Despite a growing interest in persons with multiple treatment reentries, few studies have defined their clinical profile. The aim of this study was to compare the severity profile of substance use disorder and related problems of persons who reenter treatment with the profile of those who come in for treatment for the first time.
Methods
A data bank containing 6651 Addiction Severity Index (ASI) interviews from 3 rehabilitation centers was used for the analyses.
Results
All the ASI composite scores were significantly higher among persons who reentered treatment than among those who came for the first time.
Conclusion
The results support the hypothesis of a more severe ASI profile and substance use–related problems among persons who reenter treatment compared with those who come for the first time. Consequently, they have greater needs, and the treatment offered should be adjusted accordingly.
FleuryMJ, DjouaniA, HuynhC, . Remission from substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;168:293–306. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.625
2.
GrellaCE, SteinJA. Remission from substance dependence: differences between individuals in a general population longitudinal survey who do and do not seek help. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;133:146–153.
3.
MoosRH, MoosBS. Rates and predictors of relapse after natural and treated remission from alcohol use disorders. Addiction. 2006;101:212–222.
4.
ScottC. K, FossMA, DennisML. Pathways in the relapse-treatment-recovery cycle over 3 years. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005;28(Suppl 1):S63–S72.
5.
BravoF, GualA, LligoñaA, ColomJ. Gender differences in the long-term outcome of alcohol dependence treatments: an analysis of twenty-year prospective follow up. Drug Alcohol Rev.2013;32:381–388.
6.
DennisM. L, FossMA, ScottCK. An eight-year perspective on the relationship between the duration of abstinence and other aspects of recovery. Eval Rev.2007;31:585–612.
7.
Flórez-SalamancaL, Secades-VillaR, BudneyAJ, García-RodríguezO, WangS, BlancoC. Probability and predictors of cannabis use disorders relapse: results of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132:127–133.
8.
HserYI, AnglinMD. Addiction treatment and recovery careers. In: KellyJF, WhiteWL, eds. Addiction Recovery Management: Theory, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media; 2011:9–29.
DennisM. L, ScottCK, FunkR, FossMA. The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005;28(Suppl 1):S51–S62.
11.
McKayJ. R. Continuing care in the treatment of addictive disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep.2006;8:355–362.
12.
McLellanA. T, LewisDC, O'BrienCP, KleberHD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 2000;284:1689–1695.
13.
ScottC. K, DennisML. Results from two randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of quarterly recovery management checkups with adult chronic substance users. Addiction. 2009;104:959–971.
14.
CacciolaJS, Leggett DugoshK, CamilleriAC. Treatment history: relationship to treatment outcomes. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44:305–321.
15.
López-GoñiJJ, Fernandez-MontalvoJ, CachoR, ArteagaA. Profile of addicted patients who reenter treatment programs. Subst Abus.2014;35:176–183.
16.
van DraanenJ, CorneauS, HendersonT, QuastelA, GrillerR, StergiopoulosV. Reducing service and substance use among frequent service users: a brief report from the Toronto Community Addictions Team. Subst Use Misuse. In press;48:532–538.
17.
GrahnR, ChasslerD, LundgrenL. Repeated addiction treatment use in Sweden: a national register database study. Subst Use Misuse. 2014;49:1764–1773. Accessed May 2017.
18.
SimoneauH, MénardJM, Blanchette-MartinN. Addiction severity and suicidal behaviors among persons entering treatment. Arch Suicide Res.2017;21:341–353.
19.
BergeronJ, LandryM, IshakA, VaugeoisP, TrépanierM. Validation d'un instrument d'évaluation de la gravité des problèmes reliés à la consommation de drogues et alcool: l'Indice de gravité d'une toxicomanie (ASI/IGT). Québec, Canada: Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux, 2016;168:293–306.
20.
McLellanAT, LuborskyL, CacciolaJ, . New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers. J Nerv Ment Dis.1985;173:412–423.
21.
McLellanAT, KushnerH, MetgerD, . The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992;9:199–213.
22.
BergeronJ, LandryM, BrochuS, GuyonL. Les études psychométriques autour de L'ASI/IGT. In: GuyonL, LandryM, BrochuS, BergeronJ, eds. L'évaluation des clientèles alcooliques et toxicomanes. L'indice de gravité d'une toxicomanie (ASI/IGT). Québec, Canada: Les Presses de l'Université Laval; 1998:31–46.
23.
LeechNL, BarrettKC, MorganGA. IBM SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011.
24.
SimoneauH, KamgangE, TremblayJ, BertrandK, BrochuS, FleuryMJ. (submitted). Efficacy of extensive intervention models for substance use disorders: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev.In Press.
