There is a growing awareness that the treatment of patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) should target increasing patients’ involvement in alternative pleasant reinforcers that compete with the reinforcing effects of substance use. The present cross-sectional study sought to identify factors that promote or impede engaging in pleasant activities.
Methods
Patients with SUDs (N = 265) were assessed at treatment entry on sociodemographic characteristics, primary type of substance (ie, alcohol or illicit drugs), addiction severity, craving, personality factors, and psychiatric distress.
Results
Regression analyses identified dissimilar predictor sets underlying frequency, enjoyability, and cross-product ratings, highlighting the multifaceted behavioral nature of activity engagement. Personality measures showed the strongest associations with patients’ activity engagement, with extraversion as the key predictor.
Conclusions
The present findings emphasize the complexity of patients’ involvement in pleasant non–substance-related activities and further investigation is necessary to gain more insight into the underlying mechanisms of activity engagement.
LeshnerAI. Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science.1997;278:45–47.
3.
McLellanAT. Is addiction an illness? Can it be treated?Subst Abus.2002;23:67–94.
4.
van den BrinkW, van ReeJM. Pharmacological treatments for heroin and cocaine addiction. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol.2003;13:476–487.
5.
BlumK, BravermanER, HolderJM, . Reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000;32(Suppl:i–iv):1–112.
6.
GoldsteinRZ, VolkowND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry.2002;159:1642–1652.
7.
VolkowND, FowlerJS, WangGJ. The addicted human brain: insights from imaging studies. J Clin Invest.2003;111:1444–1451.
8.
BijlRV, RavelliA. Current and residual functional disability associated with psychopathology: findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Psychol Med.2000;30:657–668.
9.
McCormickBP, FunderburkJA, LeeY. Activity characteristics and emotional experience: predicting boredom and anxiety in the daily life of community mental health clients. J Leisure Res.2005;37:236–253.
10.
SkinnerBF.The Behavior of Organisms. New York: Appleton-Century; 1938.
11.
CorreiaCJ, BensonTA, CareyKB. Decreased substance use following increases in alternative behaviors: a preliminary investigation. Addict Behav.2005;30:19–27.
12.
VuchinichRE, TuckerJA. Behavioral theories of choice as a framework for studying drinking behavior. J Abnormal Psychol.1983;92:408–416.
13.
VuchinichRE, TuckerJA. Contributions from behavioral theories of choice to an analysis of alcohol abuse. J Abnorm Psychol.1988;97:181–195.
14.
PantalonMV, FerroG, ChawarskiMC, . Voucher purchases in contingency management interventions for women with cocaine dependence. Addict Disord Their Treat.2004;3:27–35.
15.
SchottenfeldRS, PantalonMV, ChawarskiMC, PakesJO, EdM. Community reinforcement approach: patterns of engagement in alternate behaviors. J Subst Abuse Treat.2000;18:255–261.
16.
RoozenHG, WiersemaH, StrietmanM, . Development and psychometric evaluation of the pleasant activities list. Am J Addict.2008;17:422–435.
17.
MurphyJG, CorreiaCJ, ColbySM, VuchinichRE. Using behavioral theories of choice to predict drinking outcomes following a brief intervention. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol.2005;13:93–101.
18.
SkidmoreJR, MurphyJG. Relations between heavy drinking, gender, and substance-free reinforcement. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;18:158–166.
19.
RachlinH. Four teleological theories of addiction. Psychon Bull Rev.1997;4:462–473.
20.
EysenckHJ.The Biological Basis of Personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1967.
21.
EysenckHJ, EysenckSBG. Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1975.
22.
CostaPTJr, McCraeRR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.
23.
RoozenHG, EvansBE, WiersemaH, MeyersRJ. The influence of extraversion on preferences and engagement in pleasant activities in patients with substance use disorders: one size fits all? J Behav Anal Health Sports Fit Med.2009;2:56–67.
24.
RhodesRE, SmithNEI. Personality correlates of physical activity: a review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:958–965.
25.
KhanAA, JacobsonKC, GardnerCO, PrescottCA, KendlerKS. Personality and comorbidity of common psychiatric disorders. Br J Psychiatry.2005;186:190–196.
26.
BallSA. Personality traits, disorders, and substance abuse. In StelmackRM, ed. On the Psychobiology of Personality: Essays in Honor of Marvin Zuckerman. New York: Elsevier Science; 2004:203–222.
27.
ChapmanB, DubersteinP, LynessJM. Personality traits, education, and health-related quality of life among older adult primary care patients. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci.2007;62:343–352.
28.
RussoJ, KatonW, LinE, . Neuroticism and extraversion as predictors of health outcomes in depressed primary care patients. Psychosomatics1997;38:339–348.
29.
McCraeRR. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. J Pers Soc Psychol.1987;52:1258–1265.
30.
NowakowskaC, StrongCM, SantosaCM, WangPW, KetterTA. Temperamental commonalities and differences in euthymic mood disorder patients, creative controls, and healthy controls. J Affect Dis.2005;85:207–215.
31.
McCraeRR, SutinAR. Openness to experience. In Leary MR, Hoyle RH, eds. Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 2009:257–273.
32.
JerantAF, ChapmanBP, FranksP. Personality and EQ-5D Scores among individuals with chronic conditions. Qual Life Res.2008;17:1195–204.
33.
ZuckermanM.Behavioral Expression and Biosocial Bases Of Sensation Seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
34.
MichelG, CartonS, JouventR. Sensation seeking and anhedonia in risk-taking behaviors: study in bungee jumpers. Encephale.1997;23:403–411.
35.
KnyazevGG, SlobodskayaHR, KharchenkoII, WilsonGD. Personality and substance use in Russian youths: the predictive and moderating role of behavioural activation and gender. Pers Individ Dif.2004;37:827–843.
36.
ConwayKP, KaneRJ, BallSA, PolingJC, RounsavilleBJ. Personality, substance of choice, and polysubstance involvement among substance dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend.2003;71:65–75.
37.
DomG, HulstijnW, SabbeB. Differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking between early- and late-onset alcoholics. Addict Behav.2006;31:298–308.
38.
ConwayKP, ComptonW, StinsonFS, GrantBF. Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry.2006;67:247–257.
39.
RegierDA, MyersJK, KramerM, . The NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. Arch Gen Psychol.1984;41:942–948.
40.
RegierDA, FarmerME, RaeDS, . Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the epidemiologic catchment area (ECA) study. JAMA.1990;264:2511–2518.
41.
OrmelJ, VonKorffM, UstunTB, PiniS, KortenA, OldehinkelT. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures. Results from the WHO collaborative study on psychological problems in general health care. JAMA.1994;272:1741–1748.
42.
Roshanaei-MoghaddamB, KatonWJ, RussoJ. The longitudinal effects of depression on physical activity. Gen Hosp Psychol.2009;31:306–315.
43.
RobinsonTE, BerridgeKC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Rev.1993;18:247–291.
44.
VerheulR, van den BrinkW, GeerlingsP. A three-pathway psychobiological model of craving for alcohol. Alcohol Alcohol.1999;34:197–222.
45.
WiseRA. The neurobiology of craving: implications for the understanding and treatment of addiction. J Abnormal Psychol.1988;97: 118–132.
46.
KoobGF, VolkowND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology.2010;35:217–238.
47.
GaravanH, PankiewiczJ, BloomA, . Cue-induced cocaine craving: neuroanatomical specificity for drug users and drug stimuli. Am J Psychiatry.2000;157:1789–1798.
48.
MohnAR, YaoWD, CaronMG. Genetic and genomic approaches to reward and addiction. Neuropharmacology.2004;47(Suppl 1):101–110.
49.
MacKillopJ, O'HagenS, LismanSA, . Behavioral economic analysis of cue-elicited craving for alcohol. Addiction.2010; 105:1599–607.
50.
KokkeviA, HartgersC. European adaptation of a multidimensional assessment instrument for drug and alcohol dependents. Eur Addict Res.1995;1:208–210.
BeckAT, WardCH, MendelsonM, MockJ, ErbaughJ. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychol.1961;4:561–571.
53.
HoekstraHA, OrmelJ, De FruytF. NEO Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten: NEO-PI-R & NEO-FFI[Dutch]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1996.
54.
FeijJA, Van ZuilenRW. Spanningsbehoeftelijst (SBL) Manual[Dutch]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1984.
55.
ZuckermanM, KolinEA, PriceL, ZoobI. Development of a sensation-seeking scale. J Consult Clin Psychol.1964;28:477–482.
56.
FeijJA, DekkerPH, KoopmansJR, BoomsmaDI. Nieuwe normen en stabiliteitsgegevens voor de Spanningsbehoeftenlijst (SBL) [Dutch]. Ned Tijdschrift Psychologie.1997;52;131–134.
57.
EttemaJHM, ArrindellWA. SCL-90. Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator[Dutch]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger; 2003.
58.
ZackM, ToneattoT, StreinerDL. The SCL-90 factor structure in comorbid substance abusers. J Subst Abuse.1998;10:85–101.
59.
Does van derAJW. Handleiding bij de Nederlandse versie van Beck Depression Inventory—second edition (BDI-II-NL)[Dutch]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harcourt; 2002.
60.
DrobesDJ, ThomasSE. Assessing craving for alcohol. Alcohol Res Health.1999;23:179–186.
61.
MacPhillamyDJ, LewinsohnPM. The pleasant events schedule: studies on reliability, validity and scale intercorrelation. J Consult Clin Psychol.1982;50:363–380.
62.
RosenthalTL, MontgomeryLM, ShadishWRJr, LichsteinL. Leisure interest patterns and subjective stress in college students. Behav Res Ther.1989;27:59–64.
63.
CorreiaCJ, CareyKB. Applying behavioral theories of choice to drug use in a sample of psychiatric outpatients. Psychol Addict Behav.1999;13:207–212.
64.
GrosscupSJ, LewinsohnPM. Unpleasant and pleasant events, and mood. J Clin Psychol.1980;36:252–259.
CohenMX, YoungJ, BaekJM, KesslerC, RanganathC. Individual differences in extraversion and dopamine genetics predict neural reward responses. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res.2005;25:851–861.
67.
DepueRA, CollinsPF. Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behav Brain Sci.1999;22:491–517.
68.
LucasRE, DienerE, CrobA, SuhEM, ShaoL. Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. J Pers Soc Psychol.2000;79:452–468.
69.
FishmanI, NgR, BellugiU. Do Extraverts process social stimuli differently from introverts?Cogn Neurosci.2011;2:67–73.
70.
ClarkLA, WatsonD, MinekaS. Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. J Abnorm Psychol.1994;103:103–116.
71.
FrancisLJ. The relationship between Eysenck's personality factors and attitude towards substance use among 13–15-year-olds. Pers Individ Dif.1996;21:633–640.
72.
HillSY, ShenS, LowersL, LockeJ. Factors predicting the onset of adolescent drinking in families at high risk for developing alcoholism. Biol Psychiatry.2000;48:265–275.
73.
HillSY, YuanH. Familial density of alcoholism and onset of adolescent drinking. J Stud Alcohol.1999;60:7–17.
74.
ParkA, SherKJ, WoodPK, KrullJL. Dual mechanisms underlying accentuation of risky drinking via fraternity/sorority affiliation: the role of personality, peer norms, and alcohol availability. J Abnorm Psychol.2009;118:241–255.
75.
RoozenHG, van de WeteringBJ. Neuropsychiatric insights in clinical practice: from relapse prevention toward relapse management. Am J Addict.2007;16:530–531.
HerrnsteinRJ. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav.1970;13:243–66.
78.
BroosN, SchmaalL, WiskerkeJ, . The relationship between impulsive choice and impulsive action: a cross-species translational study. PLoS ONE.2012;7:e36781.
