The Role of Executive Functioning Deficits in the Association between Substance-use-Related Stigma and Substance use Problems among Trauma-Exposed Individuals
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2022
The Role of Executive Functioning Deficits in the Association between Substance-use-Related Stigma and Substance use Problems among Trauma-Exposed Individuals
Background: Previous research has linked the internalization of shame and negative stereotypes associated with substance use to increased severity of substance use problems (i.e., negative consequences associated with alcohol and drug use, including occupational or relational difficulties and illegal behavior). However, little work has examined how other aspects of substance-use-related stigma (e.g., encounters with and anticipation of discrimination) might be related to the severity of substance use problems. Further, the psychological mechanisms through which stigma drives substance use problems remain poorly understood. Addressing these key limitations, the current study examined the role of executive functioning (EF) deficits in the relation between substance-use-related stigma and severity of substance use problems. Methods: In fall 2019, adults exposed to trauma who use substances were recruited via Amazon's Mechanical Turk (N = 320, 46.9% women) and completed self-report measures of substance-use-related stigma, EF deficits, and substance use problems. Results: Substance-use-related stigma was positively associated with EF deficits, which in turn related to substance use problems. Substance-use-related stigma was also indirectly associated with substance use problems through EF deficits, suggesting that EF deficits accounted for the significant association between substance-use-related stigma and substance use problems. Conclusions: These findings provide initial support for the role of EF deficits as a mechanism through which stigma drives substance use problems among individuals exposed to trauma. Results underscore the potential utility of addressing stigma coping and EF deficits in interventions aimed at preventing and treating substance use disorders.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the united states: Results from the 2018 national survey on drug use and health (hhs publications no, pep19-5068, nsduh series h-54). 2019. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/. Accessed March 18, 2020.
2.
LipariRN, Van HornSL. Trends in substance use disorders among adults aged 18 or older. The CBHSQ Report2017.
3.
PachankisJE, HatzenbuehlerML, WangKThe burden of stigma on health and well-being: a taxonomy of concealment, course, disruptiveness, aesthetics, origin, and peril across 93 stigmas. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018;44(4):451–474.
4.
KuleszaM, LarimerME, RaoD.Substance use related stigma: what we know and the way forward. J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2013;2(2):782.
5.
KuleszaM, RamseyS, BrownR, LarimerM.Stigma among individuals with substance use disorders: does it predict substance use, and does it diminish with treatment?J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. 2014;3(1):1000115.
6.
KuleszaM, WatkinsKE, OberAJ, OsillaKC, EwingB.Internalized stigma as an independent risk factor for substance use problems among primary care patients: rationale and preliminary support. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;180:52–55.
7.
DearingRL, StuewigJ, TangneyJP.On the importance of distinguishing shame from guilt: relations to problematic alcohol and drug use. Addict Behav. 2005;30(7):1392–1404.
8.
SmithLR, EarnshawVA, CopenhaverMM, CunninghamCO.Substance use stigma: reliability and validity of a theory-based scale for substance-using populations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;162:34–43.
9.
DebellF, FearNT, HeadMA systematic review of the comorbidity between ptsd and alcohol misuse. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49(9):1401–1425.
10.
BarkleyRA.Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (Bdefs for Adults). New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2011.
11.
InzlichtM, McKayL, AronsonJ.Stigma as ego depletion: how being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(3):262–269.
12.
BairAN, SteeleJR.Examining the consequences of exposure to racism for the executive functioning of black students. J Exper Soc Psychol. 2010;46(1):127–132.
13.
BlodornA, MajorB, HungerJ, MillerC.Unpacking the psychological weight of weight stigma: a rejection-expectation pathway. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2016;63:69–76.
14.
InzlichtM, KangSK.Stereotype threat spillover: how coping with threats to social identity affects aggression, eating, decision making, and attention. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;99(3):467–481.
15.
SalvatoreJ, SheltonJN.Cognitive costs of exposure to racial prejudice. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(9):810–815.
16.
ScheierLM, BotvinGJ, GriffinKW, DiazT.Latent growth models of drug refusal skills and adolescent alcohol use. J Alcohol Drug Educ. 1999;44(3):21.
17.
WillsTA, StoolmillerM.The role of self-control in early escalation of substance use: a time-varying analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(4):986–997.
18.
GolubSA, StarksTJ, KowalczykWJ, ThompsonLI, ParsonsJT.Profiles of executive functioning: associations with substance dependence and risky sexual behavior. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26(4):895–905.
19.
ParadaM, CorralM, MotaN, CregoA, HolguínSR, CadaveiraF.Executive functioning and alcohol binge drinking in university students. Addict Behav. 2012;37(2):167–172.
20.
GibbonsFX, O'HaraRE, StockML, GerrardM, WengC-Y, WillsTA.The erosive effects of racism: reduced self-control mediates the relation between perceived racial discrimination and substance use in african american adolescents. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012;102(5):1089–1104.
21.
PolakAR, WitteveenAB, ReitsmaJB, OlffM.The role of executive function in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;141(1):11–21.
22.
HortonJJ, ChiltonLB. The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Electronic commerce 2010.
23.
BuhrmesterM, KwangT, GoslingSD.Amazon's mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6(1):3–5.
24.
ShapiroDN, ChandlerJ, MuellerPA.Using mechanical turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science. 2013;1(2):213–220.
25.
PrinsA, BovinMJ, SmolenskiD The primary care PTSD screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): Development and evaluation within a veteran primary care sample. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(10):1206–1211.
26.
BarkleyRA, FischerM.Predicting impairment in major life activities and occupational functioning in hyperactive children as adults: self-reported executive function (ef) deficits versus ef tests. Dev Neuropsychol. 2011;36(2):137–161.
27.
BarkleyRA. The Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (DEFS): Assessing problems in executive functioning in daily life activities. New York, NY: Guilford; 2011.
28.
ShebleB.Validation of the Barkley Deficits of Executive Functioning-Short Form. Cambridge: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2019.
29.
SaundersJB, AaslandOG, BaborTF, de la FuenteJR, GrantM. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (audit): who collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804.
30.
BaborTF, Higgins-BiddleJC, SaundersJB, MonteiroMG.The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
31.
ShevlinM, SmithGW.The factor structure and concurrent validity of the alcohol use disorder identification test based on a nationally representative uk sample. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007;42(6):582–587.
32.
SkinnerHA.The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav. 1982;7(4):363–371.
HuL, BentlerPM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
35.
BentlerPM.Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238–246.
36.
SteigerJH.Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173–180.
37.
MacKinnonDP, LockwoodCM, HoffmanJM, WestSG, SheetsV.A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83–104.
38.
MeadeAW, CraigSB.Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(3):437–455.
CurranPJ, WestSG, FinchJF.The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):16–29.
41.
LuomaJB, KohlenbergBS, HayesSC, FletcherL.Slow and steady wins the race: a randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy targeting shame in substance use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80(1):43–53.
42.
PachankisJE, HatzenbuehlerML, RendinaHJ, SafrenSA, ParsonsJT.Lgb-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy for young adult gay and bisexual men: a randomized controlled trial of a transdiagnostic minority stress approach. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83(5):875–889.
