A Mobile App to Promote Alcohol and Drug SBIRT Skill Translation among Multi-Disciplinary Health Care Trainees: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2022
A Mobile App to Promote Alcohol and Drug SBIRT Skill Translation among Multi-Disciplinary Health Care Trainees: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for alcohol and drug screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is often inadequate. Mobile apps developed as clinical translation tools could improve the delivery of high fidelity SBIRT.
Methods
This study tested the effectiveness of an SBIRT mobile app conceptually aligned with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to support SBIRT delivery by health care trainees (nursing, social work, internal medicine, psychiatry, and psychology) working in clinical settings (N = 101). Bivariate analyses examined the rate of SBIRT delivery between trainees assigned to the experimental (app) and control (no app) study conditions; as well as the relationship between TPB-based constructs, intention to deliver SBIRT, and screening rates.
Results
No significant differences were identified between the study conditions in SBIRT delivery. Significant correlations were found between intent to screen and TPB variables including attitudes/behavioral beliefs concerning substance use treatment (r = .49, p = .01); confidence in clinical skills (r = .36, p = .01); subjective norms (r = .54, p = .01) and perceived behavioral control over appointment time constraints (r = .42, p = .01). Also significant were correlations between percent of patients screened and confidence (r = .24, p = .05); subjective norms (r = .22, p = .05) and perceived behavioral control (r = .28, p = .01).
Conclusions
The negative results of the study condition comparisons indicate the need for further investigation of strategies to optimize mobile app utilization, engagement, and effectiveness as a clinical translation tool. Findings of significant correlations between substance use screening rates and both norms and confidence support the potential value of the TPB model in explaining behavior of health care learners in SBIRT delivery.
BaborTF, McReeBG, KassebaumPA, GrimaldiPL, AhmedK, BrayJ.screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Subst Abus.2007;28(3):7–30.
3.
BrayJW, Del BocaFK, McReeBG, HayashiSW, BaborTF.Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): rationale, program overview and cross-site evaluation. Addiction2017;112(Suppl 2):3–11.
4.
AgleyJ, McNelisAM, CarlsonJM.If you teach it, they will screen: advanced practice nursing students’ use of screening and brief intervention in the clinical setting. J Nurs Educ.2016;55(4):231–235.
5.
MaloneGP, Vale ArismendezS, Schneegans WarzinskiSSouth Texas Residency screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) training: 12-month outcomes. Subst Abus.2015;36(3):272–280.
6.
AbidiL, OenemaA, NilsenP, AndersonP, van de MheenD.Strategies to overcome barriers to implementation of alcohol screening and brief intervention in general practice: a Delphi study among healthcare professionals and addiction prevention experts. Prev Sci.2016;17(6):689–699.
7.
WeisnerC, SatreDD.A key challenge for motivational interviewing: training in clinical practice. Addiction2016;111(7):1154–1156.
8.
BradleyKA, LaphamGT, HawkinsEJQuality concerns with routine alcohol screening in VA clinical settings. J Gen Intern Med.2011;26(3):299–306.
9.
GarnickDW, HorganCM, MerrickEL, HoytA.Identification and treatment of mental and substance use conditions: health plans strategies. Med Care.2007;45(11):1060–1067.
10.
HallK, StaigerPK, SimpsonA, BestD, LubmanDI.After 30 years of dissemination, have we achieved sustained practice change in motivational interviewing?Addiction2016;111(7):1144–1150.
11.
SatreDD, LeibowitzAS, MertensJR, WeisnerC.Advising depression patients to reduce alcohol and drug use: factors associated with provider intervention in outpatient psychiatry. Am J Addict.2014;23(6):570–575.
12.
van BeurdenI, AndersonP, AkkermansRP, GrolRP, WensingM, LaurantMG.Involvement of general practitioners in managing alcohol problems: a randomized controlled trial of a tailored improvement programme. Addiction2012;107(9):1601–1611.
13.
WilliamsEC, JohnsonML, LaphamGTStrategies to implement alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care settings: a structured literature review. Psychol Addict Behav.2011;25(2):206–214.
14.
HodgsonJ, StantonM, AthertonWImplementation of SBIRT: Focus group analysis of provider teams in academic and community healthcare settings. J Rehabil Med.2016;82:48–59.
15.
RahmAK, BoggsJM, MartinCFacilitators and barriers to implementing screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) in primary care in integrated health care settings. Subst Abus.2015;36(3):281–288.
16.
YoastRA, WilfordBB, HayashiSW.Encouraging physicians to screen for and intervene in substance use disorders: obstacles and strategies for change. J Addict Dis.2008;27(3):77–97.
17.
SatreDD, McCance-KatzEF, Moreno-JohnG, JulianKA, O'SullivanPS, SatterfieldJM.Using needs assessment to develop curricula for screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) in academic and community health settings. Substance Abuse.2012;33(3):298–302.
18.
WamsleyM, SatterfieldJM, CurtisA, LundgrenL, SatreDD.Alcohol and drug screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) training and implementation: perspectives from 4 health professions. J Addict Med.2018;12(4):262–272.
19.
Webster-StrattonCH, ReidMJ, MarsenichL.Improving therapist fidelity during implementation of evidence-based practices: incredible years program. Psychiatr Serv.2014;65(6):789–795.
20.
ClayCA.Exploring the use of mobile technologies for the acquisition of clinical skills. Nurse Educ Today.2011;31(6):582–586.
21.
LamarcheK, ParkC, FraserS, RichM, MacKenzieS.In the palm of your hand - normalizing the use of mobile technology for nurse practitioner education and clinical practice. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2016;29(3):120–132.
22.
RamanJ.Mobile technology in nursing education: where do we go from here? A review of the literature. Nurse Educ Today.2015;35(5):663–672.
23.
HiltyDM, ChanS, TorousJ, LuoJ, BolandRJ.Mobile health, smartphone/device, and apps for psychiatry and medicine: competencies, training, and faculty development issues. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2019;42(3):513–534.
24.
RileyWT, RiveraDE, AtienzaAA, NilsenW, AllisonSM, MermelsteinR.Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?Behav Med Pract Policy Res.2011;1(1):53–71.
25.
LowD, ClarkN, SoarJA randomised control trial to determine if use of the iResus(c) application on a smart phone improves the performance of an advanced life support provider in a simulated medical emergency. Anaesthesia.2011;66(4):255–262.
26.
MartinezF, TobarC, TaramascoC.Implementation of a smartphone application in medical education: a randomised trial (iSTART). BMC Med Educ.2017;17(1):168.
27.
ShortSS, LinAC, MerianosDJ, BurkeRV, UppermanJS.Smartphones, trainees, and mobile education: implications for graduate medical education. J Grad Med Educ.2014;6(2):199–202.
28.
AjzenI.The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process.1991;50(2):179–211.
29.
CurtisAC, SatreDD, LyK, WamsleyM, SatterfieldJ.Implementation of alcohol and drug screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment: nurse practitioner learner perspectives on a mobile app. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract.2019;31(4):219–225.
30.
SatreDD, LyK, WamsleyM, CurtisA, SatterfieldJ.A digital tool to promote alcohol and drug use screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment skill translation: a mobile app development and randomized controlled trial protocol. JMIR Res Protoc.2017;6(4):e55.
SAS Institute Inc. Sas. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2011.
33.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Austria. https://www.r-project.org
34.
LinJ, FaustB, EbertDD, KramerL, BaumeisterH.A web-based acceptance-facilitating intervention for identifying patients’ acceptance, uptake, and adherence of internet- and mobile-based pain interventions: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res.2018;20(8):e244.
35.
MichieS, YardleyL, WestR, PatrickK, GreavesF.Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: Recommendations resulting from an international workshop. J Med Internet Res.2017;19(6):e232.
36.
RathboneAL, PrescottJ.The use of mobile apps and SMS Messaging as physical and mental health interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res.2017;19(8):e295.
37.
YardleyL, SpringBJ, RiperHUnderstanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med.2016;51(5):833–842.
38.
PerskiO, BlandfordA, WestR, MichieS.Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Behav Med Pract Policy Res.2017;7(2):254–267.
39.
Knopf-AmelungS, GothamH, KuofieA.Consider the setting: challenges in integrating screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment into nursing and social work students’ clinical practice. J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil.2017;6(1). doi: 10.4172/2324-9005.1000160
40.
LycettHJ, RaebelEM, WildmanEKTheory-based digital interventions to improve asthma self-management outcomes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res.2018;20(12):e293.
41.
SucalaM, EzeanochieNP, Cole-LewisH, TurgissJ.An iterative, interdisciplinary, collaborative framework for developing and evaluating digital behavior change interventions. Transl Behav Med2019. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibz109
42.
SatterfieldJM. “Raising the bar” for educational science. Ann Behav Sci Med Educ.2013;19(2):8–9.
