Phys Rev E. 1998;57(6):7192–7205.
37.
BuschRSchroersJWangWH.Thermodynamics and kinetics of bulk metallic glass. MRS Bull. 2007;32(8):620–623.
38.
LewandowskiJWangWGreerA.Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philos Mag Lett. 2005;85(2):77–87.
OakJ-JLouzguine-LuzginDVInoueA.Investigation of glass-forming ability, deformation and corrosion behavior of Ni-free Ti-based BMG alloys designed for application as dental implants. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29(1):322–327.
44.
ChuJPLiuT-YLiC-LFabrication and characterizations of thin film metallic glasses: antibacterial property and durability study for medical application. Thin Solid Films. 2014;561:102–107.
45.
AshbyMFGreerAL.Metallic glasses as structural materials. Scr Mater. 2006;54(3):321–326.
JohnsonWLSamwerK.A universal criterion for plastic yielding of metallic glasses with a (T/Tg)^(2/3) temperature dependence. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95(19):195501.
48.
GreerALChengYQMaE.Shear bands in metallic glasses. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2013;74(4):71–132.
49.
GuoHYanPFWangYBTensile ductility and necking of metallic glass. Nat Mater. 2007;6(10):735–739.
50.
HallEO.The deformation and ageing of mild steel .3. Discussion of results. Proc Phys Soc Lond B. 1951;64(381):747–753.
51.
ChokshiAHRosenAKarchJOn the validity of the hall-petch relationship in nanocrystalline materials. Scr Metall. 1989;23(10):1679–1683.
52.
KumarKVan SwygenhovenHSureshS.Mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals and alloys. Acta Mater. 2003;51(19):5743–5774.
53.
ShengHWLiuHZChengYQPolyamorphism in a metallic glass. Nat Mater. 2007;6(3):192–197.
54.
KazimirovVY.First-principles simulation of the elastic properties of multicomponent amorphous steels. Phys Rev B. 2009;80(21):214117.
55.
SrolovitzDVitekVEgamiT.An atomistic study of deformation of amorphous metals. Acta Metall Mater. 1983;31(2):335–352.
56.
FalkML.Molecular-dynamics study of ductile and brittle fracture in model noncrystalline solids. Physical Review B. 1999;60(10):7062–7070.
57.
MuraliPGuoTFZhangYWAtomic scale fluctuations govern brittle fracture and cavitation behavior in metallic glasses. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(21):215501.
58.
HomerERSchuhCA.Mesoscale modeling of amorphous metals by shear transformation zone dynamics. Acta Mater. 2009;57(9):2823–2833.
59.
FalkMLLangerJSPechenikL.Thermal effects in the shear-transformation-zone theory of amorphous plasticity: comparisons to metallic glass data. Phys Rev E. 2004;70(1):011507.
60.
TalamaliMPetäjäVVandembroucqDStrain localization and anisotropic correlations in a mesoscopic model of amorphous plasticity. C R Méc. 2012;340(4):275–288.
61.
GaoYF.An implicit finite element method for simulating inhomogeneous deformation and shear bands of amorphous alloys based on the free-volume model. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2006;14(8):1329.
62.
AnandLSuC.A theory for amorphous viscoplastic materials undergoing finite deformations, with application to metallic glasses. J Mech Phys Solids. 2005;53(6):1362–1396.
63.
RodneyDTanguyAVandembroucqD.Modeling the mechanics of amorphous solids at different length scale and time scale. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2011;19(8):083001.
64.
VolkertCADonohueASpaepenF.Effect of sample size on deformation in amorphous metals. J Appl Phys2008;103(8):083539–6.
65.
LuoJHWuFFHuangJYSuperelongation and atomic chain formation in nanosized metallic glass. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(21):215503.
66.
TianLChengY-QShanZ-WApproaching the ideal elastic limit of metallic glasses. Nat Commun. 2012;3:609.
67.
NakayamaKSYokoyamaYOnoTControlled formation and mechanical characterization of metallic glassy nanowires. Adv Mater. 2010;22(8):872–875.
68.
ChenDZJangDGuanKMNanometallic glasses: size reduction brings ductility, surface state drives its extent. Nano Lett. 2013;13(9):4462–4468.
69.
MagagnoscDJEhrbarRKumarGTunable tensile ductility in metallic glasses. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1096.
70.
ShiYF.Size-independent shear band formation in amorphous nanowires made from simulated casting. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;96(9):121909.
71.
SchroersJ.Processing of bulk metallic glass. Adv Mater. 2010;22(14):1566–1597.
72.
WuXLGuoYZWeiQPrevalence of shear banding in compression of Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 pillars as small as 150 nm in diameter. Acta Mater. 2009;57(12):3562–3571.
73.
JangDGreerJR.Transition from a strong-yet-brittle to a stronger-and-ductile state by size reduction of metallic glasses. Nat Mater. 2010;9(3):215–219.
74.
KumarGTangHXSchroersJ.Nanomoulding with amorphous metals. Nature. 2009;457(7231):868–872.
75.
LiuZSchroersJ.General nanomoulding with bulk metallic glasses. Nanotechnology. 2015;26(14):145301.
76.
MagagnoscDJChenWKumarGThermomechanical behavior of molded metallic glass nanowires. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19530.
77.
HasanMKumarG.High-throughput drawing and testing of metallic glass nanostructures. Nanoscale. 2017;9(9):3261–3268.
78.
XiaoQShengHWShiY.Dominant shear bands observed in amorphous ZrCuAl nanowires under simulated compression. MRS Commun. 2012;2(01):13–16.
79.
YuanFHuangL.Size-dependent elasticity of amorphous silica nanowire: a molecular dynamics study. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;103(20):201905.
80.
ShiYLuoJYuanFIntrinsic ductility of glassy solids. J Appl Phys. 2014;115(4):043528.
SinghSEdigerMDde PabloJJ.Ultrastable glasses from in silico vapour deposition. Nat Mater. 2013;12(2):139–144.
83.
ZhangQLiQ-KLiM.Processing dependence of mechanical properties of metallic glass nanowires. Appl Phys Lett. 2015;106(7):071905.
84.
ZhangQLiQ-KLiM.Chemical segregation in metallic glass nanowires. J Chem Phys. 2014;141(19):194701.
85.
LuanBQRobbinsMO.The breakdown of continuum models for mechanical contacts. Nature. 2005;435(7044):929–932.
86.
TanguyAWittmerJPLeonforteFContinuum limit of amorphous elastic bodies: a finite-size study of low-frequency harmonic vibrations. Phys Rev B. 2002;66(17):174205.
87.
MaloneyCELemaîtreA.Amorphous systems in athermal, quasistatic shear. Phys Rev E. 2006;74(1):016118.
88.
LeonforteFBoissièreRTanguyAContinuum limit of amorphous elastic bodies. III. Three-dimensional systems. Phys Rev B. 2005;72(22):224206.
89.
LeonforteFTanguyAWittmerJPContinuum limit of amorphous elastic bodies II: linear response to a point source force. Phys Rev B. 2004;70(1):014203.
90.
LuoWKShengHWAlamgirFMIcosahedral short-range order in amorphous alloys. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;92(14):145502.
91.
ShiYFFalkML.Atomic-scale simulations of strain localization in three-dimensional model amorphous solids. Phys Rev B. 2006;73(21):214201.
92.
FangXWWangCZYaoYXAtomistic cluster alignment method for local order mining in liquids and glasses. Phys Rev B. 2010;82(18):184204.
93.
MaloneyCE.Correlations in the elastic response of dense random packings. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;97(3):035503.
94.
VempatiUKValavalaPKFalkMLLength-scale dependence of elastic strain from scattering measurements in metallic glasses. Phys Rev B. 2012;85(21):214201.
95.
AbellGC.Empirical chemical pseudopotential theory of molecular and metallic bonding. Phys Rev B. 1985;31(10):6184–6196.
96.
LeishangthemPParmarADSSastryS.The yielding transition in amorphous solids under oscillatory shear deformation. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14653.
97.
ChengYQMaE.Intrinsic shear strength of metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2011;59(4):1800–1807.
98.
DengCSchuhCA.Atomistic mechanisms of cyclic hardening in metallic glass. Appl Phys Lett. 2012;100(25):251909.
99.
ShiYFFalkML.Simulations of nanoindentation in a thin amorphous metal film. Thin Solid Films. 2007;515(6):3179–3182.
100.
ShiYFFalkML.Stress-induced structural transformation and shear banding during simulated nanoindentation of a metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2007;55(13):4317–4324.
101.
YangYLuoJHuangLCrack initiation in metallic glasses under nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 2016;115:413–422.
102.
ShiYFKatzMBLiHEvaluation of the disorder temperature and free-volume formalisms via simulations of shear banding in amorphous solids. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98(18):185505.
103.
ShimizuFOgataSLiJ.Yield point of metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2006;54(16):4293–4298.
104.
PerepezkoJHImhoffSDChenM-WNucleation of shear bands in amorphous alloys. PNAS. 2014;111(11):3938–3942.
105.
OgataSShimizuFLiJAtomistic simulation of shear localization in Cu–Zr bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics. 2006;14(8–9):1033–1037.
106.
ChengYQHanZLiYCold versus hot shear banding in bulk metallic glass. Phys Rev B. 2009;80(13):134115.
107.
GreerJRDe HossonJTM.Plasticity in small-sized metallic systems: intrinsic versus extrinsic size effect. Prog Mater Sci. 2011;56(6):654–724.
108.
WangC-CDingJChengY-QSample size matters for Al88Fe7Gd5 metallic glass: smaller is stronger. Acta Mater. 2012;60(13–14):5370–5379.
109.
ShanZWLiJChengYQPlastic flow and failure resistance of metallic glass: insight from in situ compression of nanopillars. Phys Rev B. 2008;77(15):155419–6.
110.
SchusterBEWeiQHufnagelTCSize-independent strength and deformation mode in compression of a Pd-based metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2008;56(18):5091–5100.
111.
DubachARaghavanRLöfflerJFMicropillar compression studies on a bulk metallic glass in different structural states. Scr Mater. 2009;60(7):567–570.
112.
ChengYQCaoAJShengHWLocal order influences initiation of plastic flow in metallic glass: effects of alloy composition and sample cooling history. Acta Mater. 2008;56(18):5263–5275.
113.
ShiYFFalkML.Shear localization and percolation of stable structure in amorphous solids. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95:095502.
114.
ShiYFFalkML.Structural transformation and localization during simulated nanoindentation of a noncrystalline metal film. Appl Phys Lett. 2005;86:011914.
115.
ChengYQCaoAJMaE.Correlation between the elastic modulus and the intrinsic plastic behavior of metallic glasses: the roles of atomic configuration and alloy composition. Acta Mater. 2009;57(11):3253–3267.
116.
LiQKLiM.Assessing the critical sizes for shear band formation in metallic glasses from molecular dynamics simulation. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;91(23):231905–3.
117.
ZhangYWangWHGreerAL.Making metallic glasses plastic by control of residual stress. Nat Mater. 2006;5(11):857–860.
118.
XiaoQHuangLShiY.Suppression of shear banding in amorphous ZrCuAl nanopillars by irradiation. J Appl Phys. 2013;113(8):083514.
119.
TönniesDMaaßRVolkertCA.Room temperature homogeneous ductility of micrometer-sized metallic glass. Adv Mater. 2014;26(32):5715–5721.
120.
MagagnoscDJKumarGSchroersJEffect of ion irradiation on tensile ductility, strength and fictive temperature in metallic glass nanowires. Acta Mater. 2014;74:165–182.
121.
HanZWuWLiYAn instability index of shear band for plasticity in metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 2009;57(5):1367–1372.
122.
WuZZhangY-WJhonMHNanowire failure: long = brittle and short = ductile. Nano Lett. 2012;12(2):910–914.
123.
ŞopuDForoughiAStoicaMBrittle-to-ductile transition in metallic glass nanowires. Nano Lett. 2016;16(7):4467–4471.
124.
ShaZDHeLCXuSEffect of aspect ratio on the mechanical properties of metallic glasses. Scr Mater. 2014;93:36–39.
125.
LewandowskiJJGreerAL.Temperature rise at shear bands in metallic glasses. Nat Mater. 2006;5(1):15–18.
126.
LuoJShiY.Tensile fracture of metallic glasses via shear band cavitation. Acta Mater. 2015;82:483–490.
127.
GuanPLuSSpectorMJBCavitation in amorphous solids. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110(18):185502.
SureshS.Fatigue of materials. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
130.
LuoJDahmenKLiawPKLow-cycle fatigue of metallic glass nanowires. Acta Mater. 2015;87:225–232.
131.
ShaZDQuSXLiuZSCyclic deformation in metallic glasses. Nano Lett. 2015;15(10):7010–7015.
132.
WangC-CMaoY-WShanZ-WReal-time, high-resolution study of nanocrystallization and fatigue cracking in a cyclically strained metallic glass. PNAS. 2013;110(49):19725–19730.
133.
JangDMaaßRWangGFatigue deformation of microsized metallic glasses. Scr Mater. 2013;68(10):773–776.
134.
TaubAISpaepenF.Ideal elastic, anelastic and viscoelastic deformation of a metallic glass. J Mater Sci. 1981;16(11):3087–3092.
135.
SuzukiYEgamiT.Shear deformation of glassy metals: breakdown of Cauchy relationship and anelasticity. J Non Cryst Solids. 1985;75(1):361–366.
136.
DmowskiWIwashitaTChuangC-PElastic heterogeneity in metallic glasses. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105(20):205502.
137.
HarmonJSDemetriouMDJohnsonWLAnelastic to plastic transition in metallic glass-forming liquids. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;99(13):135502.
138.
JuJDJangDNwankpaAAn atomically quantized hierarchy of shear transformation zones in a metallic glass. J Appl Phys. 2011;109(5):053522.
139.
JuJDAtzmonM.A comprehensive atomistic analysis of the experimental dynamic-mechanical response of a metallic glass. Acta Mater. 2014;74(Supplement C):183–188.
140.
ChenNLouzguine-LuzginDVXieGQStructural investigation and mechanical properties of a representative of a new class of materials: nanograined metallic glasses. Nanotechnology. 2013;24(4):045610.
141.
SaracBSchroersJ.Designing tensile ductility in metallic glasses. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2158.
