Women with alcohol disorders have more severe problems related to their drinking than men. They have higher mortality from alcohol-related accidents and enter treatment with more serious medical, psychiatric, and social consequences.
Objective
This study assessed the effects of Intensive Motivational Interviewing (IMI), a new, 9-session counseling intervention for women with drinking problems.
Methods
A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 215 women. Most were white (83%), college educated (61%), and older (mean age 51). Half received IMI and half a standard single session of MI (SMI) along with an attention control (nutritional education).
Results
Generalized estimating equations models showed women who were heavy drinkers at baseline in the IMI condition reduced heavy drinking more than those in the SMI condition at 2-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Analyses of disaggregated subgroups showed IMI was most effective for women with low psychiatric severity, more severe physical and impulse control consequences associated with drinking, and higher motivation. However, formal 3-way interaction models (condition by moderator by time) showed significant effects primarily at 2 months.
Conclusions
Improvements associated with IMI were limited to heavy drinking and varied among subgroups of women. Studies of women with more diverse characteristics are needed.
ErolA, KarpyakVM.Sex and gender-related differences in alcohol use and its consequences: contemporary knowledge and future research considerations. Drug Alcohol Depend.2015;156:1–13.
2.
GreenfieldSF, BrooksAJ, GordonSMSubstance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Depend.2007;86(1):1–21.
3.
McHughRK, WigdersonS, GreenfieldSF.Epidemiology of substance use in reproductive-age women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am.2014;41(2):177–189.
4.
TarasoffLA, MilliganK, LeTL, UsherAM, UrbanoskiK.Integrated treatment programs for pregnant and parenting women with problematic substance use: service descriptions and client perceptions of care. J Subst Abuse Treat.2018;90:9–18.
5.
WalitzerKS, DearingRL.Gender differences in alcohol and substance use relapse. Clin Psychol Rev.2006;26(2):128–148.
6.
TuchmanE.Women and addiction: the importance of gender issues in substance abuse research. J Addict Dis.2010;29(2):127–138.
7.
GrantS, PedersenER, OsillaKC, KuleszaM, D'AmicoEJ.Reviewing and interpreting the effects of brief alcohol interventions: comment on a Cochrane review about motivational interviewing for young adults. Addiction2016;111(9):1521–1527.
8.
CarrollKM, BallSA, NichCMotivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: a multisite effectiveness study. Drug Alcohol Depend.2006;81(3):301–312.
9.
CollaborativeA.The impact of screening, brief intervention and referral for treatment in emergency department patients’ alcohol use: a 3-, 6-and 12-month follow-up. Alcohol Alcohol2010;45(6):514–519.
10.
PolcinDL, KorchaR, NayakM.Development of intensive motivational interviewing (IMI) and modifications for treating women with alcohol use disorders. J Contemp Psychother.2018;48(2):51–59.
11.
PolcinDL, KorchaR, PughSIntensive motivational interviewing for heavy drinking among women. Addict Disord Their Treat.2019;18(2):70–80.
12.
PolcinDL, NayakMB, KorchaRHeavy drinking among women receiving intensive motivational interviewing: 6-month outcomes. J Psychoactive Drugs.2019;51:1–10.
13.
GallowayGP, PolcinD, KielsteinA, BrownM, MendelsonJ.A nine session manual of motivational enhancement therapy for methamphetamine dependence: adherence and efficacy. J Psychoactive Drugs.2007;39(sup4):393–400.
14.
PolcinDL, GallowayGP, PalmerJ, MainsW.The case for high-dose motivational enhancement therapy. Subst Use Misuse.2004;39(2):331–343.
15.
PolcinDL, KorchaR, WitbrodtJ, MericleAA, MahoneyE.Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) for persons on probation or parole entering sober living houses. Crim Justice Behav.2018;45(11):1634–1659.
16.
ObertJL, FarentinosC.Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) to Improve Treatment Engagement and Outcome in Subject Seeking Treatment for Substance Abuse. Washington, DC: Clinical Trials Network, NIDA; 2000.
17.
MillerWR, RollnickS.Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2012.
18.
PolcinDL, BondJ, KorchaR, NayakMB, GallowayGP, EvansK.Randomized trial of intensive motivational interviewing for methamphetamine dependence. J Addict Dis.2014;33(3):253–265.
19.
KorchaRA, PolcinDL, EvansK, BondJC, GallowayGP.Intensive motivational interviewing for women with concurrent alcohol problems and methamphetamine dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat.2014;46(2):113–119.
20.
WitbrodtJ, PolcinD, KorchaR, LiL.Beneficial effects of motivational interviewing case management: a latent class analysis of recovery capital among sober living residents with criminal justice involvement. Drug Alcohol Depend.2019;200:124–132.
21.
DeYoungPA.Relational Psychotherapy: A Primer. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2015.
22.
MillerWR, ToniganJS, LongabaughR. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): an instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Volume 4 (NIH Pub. No. 95-3911). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health; 1995. Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6Wl5CLTWX. Accessed March 03, 2015.
23.
NuroKF, MaccarelliL, MartinoSYale Adherence and Competence Scale (YACSII) Guidelines. West Haven, CT: Yale University Psychotherapy Development Center; 2005.
24.
GallowayGP, Marinelli-CaseyP, StalcupJTreatment-as-usual in the methamphetamine treatment project. J Psychoactive Drugs.2000;32(2):165–175.
25.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2000.
26.
FormanRF, SvikisD, MontoyaID, BlaineJ.Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat.2004;27(1):1–8.
27.
SobellLC, SobellMB, BuchanG, ClelandPA, FedoroffIC, LeoGI.The Reliability of the Timeline Followback Method Applied to Drug, Cigarette, and Cannabis Use. New York, NY: Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy; 1996.
28.
McLellanAT, LuborskyL, WoodyGE, O'BrienCP.An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: the Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis.1980;168(1):26–33.
29.
MäkeläK.Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index. Addiction.2004;99(4):398–410.
30.
WilloughbyFW, EdensJF.Construct validity and predictive utility of the stages of change scale for alcoholics. J. Subst Abuse.1996;8(3):275–291.
31.
McLellanAT, McKayJR, FormanR, CacciolaJS, KempJ.Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: from retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction.2005;100(4):447–458.
32.
AdamsonSJ, SellmanJD, FramptonC.Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat.2009;36(1):75–86.
33.
RitsherJB, McKellarJD, FinneyJW, OtilingamPG, MoosRH.Psychiatric comorbidity, continuing care and mutual help as predictors of five-year remission from substance use disorders. J Stud Alcohol.2002;63(6):709–715.
34.
PolcinDL, KorchaRA, KerrWC, GreenfieldTK, BondJ.Gender and social pressure to change drinking behavior: results from the National Alcohol Surveys from 1984-2010. Addict Res Theory.2014;22(6):481–489.
