Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Recovery Attitudes and Treatment Evaluator (RAATE), via 94 true/false questions, assesses resistance and obstacles to chemical dependence treatment. We computerized the RAATE to offer questions via digitized human voice and to recognize patient responses spoken into the computer's microphone. Sixty-eight consecutive adults seeking addictions treatment were randomized to one of four formats. The voice-input/voice-output version yielded the shortest mean duration of administration. Patients reported high satisfaction ratings and confidence that their answers were accurate. They perceived their responses to be useful in treatment planning. Group mean ratings did not significantly differ by version. There was a statistical trend in which the voice-based versions reduced the intragroup variability on test duration and patient confidence. Computerized voice-interactive interviewing may shorten test durations, increase the uniformity of administration, increase access for the vision-impaired, and increase the data entry efficiency and accuracy. The method provides a consistent, controlled, and nonjudgmental interview interaction.

Keywords

computer interview drug/alcohol dependence treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

M S

, Houston

T P

and Burson

J L

. Microcomputer-Based Health Education in the Waiting Room: A Feasibility Study, Columbus: Ohio State University.

Ellis

L BM

and Raines

J R

. 1981. Health education using microcomputers: Initial acceptability. Prev Med, 10: 77–84.

Fisher

L A

, Johnson

T S

, Porter

, Bleich

H L

and Slcak

W V

. 1977. Collection of a clean voided urine specimen: A comparison among spoken, written, and computer-based instructions. AJPH, 67(7): 640–644.

Ghosh

and Greist

J H

. 1988. Computer treatment in psychiatry. Psychiat Ann, 18: 246–250.

Servan-Schreiber

S D

. 1986. Artificial intelligence and psychiatry. J Nerv Ment Dis, 174(4): 191–202.

Lapham

S C

, Henley

and Kleyboecker

. 1993. Prenatal behavioral risk screening by computer among Native Americans. Fam Med, 25: 197–202.

Hasley

. 1995. A comparison of computer-based and personal interviews for the gynecologic history update. Obstet Gynecol, 85: 494–498.

Sanders

G D

, Owens

D K

, Padian

, Cardinalli

A B

, Sullivan

A N

and Nease

R F

. A computer-based interview to identify HIV risk behaviors and to assess patient preferences for HIV-related health states. Proceedings—the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. pp.20–24.

Locke

S E

, Kowaloff

H B

Hoff

R G

. 1992. Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission. JAMA, 268: 1301–1305.

10.

Carr

A C

and Ghosh

. 1983. Can a computer take a psychiatric history?. Psychol Med, 13: 151–158.

11.

Greist

J H

. 1984. “Conservative radicalism: An approach to computers in mental health”. In Using Computers in Clinical Practice, Edited by: Schwartz

M D

. New York: Haworth Press.

12.

Slack

W V

and Slack

C W

. 1977. Talking to a computer about emotional problems: A comparative study. Psychother Theory Res Pract, 14: 156–163.

13.

Duffy

J C

and Waterton

J J

. 1977. Under-reporting of alcohol consumption in sample surveys: The effect of computer interviewing in fieldwork. Br J Addict, 79: 303–308.

14.

Lucas

, Mullin

, Luna

and Meinroy

. 1977. Psychiatrists and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol-related illnesses: A comparison. Br J Psych, 131: 160–167.

15.

Ross

H E

, Swinson

, Doumani

and Larkin

E J

. 1995. Diagnosing comorbidity in substance abusers: A comparison of the test-retest reliability of two interviews. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse, 21: 167–185.

16.

Luehr

J G

, Davis

L J

Morse

R M

. 1991. Computer vs. interviewer screening for substance abuse, Rockville, MD: AMERSA National Conference.

17.

Butcher

J N

. 1994. Psychological assessment by computer: Potential gains and problems to avoid. Psychiat Ann, 24(1): 20–24.

18.

Brown

C S

, Wright

R G

and Christensen

D B

. 1987. Association between type of medication instruction and patients’ knowledge, side effects, and compliance. Hosp Comm Psychiatry, 38(1): 55–60.

19.

Mee-Lee

. The Recovery Attitude and Treatment Evaluator (RAATE): An instrument for patient progress and treatment assignment. Proc 34th Int Congr Alcohol Drug Depend. pp.424–426.

20.

Mee-Lee

. 1988. An instrument for treatment progress and matching: The Recovery Attitude and Treatment Evaluator (RAATE). J Substance Abuse Treat, 5: 183–186.

21.

McLellan

, Luborsky

and Woody

. 1980. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis, 168: 26–33.

22.

Smith

M B

, Hoffmann

N G

and Nederhoed

. 1995. The development and reliability of the Recovery Attitude and Treatment Evaluator—Questionnaire I (RAATE-QI). Int J Addict, 30: 147–160.

23.

American Society of Addiction Medicine. 1991. Patient Placement Criteria, Washington, DC: ASAM.

24.

Flowers

J V

, Booraem

C D

and Schwartz

. 1993. Impact of computerized rapid assessment instruments on counselors and client outcome. Computers Hum Serv, 10(2): 9–15.

A Voice-Based Computer Interview for Drug Dependence

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References