The Obama Administration is striving to promote both public health and public safety by improving the public policy response to criminal offenders who have substance use disorders. This includes supporting drug courts, evidence-based probation and parole programs, addiction treatment and re-entry programs. Scientists and clinicians in the addiction field have a critical role to play in this much-needed effort to break the cycle of addiction, crime and incarceration.
ChandlerR K, FletcherB W and VolkowN D. 2009. Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. JAMA., 301: 183–190.
2.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. 2009. ADAM II: 2008 Annual Report, Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, The White House.
3.
GreenfieldLA.Alcohol and Crime: An Analysis of National Data on the Prevalence of Alcohol Involvement in Crime, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 1998. Bureau of Justice Statistics (NCJ168632).
4.
KarbergJ C and JamesD J. Substance Dependence, Abuse, and Treatment of Jail Inmates, 2002, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 2005. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (NCJ209588).
5.
MumolaC and KarbergJ C. Drug Use and Dependence, State and Federal Prisoners, 2004, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 2006. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (NCJ213530).
6.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. 2010. National Drug Control Strategy, Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, The White House.
7.
HumphreysK and McLellanA T. 2010. Brief Intervention, treatment and recovery support services for Americans who have substance use disorders: an overview of policy in the Obama Administration. Psychol Serv., 7: 275–284.
8.
GottfredsonD C, NajakaS S and KearlyB. 2003. Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: evidence from a randomized trial. Criminol Public Policy, 2: 171–196.
9.
KleimanMAR.2009. When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
HawkenA and KleimanM AR. 2009. Managing Drug Involved Probationers with Swift and Certain Sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii's HOPE, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
11.
FletcherB W and ChandlerR K. 2006. Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations, Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
12.
BaborT, CaulkinsJEdwardsG. 2010. Drug Policy and the Public Good, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
FinneyJ W, MoosR H and HumphreysK. 1999. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: II. Linking proximal outcomes of 12-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment to substance use outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 23: 537–547.
14.
McKayJR.2009. Treating Substance Use Disorders with Adaptive Continuing Care, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
HumphreysK, WingSMcCartyD. 2004. Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems: towards evidence-based practice and policy. J Subst Abuse Treat, 26: 151–158.
16.
StrangJ, BaborT, CaulkinsJ, FischerB, FoxcroftD and HumphreysK. In press. Drug policy and the public good: Evidence for effective interventions. Lancet,
17.
CovielloD M, CornishJ WLynchK G. A multisite pilot study of depot naltrexone treatment for opioid-dependent offenders. Subst Abuse, 332012this issue
18.
BirdS M and HutchinsonS J. 2003. Male drugs-related deaths in the fortnight after release from prison: Scotland, 1996–99. Addiction, 98: 185–190.
