Objective: In this study, 218 national drug rehabilitation center helpers in Malaysia were surveyed regarding perceptions of their on-the-job clinical supervision needs and preferred supervisor roles and emphasis areas in their supervision sessions. Methods: Descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Findings suggest that drug rehabilitation center helpers in Malaysia expressed high level of on-the-job supervision needs. In addition, professional behavior skills were found to be the most desirable supervisory area followed by process, conceptualization, and personalization skills. Conclusions: Implications for providing clinical supervision for drug rehabilitation center helpers in Malaysia were discussed, along with suggestions for future research.
BernardJ M and GoodyearR K. 2004. Fundamentals of Clinical Supervision, London: Pearson.
2.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2009. Clinical supervision and professional development of the substance abuse counselor. Available at: kap.samhsa.gov/products/manuals/tips/pdf/TIP52.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2012
3.
KnudsenH K, DucharmeL J and RomanP M. 2008. Clinical supervision, emotional exhaustion, and turnover intention: a study of substance abuse treatment counselors in the Clinical Trials Network of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. J Subst Abuse Treat, 35: 387–395.
4.
NAADAC, The Association for Addiction Professionals. 2003. NAADAC, The Association for Addiction Professionals Practitioner Services Network Year 2 Final Report: A Survey of Early Career Substance Abuse Counselors, Washington, DC: NAADAC, The Association for Addiction Professionals. Available at: http://naadac.org/pressroom/files/Year2SurveyReport.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2011
5.
AbdullahR.2008. Promoting public safety and controlling recidivism using effective interventions amongst illicit drug offenders: an examination of best practices. Available at: http://222.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No74_14PA_Abdullah.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2012
ScorzelliJF.1987. Counseling in Malaysia: an emerging profession. J Couns Dev., 65: 238–240.
9.
FarishJ, See ChingM and YazdaniN. 2010. Stress and burnout among Malaysian alcohol and drug counselors. Researcher Interdiscip J, 23: 69–85.
10.
ShultzJ C, OsoskieJ N, FriedJ H, NelsonR E and BardosA N. 2002. Clinical supervision in public rehabilitation counselor settings. Rehabil Couns Bull, 45: 213–222.
11.
AndersonC.2000. Supervision of substance abuse counselors using the integrated developmental model. Clin Supervisor, 19: 185–199.
12.
LanningW.1986. Development of the supervisor emphasis rating form. Counselor Educ Superv., 25: 191–196.
13.
StoltenbergCD.1981. Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: the counselor complexity model. J Couns Psychol., 28: 59–65.
LoganbillC, HardyE and DelworthU. 1982. Supervision: a conceptual model. Couns Psychol., 10: 3–42.
16.
LittrellJ M, Lee-BordenN and LorenzJ A. 1979. A developmental framework for counseling supervision. Counselor Educ Superv., 19: 119–136.
17.
BradleyL J and KottlerJ A. 2004. “Overview of counselor supervision”. In Counselor Supervision: Principles, Process, and Practice. , 3rd ed, Edited by: BradleyL J and LadanyN. 3–27. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
18.
TanSY.1999. Relationships of School Counsellors’ Perceptions of Supervision Needs with Job Performance and Job Involvement [unpublished PhD dissertation], Malaysia: University Putra Malaysia. Selangor
19.
LanningW and FreemanB. 1994. The Supervisor Emphasis Rating Form—Revised. Counselor Educ Superv., 34(4): 1–51.
20.
KimB S, AtkinsonD R and UmemotoD. 2001. Asian cultural values and the counseling process: current knowledge and directions for future research. Couns Psychol., 29: 570–603.
21.
CoreyG.2008. Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy, Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
