Theory suggests that mindful individuals exhibit enhanced attentional processing (e.g., attentional control) and that they maintain a detached perspective to problematic stimuli. For smokers, smoking and affective stimuli are problematic stimuli when they try to quit. In this cross-sectional study, smokers (n = 158) completed 3 modified Stroop tasks (to assess attentional control), 3 Implicit Association Tests (IATs; to assess detached perspective), and a battery of self-report assessments. Degree of mindfulness was negatively associated (P < .05) with self-reported negative affect, perceived stress, and depressive symptom severity, and positively associated (P < .05) with positive affect. Degree of mindfulness was not associated with the ability to disengage attention from smoking or affective stimuli. On the depression IAT, more mindful participants exhibited a more negative IAT effect, suggesting that they may have developed a detached perspective to depression-related stimuli. Theoretical and clinical implications of the data are discussed.
DavisJ M, FlemingM F, BonusK A and BakerT B. 2007. A pilot study on mindfulness based stress reduction for smokers. BMC Comple Altern Med, 7: 2doi:10.1186/1472-6882-7-2
2.
GiffordE V, KohlenbergB S, HayesS C, AntonuccioD O, PiaseckiM M, Rasmussen-HallM L and PalmK M. 2004. Acceptance-based treatment for smoking cessation. Behav Ther, 35: 689–705.
3.
MarlattG A, WitkiewitzK, DillworthT M, BowenS W, ParksG A, MacPhersonL M, LonczakH S, LarimerM E, SimpsonT, BlumeA W and CrutcherR. 2004. “Vipassana meditation as a treatment for alcohol and drug use disorders”. In Mindfulness and Acceptance: Expanding the Cognitive-Behavioral Tradition, Edited by: HayesS C, LinehanM M and FolletteV M. 261–287. New York: Guildford Press.
4.
WitkiewitzK, MarlattG A and WalkerD. 2006. Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for alcohol and substance use disorders: the meditative tortoise wins the race. J Cogn Psychother, 19: 211–228.
5.
ZgierskaA, RabagoD, ZuelsdorffM, CoeC, MillerM and FlemingM. 2008. Mindfulness meditation for alcohol relapse prevention: a feasibility pilot study. J Addict Med, 2: 165–173.
6.
Kabat-ZinnJ. 1994. Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation in Everyday Life, New York: Hyperion.
7.
ShapiroS L, CarlsonL E, AstinJ A and FreedmanB. 2006. Mechanisms of mindfulness. J Clin Psychol, 62: 373–386.
PosnerM I and PetersenS E. 1990. The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci, 13: 25–42.
10.
ChambersR, Chuen Yee LoB and AllenN B. 2008. The impact of intensive mindfulness training on attentional control, cognitive style, and affect. Cogn Ther Res, 32: 303–322.
11.
TeasdaleJ D, SegalZ and WilliamsJ MG. 1995. How does cognitive therapy prevent depressive relapse and why should attentional control (mindfulness) training help?. Behav Res Ther, 33: 25–39.
12.
TeasdaleJ D, MooreR G, HayhurstH, PopeM, WilliamsS and SegalZ V. 2002. Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: empirical evidence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70: 275–287.
13.
SlagterH A, LutzA, GreischarL L, FrancisA D, NieuwenhuisS, DavisJ M and DavidsonR J. 2007. Mental training affects distribution of limited brain resources. PLoS Biol, 5: e138
14.
HayesS C, StrosahlK and WilsonK G. 1999. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change, New York: Guilford Press.
15.
BrownK and RyanR. 2003. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and Its role in psychological well-being. J Person Soc Psychol, 84: 822–848.
16.
BaerR A, SmithG T, LykinsE, ButtonD, KrietmeyerJ, SauerS, WalshE, DugganD and WilliamsJ MG. 2008. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and non-meditating samples. Assessment, 15: 329–342.
17.
WetterD W, KenfordS L, SmithS S, FioreM C, JorenbyD E and BakerT B. 1999. Gender differences in smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol, 67: 555–562.
18.
BakerT B, PiperM E, McCarthyD E, MajeskieM R and FioreM C. 2004. Addiction motivation reformulated: an affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychol Rev, 111: 33–51.
19.
WatersA J, ShiffmanS, SayetteM A, PatyJ A, GwaltneyC G and BalabanisM H. 2003. Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Health Psychol, 22: 378–387.
20.
VidrineJ I, BusinelleM S, CinciripiniP, LiY, MarcusM T, WatersA J, ReitzelL R and WetterD W. 2009. Associations of mindfulness with nicotine dependence, withdrawal, and agency. Subs Abuse, 30: 318–327.
21.
RadloffL. 1977. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measure, 1: 385–401.
22.
BaerR, SmithG and AllenK. 2004. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11: 191–206.
23.
WetterD W, CarmackC L, AndersonC B, MooreC A, De MoorC A, CinciripiniP M and HirshkowitzM. 2000. Tobacco withdrawal signs and symptoms among women with and without a history of depression. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 8: 88–96.
24.
WatsonD, ClarkL A and TellegenA. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. J Person Soc Psychol, 54: 1063–1070.
25.
CohenS, KamarckT and MermelsteinR. 1983. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav, 24: 385–396.
26.
WetterD W, SmithS S, KenfordS L, JorenbyD E, FioreM C, HurtR D, OffordK P and BarkerT B. 1994. Smoking outcome expectancies: factor structure, predictive validity, and discriminant validity. J Abnorm Psychol, 103: 801–811.
27.
RobinsonT E and BerridgeK C. 1993. The neural basis of craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev, 18: 247–291.
28.
WiersR W and StacyA W, eds. 2006. Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
CoxW M, FadardiJ S and PothosE M. 2006. The addiction-Stroop test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol Bull, 132: 443–476.
30.
SwansonJ E, RudmanL A and GreenwaldA G. 2001. Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatized behaviour. Cogn Emot, 15: 207–230.
31.
GemarM C, SegalZ V, SagratiS and KennedyS J. 2001. Mood-induced changes on the Implicit Association Test in recovered depressed patients. J Abnorm Psychol, 110: 282–289.
32.
WilliamsJ MG, MathewsA and MacLeodC. 1996. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull, 120: 3–24.
33.
OstafinB D and MarlattG A. 2008. Surfing the urge: experiential acceptance moderates the relation between automatic alcohol motivation and hazardous drinking. J Soc Clin Psychol, 27: 404–418.
de HouwerJ. 2002. The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychology. Behav Ther Exp Psychol, 53: 115–133.
36.
WatersA J, CarterB L, RobinsonJ D, WetterD W, LamC Y and CinciripiniP M. 2007. Implicit attitudes to smoking are associated with craving and dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend, 91: 178–186.
37.
GreenwaldA G, NosekA and BanajiM R. 2003. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: 1. An improved scoring algorithm. J Person Soc Psychol, 85: 197–216.
38.
McKennaF P and SharmaD. 2004. Reversing the emotional Stroop effect: the role of fast and slow components. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cogn, 30: 382–392.
39.
WatersA J, SayetteM A, FrankenI HA and SchwartzJ. 2005. Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Behav Res Ther, 43: 715–732.
40.
PhafR H and KanK-J. 2007. The automaticity of emotional Stroop: a meta-analysis. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 38: 184–199.
41.
KuceraH and FrancisW N. 1967. Computational Analysis of Present Day American English, Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
42.
HavlicekL L and PetersonN L. 1977. Effect of the violation of assumptions upon significance levels of the Pearson r. Psychol Bull, 84: 373–377.
43.
WatersA J and SayetteM A. 2006. “Implicit cognition and tobacco addiction”. In Handbook on Implicit Cognition and Addiction, Edited by: WiersR W and StacyA W. 309–338. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
