No previous study has determined whether there are differences in the youth appeal of alcohol advertisements for popular versus unpopular brands among underage drinkers. This paper provides a systematic investigation of the differential appeal of brand-level alcohol advertisements among underage youth and young adults in the United States.
Methods
We examined 3 issues of 8 magazines popular among underage youth. From the advertised alcohol brands, we selected the ads for the top 10 and bottom 10 brands by prevalence of underage youth consumption, based on the results of a previous national survey. We assessed the ads’ appeal using a sample of 211 students recruited from 1 graduate and 2 undergraduate courses at Boston University. Respondents rated the appeal of each advertisement on 4 dimensions: physical and social appeal, appeal to underage youth, perceived effectiveness, and liking. Using random-effects linear regression, we compared the appeal of advertisements for popular versus unpopular brands.
Results
On each dimension, the ads for popular youth alcohol brands were rated as significantly more appealing than the ads for unpopular brands. The magnitude of this difference was 0.26 standard deviation for the physical and social appeal score, 0.25 for the appeal to underage youth score, 0.21 for the perceived effectiveness score, and 0.16 for the liking score.
Conclusions
Advertising for alcohol brands that are popular among youth contain elements that are more likely to appeal to underage youth and young adults than ads for brands that are relatively unpopular among young drinkers.
JohnstonLD, O'MalleyPM, BachmanJG, SchulenbergJE. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, Overview of Key Findings, 2012. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2012.
AndersonP, De BruijnA, AngusK, GordonR, HastingsG. Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009;44:229–243.
4.
Federal Trade Commission. Self-Regulation in the Alcohol Industry: Report of the Federal Trade Commission. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2014.
AitkenP, LeatharDS, ScottAC. Ten- to sixteen-year olds’ perceptions of advertisements for alcoholic drinks. Alcohol Alcohol. 1988;23:491–500.
7.
AitkenPP.Television alcohol commercials and under-age drinking. Int J Advertis. 1989;8:133–150.
8.
AustinE, HustS. Targeting adolescents? The content and frequency of alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverage ads in magazine and video formats November 1999–April 2000. J Health Commun. 2005;10:769–785.
9.
CraigR.The effect of television day part on gender portrayals in television commercials: a content analysis. Sex Roles. 1992;26:197–211.
10.
FielderL, DonovanR, OuschanR. Exposure of children and adolescents to alcohol advertising on Australian metropolitan free-to-air television. Addiction. 2009;104:1157–1165.
11.
JonesS, DonovanR. Messages in alcohol advertising targeted to youth. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25:126–131.
12.
JonesS, PhillipsonL, BarrieL. “Most men drink…especially like when they play sports”—alcohol advertising during sporting broadcasts and the potential impact on child audiences. J Public Affairs. 2010;10:59–73.
13.
MaddenPA, GrubeJW. The frequency and nature of alcohol and tobacco advertising in televised sports, 1990 through 1992. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:297–299.
14.
NashA, PineK, MesserD. Television alcohol advertising: do children really mean what they say?Br J Dev Psychol. 2009;27:85–104.
15.
StricklandD, FinnTA, LambertMD. A content analysis of beverage alcohol advertising. I. Magazine advertising. J Stud Alcohol1982;43:655–682.
16.
WaitersED, TrenoAJ, GrubeJW. Alcohol advertising and youth: a focus-group analysis of what young people find appealing in alcohol advertising. Contemp Drug Probl. 2001;28:695–718.
17.
SmithKC, CukierS, JerniganDH. Regulating alcohol advertising: content analysis of the adequacy of federal and self-regulation of magazine advertisements, 2008–2010. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:1901–1911.
18.
RhoadesE, JerniganDH. Risky messages in alcohol advertising, 2003–2007: results from content analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:116–121.
19.
ChenM-J, GrubeJW, BersaminM, WaitersE, KeefeDB. Alcohol advertising: what makes it attractive to youth?J Health Commun. 2005;10:553–565.
20.
BaborTF, XuanZ, DamonD. A new method for evaluating compliance with industry self-regulation codes governing the content of alcohol advertising. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:1787–1793.
21.
ProctorDC, BaborTF, XuanZ. Effects of cautionary messages and vulnerability factors on viewers’ perceptions of alcohol advertisements. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66:648–657.
22.
BaborTF, XuanZ, ProctorD. Reliability of a rating procedure to monitor industry self-regulation codes governing alcohol advertising content. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69:235–242.
23.
BaborTF, XuanZ, DamonD. Changes in the self-regulation guidelines of the US Beer Code reduce the number of content violations reported in TV advertisements. J Public Affairs. 2009;10:6–18.
24.
BaborTF, XuanZ, DamonD, NoelJ. An empirical evaluation of the US Beer Institute's self-regulation code governing the content of beer advertising. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:e45–e51.
25.
SiegelM, DeJongW, NaimiTS, . Brand-specific consumption of alcohol among underage youth in the United States. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:1195–1203.
26.
PedersenER, NeighborsC, LarimerME. Differential alcohol expectancies based on type of alcoholic beverage consumed. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010;71:925–929.
Anheuser-Busch InBev. Responsible Marketing and Communications Code. Joa, South Africa: Anheuser-Busch; 2014. Available at: http://www.ab-inbev.com/pdf/CCC_guide_EN.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2014.
