Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Heroin-abusing patients present a significant challenge. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) allow evaluation of residents’ clinical skills. The objective of this study was to examine residents’ OSCE performance assessing and managing heroin abuse.

Methods

Evaluation and comparison of heroin-specific communication, assessment, and management skills in a 5-station postgraduate year 3 (PGY3) substance abuse OSCE. Faculty used a 4-point Likert scale to assess residents’ skills; standardized patients provided written comments.

Results

Two hundred sixty-five internal and family medicine residents in an urban university hospital participated over 5 years. In the heroin station, residents’ skills were better (P < .001 for both comparisons) in communication (mean overall score: 316 ± 0.51) than in either assessment (mean overall score: 2.66 ± 0.60) or management (mean overall score: 2.50 ± 0.73). The mean score for assessing specific high-risk behaviors was lower than the mean overall assessment score (222 ± 1.01 vs. 2.74 ± .59; P < .0001), and the mean score for recommending appropriate harm reduction management strategies was lower than the mean overall management score (2.39 ± .89 vs. 2.54 ± .74; P < .005). Standardized patients’ comments reflected similar weaknessess in residents’ skills.

Conclusions

Assessment and management of heroin abuse were more challenging for residents than general communication. Additional training is required for residents to assess and counsel patients about high-risk behaviors.

Keywords

Heroin addiction Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)substance abuse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Results from 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: national findings. Available at: http://www.oas.samsha.gov/NSDUH/2k7NSDUH/2k7results.cfm. Accessed September 15, 2008

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). 2008. “Office of Applied Study”. In 2006: National Estimates of Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits, Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. DAWN Series D-30, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 08-4339. Available at: https://dawninfo.samsha.gov/files/ED2006/DAWN2k6ED.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2008

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2007. “Office of Applied Studies”. In Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) Highlights. 2006 National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services, Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. OAS Series S-40, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 08-4313. Available at: http://www.oas.samsha.gov/teds2k6highlights/toc.cfm. Accessed July 15, 2008

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Office of Applied Studies. April 26, 2007. Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS). The DASIS report: heroine—changes in how it is used, 1995–2005. Available at: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k7/heroinTX/heroinTX.cfm. Accessed September 15, 2008

Stimmel

, Cohen

, Colliver

and Swarz

. 2000. An assessment of house staff's knowledge of alcohol and substance abuse utilizing standardized patients. Subst Abus, 21: 1–7.

Lewis

D C

. 2001. The role of internal medicine in addiction medicine. J Addict Dis, 15: 1–17.

Fleming

1990. “Competencies for substance abuse training”. In Training About Alcohol and Substance Abuse for All Primary Care Physicians, Edited by: Lewis

D C

and Sirca

. 213–247. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.

Flemming

M F

, Mundtm

M P

, French

M T

, Manwell

L B

, Stauffacher

E A

and Barry

K L

. 2000. Brief physician advice for problem drinkers: long-term efficacy and benefit-cost analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 26: 36–43.

Mathew

T A

, Shields

A L

and Imasheva

. 2009. et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of physicians in Tomsk Oblast tuberculosis services regarding alcohol use among tuberculosis patients in Tomsk, Russia. Cult Med Psychiatry, 33: 523–537.

10.

Murphy

S A

, Scott

C S

and Mander

L S

. 1995. Evaluating students’ substance abuse skills. J Subst Abuse, 7: 357–364.

11.

Harden

R M

and Gleason

F A

. 1979. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ, 13: 41–47.

12.

Anderson

M B

, Stillman

P L

and Wang

. 1994. Growing use of standardized patients in teaching and evaluation in medical education. Teach Learn Med., 6: 15–22.

13.

Sloan

D A

, Plymale

M A

, Donnelly

M B

, Schwartz

R W

, Edwards

M J

and Bland

K I

. 2004. Enhancing the clinical skills of surgical residents through structured cancer education. Ann Surg., 239: 561–566.

14.

Carraccio

and Englander

. 2000. The objective structured clinical examination: a step in the direction of competency-based evaluation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 154: 736–741.

15.

Hodder

R V

, Rivington

R N

, Calcutt

L E

and Hart

I R

. 1989. The effectiveness of immediate feedback during the objective structured clinical examination. J Med Educ, 23: 184–188.

16.

Sloan

D A

, Donnelly

M B

, Schwartz

R W

, Felts

J L

, Blue

A V

and Strodel

W E

. 1996. The use of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in for evaluation and instruction in graduate medical education. J Surg Res, 63: 225–230.

17.

Parish

S J

, Ramaswamy

, Stein

, Kachur

E K

and Arnsten

J H

. 2006. Teaching about substance abuse with objective structured clinical exams. J Gen Intern Med, 21: 453–459.

18.

Kahan

, Wilson

, Midmer

, Borsoi

and Martin

. 2003. Randomized controlled trial on the effects of a skills-based workshop on medical students’ management of problem drinking and alcohol dependence. Subst Abus, 24: 5–16.

19.

Matthews

, Kadish

, Barrett

S V

, Mazor

, Field

and Jonassen

. 2002. The impact of a brief interclerkship about substance abuse on medical students’ skills. Acad Med, 77: 419–426.

20.

Levin

F R

, Owen

, Stinchfield

, Rabinowitz

and Pace

. 1999. Use of standardized patients to evaluate the physician's in residence program: a substance abuse training approach. J Addict Dis., 18: 39–50.

21.

Wilk

A I

and Jensen

N M

. 2002. Investigation of a brief teaching encounter using standardized patients: teaching residents alcohol screening and intervention. J Gen Intern Med., 17: 356–360.

22.

Walsh

R A

, Sanson-Fisher

R W

, Low

and Roche

A M

. 1999. Teaching medical students alcohol intervention skills: results of a controlled trial. Med Educ, 33: 559–565.

23.

Netherland

, Botsko

and Egan

J E

. 2009. Factors affecting willingness to provide buprenorphine treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat, 36: 244–251.

24.

Walley

A Y

, Alperan

J K

Cheng

D M

. 2008. Office-Based management of opioid dependence with bupenorphine: clinical practices and barriers. J Gen Intern Med, 23: 1393–1398.

25.

Ritter

and Cameron

. 2006. A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of harm reduction strategies for alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs. Drug Alcohol Rev, 25: 611–624.

26.

Stein

M R

, Arnsten

J H

, Parish

S J

and Kunins

H V

. 2011. Evaluation of a substance abuse use disorder curriculum for internal medicine residents. Subst Abus., 32: 220–224.