Self-Monitoring (SM), the act of observing ones’ own behavior, has been used in substance use treatment because SM may bring conscious awareness to automatized substance use behaviors. Empirical findings regarding SM's effectiveness are mixed. The aim of this study was to synthesize the literature for the efficacy of SM on substance use.
Method
A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed.
Results
Out of 2,659 citations, 41 studies with 126 analyses were included. Among analyses from studies rated Moderate (n = 24) or Strong (n = 3) quality, SM was shown to have a helpful effect (e.g., reducing substance use) 29% of the time; to have no effect 63.0% of the time; and to be detrimental in 8.0% of analyses. SM's helpful effects were associated with methodological characteristics including longer monitoring and Phone/IVR and EMA/Computer methodologies compared to Paper/Pencil. SM was more helpful in non-treatment-seekers (35.0% of analyses showed SM to be helpful compared to 25.0% of analyses with treatment-seekers).
Conclusions
Results of this study suggest that SM, under certain circumstances, as the potential to be a low-cost, low-risk research and early intervention strategy for substance users.
DiClementeCC, CornoCM, GraydonMM, WiprovnickAE, KnoblachDJ.Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: a review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(8):862–887.
2.
GatesPJ, SabioniP, CopelandJ, Foll GowingLB.Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(5):CD005336.
3.
PatnodeCD, HendersonJT, ThompsonJH, SengerCA, FortmannSP, WhitlockEP.Behavioral counseling and pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco cessation in adults, including pregnant women: a review of reviews for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(8):608–621.
4.
HeckmanBW, DahneJ, GermerothLJ, . Does cessation fatigue predict smoking-cessation milestones? A longitudinal study of current and former smokers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018;86(11):903–914.
5.
KenfordSL, SmithSS, WetterDW, JorenbyDE, FioreMC, BakerTB.Predicting relapse back to smoking: contrasting affective and physical models of dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(1):216–227.
6.
HendershotCS, WitkiewitzK, GeorgeWH, MarlattGA.Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors. Subst Abuse Treat Pr. 2011;6(1):17.
7.
MathewAR, Garrett-MayerE, HeckmanBW, WahlquistAE, CarpenterMJ.One-year smoking trajectories among established adult smokers with low baseline motivation to quit. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;20(1):50–57.
8.
MagillM, ApodacaTR, BorsariB, . A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process: technical, relational, and conditional process models of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018;86(2):140–157.
9.
Gleeson-KreigJM.Self-monitoring of physical activity: effects on self-efficacy and behavior in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2006;32(1):69–77.
10.
GronvallE, BerdezotoN.Beyond self-monitoring: understanding non-functional aspects of home-based healthcare technology. In: MatternF, SantiniS, eds. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2013:587–596.
11.
MyersS, GrantRW, LugnNE, HolbertB, KvedarJC.Inpact of home-based monitoring on the care of patients with congestive heart failure. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2006;18(6):444–451.
12.
RothbaumBO, MeadowsEA, ResickP, FoyDW.Cognitive-behavioral therapy. In: FoaEB, KeaneTM, FriedmanMJ, eds., Effective Treatments for PTSD: Practice Guidelines from the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2000:320–325.
13.
SimpsonTL, KivlahanDR, BushKR, McFallME.Telephone self-monitoring among alcohol use disorder patients in early recovery: a randomized study of feasibility and measurement reactivity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79(2):241–250.
14.
BernsteinJA, BernsteinE, HeerenTC. Mechanisms of change in control group drinking in clinical trials of brief alcohol intervention: implications for bias toward the null. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(5):498–507.
15.
KarolyP, KanferFH.Self-Management and Behavior Change: From Theory to Practice. Vol. 106. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1982.
16.
FazzinoTL, RoseGL, HelzerJE.An experimental test of assessment reactivity within a web-based brief alcohol intervention study for college students. Addict Behav. 2016;52:66–74.
17.
MeierE, MillerMB, LombardiN, LeffingwellT.Assessment reactivity: a randomized controlled trial of alcohol-specific measures on alcohol-related behaviors. Addict Behav. 2017;67:44–48.
18.
WordenBL, McCradyBS, EpsteinEE.Assessment reactivity to follow-up in a study of women's treatment for alcohol dependence. Addict Behav. 2008;33(6):831–835.
19.
KaminerY, BurlesonJA, BurkeRH.Can assessment reactivity predict treatment outcome among adolescents with alcohol and other substance use disorders?Subst Abus. 2008;29(2):63–69.
20.
MagillM, KahlerCW, MontiP, BarnettNP.Do research assessments make college students more reactive to alcohol events?Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26(2):338–344.
21.
MaistoSA, CliffordPR, DavisCM.Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: part II. Treatment engagement and involvement. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(4):529–533.
22.
OgborneAC, AnnisHM.The reactive effects of follow-up assessment procedures: an experimental study. Addict Behav. 1988;13(2):123–129.
23.
AbramsDB, WilsonGT.Self-monitoring and reactivity in the modification of cigarette smoking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1979;47(2):243–251.
24.
HelzerJE, BadgerGJ, RoseGL, MongeonJA, SearlesJS.Decline in alcohol consumption during two years of daily reporting. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63(5):551–558.
25.
McCarthyDE, PiaseckiTM, FioreMC, BakerTB.Life before and after quitting smoking: an electronic diary study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006;115(3):454–466.
26.
BurkeLE, WangJ, SevickMA.Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1):92–102.
27.
SafrenSA, OttoMW, WorthJL, . Two strategies to increase adherence to HIV antiretroviral medication: life-steps and medication monitoring. Behav Res Ther. 2001;39(10):1151–1162.
28.
van HeuckelumM, van den EndeCHM, HoutermanAEJ, HeemskerkCPM, van DulmenS, van den BemtBJF.The effect of electronic monitoring feedback on medication adherence and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185453.
29.
NorrisSL, EngelgauMM, NarayanKV.Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):561–587.
30.
NorrisSL, LauJ, SmithSJ, SchimidCH, EngelgauMM.Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(7):1159–1171.
TiffanyST.A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Rev. 1990;97(2):147–168.
33.
LeighBC, GillmoreMR, MorrisonDM.Comparison of diary and retrospective measures for recording alcohol consumption and sexual activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(2):119–127.
34.
GwaltneyCJ, BartolomeiR, ColbySM, KahlerCW.Ecological momentary assessment of adolescent smoking cessation: a feasibility study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(7):1185–1190.
35.
LegaultL.Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: Zeigler-HillV, ShackelfordTK, eds. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing AG; 2016:1–4.
36.
LocastroJS, PotterJS, DonovanDM, CouperD, PopeKW.Characteristics of first-time alcohol treatment seekers: the COMBINE study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69(6):885–895.
37.
MaasJ, HietbrinkL, RinckM, KeijsersGP.Changing automatic behavior through self-monitoring: does overt change also imply implicit change?J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013;44(3):279–284.
38.
RowanPJ, Cofta-WoerpelL, MazasCA, . Evaluating reactivity to ecological momentary assessment during smoking cessation. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;15(4):382–389.
39.
Effective Public Health Practice Project. 1998. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Hamilton, ON: Effective Public Health Practice Project. Available from: https://merst.ca/ephpp/.
40.
MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, AltmanDG.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
41.
LiberatiA, AltmanDG, TetzlaffJ, . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS. 2009;339:b2700.
42.
BewickBM, WestRM, BarkhamM, . The effectiveness of a web-based personalized feedback and social norms alcohol intervention on united kingdom university students: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e137.
43.
HarrisKB, MillerWR.Behavioral self-control training for problem drinkers: components of efficacy. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1990;4(2):82–90.
44.
HasinDS, AharonovichE, O'LearyA, . Reducing heavy drinking in HIV primary care: a randomized trial of brief intervention, with and without technological enhancement. Addiction. 2013;108(7):1230–1240.
45.
HelzerJE, RoseGL, BadgerGJ, . Using interactive voice response to enhance brief alcohol intervention in primary care settings. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69(2):251–258.
46.
HuffordMR, ShieldsAL, ShiffmanS, PatyJ, BalabanisM.Reactivity to ecological momentary assessment: an example using undergraduate problem drinkers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2002;16(3):205–211.
47.
JohnsonEI, GrondinO, BarraultM, . Computerized ambulatory monitoring in psychiatry: a multi-site collaborative study of acceptability, compliance, and reactivity. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009;18(1):48–57.
48.
KennedyRW, GilbertGS, ThoresonR.A self-control program for drinking antecedents: the role of self-monitoring and control orientation. J Clin Psychol. 1978;34(1):238–243.
49.
RosenbergH.Coping strategies, reasons for driving, and the effect of self-monitoring in drinking-driving situations. Addict Behav. 1988;13(1):97–100.
50.
SamoJA, TuckerJA, VuchinichRE.Agreement between self-monitoring, recall, and collateral observation measures of alcohol consumption in older adults. Behavioral Assessment. 1989;11(4):391–409.
SuffolettoB, KristanJ, ChungT, . An interactive text message intervention to reduce binge drinking in young adults: a randomized controlled trial with 9-month outcomes. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142877.
53.
SugarmanDE, CareyKB.Drink less or drink slower: the effects of instruction on alcohol consumption and drinking control strategy use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23(4):577–585.
54.
TuckerJA, RothDL, HuangJ, CrawfordMS, SimpsonCA.Effects of interactive voice response self-monitoring on natural resolution of drinking problems: utilization and behavioral economic factors. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(4):686–698.
55.
WaltersST, VaderAM, HarrisTR, JourilesEN.Reactivity to alcohol assessment measures: an experimental test. Addiction. 2009;104(8):1305–1310.
56.
FrederiksenLW, EpsteinLH, KosevskyBP.Reliability and controlling effects of three procedures for self-monitoring smoking. Psychol Rec. 1975;25(2):255–264.
57.
KarolyP, DoyleWW.Effects of outcome expectancy and timing of self-monitoring on cigarette smoking. J Clin Psychol. 1975;31(2):351–355.
58.
KilmannPR, WagnerMK, SotileWM.The differential impact of self-monitoring on smoking behavior: an exploratory study. J Clin Psychol. 1977;33(3):912–914.
59.
LamontagneY, AnnableL, GagnonMA.Acupuncture for smokers: lack of long-term therapeutic effect in a controlled study. Can Med Assoc J. 1980;122(7):787–790.
60.
LipinskiD, BlackJL, NelsonRO, CimineroAR.Influence of motivational variables on the reactivity and reliability of self-recording. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975;43(5):637–646.
61.
MagnanRE, KoblitzAR, McCaulKD, DillardAJ.Self-monitoring effects of ecological momentary assessment on smokers’ perceived risk and worry. Psychol Assess. 2013;25(2):416–423.
62.
McCarthyDE, MinamiH, YehVM, BoldKW.An experimental investigation of reactivity to ecological momentary assessment frequency among adults trying to quit smoking. Addiction. 2015;110(10):1549–1560.
63.
McFallRM.Effects of self-monitoring on normal smoking behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1970;35(2):135–142.
64.
MossRA, PrueDM, LomaxD, MartinJE.Implications of self-monitoring for smoking treatment: effects on adherence and session attendance. Addict Behav. 1982;7(4):381–385.
65.
SchmitzJM, GrabowskiJ, RhoadesH.The effects of high and low doses of methadone on cigarette smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1994;34(3):237–242.
66.
ShiffmanS, EngbergJB, PatyJA, . A day at a time: predicting smoking lapse from daily urge. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106(1):104–116.
67.
WrayJM, GassJC, MillerEI, WilkinsDG, RollinsDE, TiffanyST.A comparative evaluation of self-report and biological measures of cigarette use in nondaily smokers. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(9):1043–1050.
68.
AharonovichE, HatzenbuehlerML, JohnstonB, . A low-cost, sustainable intervention for drinking reduction in the HIV primary care setting. AIDS Care. 2006;18(6):561–568.
69.
AharonovichE, SarvetA, StohlM, . Reducing non-injection drug use in HIV primary care: a randomized trial of brief motivational interviewing, with and without HealthCall, a technology-based enhancement. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;74:71–79.
70.
FreedmanMJ, LesterKM, McNamaraC, MilbyJB, SchumacherJE.Cell phones for ecological momentary assessment with cocaine-addicted homeless patients in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30(2):105–111.
71.
MooreTM, SeaveyA, RitterK, McNultyJK, GordonKC, StuartGL.Ecological momentary assessment of the effects of craving and affect on risk for relapse during substance abuse treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(2):619–624.
72.
RebackCJ, RungerD, FletcherJB, SwendemanD.Ecological momentary assessments for self-monitoring and counseling to optimize methamphetamine treatment and sexual risk reduction outcomes among gay and bisexual men. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;92:17–26.
73.
TuckerJA, BlumER, XieL, RothDL, SimpsonCA.Interactive voice response self-monitoring to assess risk behaviors in rural substance users living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(2):432–440.
74.
SchwarzerR.Modeling health behaviour change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(1):1–29.
75.
AharonovichE, StohlM, CannizzaroD, HasinD.HealthCall delivered via smartphone to reduce co-occurring drug and alcohol use in HIV-infected adults: a randomized pilot trial. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;83:15–26.
76.
BuuA, YangS, LiR, ZimmermanMA, CunninghamRM, WaltonMA.Examining measurement reactivity in daily diary data on substance use: results from a randomized experiment. Addict Behav. 2020;102:106198.
77.
WelschSK, SmithSS, WetterDW, JorenbyDE, FioreMC, BakerTB.Development and validation of the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999;7(4):354–361.
78.
WatsonD, ClarkLA, TellegenA.Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychl. 1988;54(6):1063–1070.
79.
CondiotteMM, LichtensteinE.Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation programs. J Consult Clin Psych. 1981;49(5):648–658.
80.
WardRM, VelicerWF, RossiJS, FavaJL, ProchaskaJO. Factorial invariance and internal consistency for the Decisional Balance Inventory-Short Form. Addict Behav. 2004;29(5):953–958.
81.
VelicerWF, DiclementeCC, RossiJS, ProchaskaJO.Relapse situations and self-efficacy: an integrative model. Addict Behav. 1990;15(3):271–283.
SaundersJB, AaslandOG, BaborTF, de la FuenteJR, GrantM. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804.
84.
BushK, KivlahanDR, McDonellMB, FihnSD, BradleyKA.The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory care quality improvement project (ACQUIP). Alcohol use disorders identification test. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789–1795.
85.
EisenhauerCM, HagemanPA, RowlandS, BeckerBJ, BarnasonSA, PullenCH. Acceptability of mHealth technology for self-monitoring eating and activity among rural men. Public Health Nurs. 2017;34(2):138–146.
86.
ProchaskaJO, VelicerWF.The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48.
87.
HelselDL, JakicicJM, OttoAD.Comparison of techniques for self-monitring eating and exercse behaviors on weight loss in a correspondance-based intervention. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007;107(10):1807–1810.
88.
MillerWR, RoseGS.Motivational interviewing and decisional balance: contrasting responses to client ambivalence. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2015;43(2):129–141.
89.
KanejimaY, KitamuraM, IzawaKP.Self-monitoring to increase physical activity in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(2):163–173.
90.
PainterSL, AhmedR, HillJO, . What matters in weight loss? An in-depth analysis of self-monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e160.
91.
TuckerKL, SheppardJP, StevensR, . Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14(9):e1002389.
92.
GreenwaldAG.Within-subjects designs: to use or not to use?Psych Bull. 1976;83(2):314–320.
