The objective of this study was to test a framework based upon the value and the probability of outcomes related to smoking. Over a 2-week period, 80 women were asked to perform judgments of value and probability of the outcome for smoking-related consequences. Subgroups were formed by the two variables of pregnancy and intent to quit smoking. Judgments were performed given the conditions of quitting and not quitting smoking. The intent to quit or not quit smoking had an impact on expected utility of smoking. Moreover, there was a difference between expected utility given the conditions of not quitting smoking and quitting smoking. A framework based upon values and beliefs appears to be useful in describing the addictive behavior of smoking and can be applied in developing smoking-cessation education.
HigginsS T, HeilS H, DumeerA M, ThomasC S, SolomonL J and BernsteinI M2006Smoking status in the initial weeks of quitting as a predictor of smoking-cessation outcomes in pregnant women. Drug Alcohol Depend85: 138–141
2.
MullenP D2004How can more smoking suspension during pregnancy become life-long abstinence? Lessons learned about predictors, interventions, and gaps in our accumulated knowledge. Nicotine Tob Res6: 217–238
3.
HutchisonK E, StevensV M and CollinsLJr1996Cigarette smoking and the intention to quit among pregnant smokers. J Behav Med19: 307–316
4.
HaslamC and DraperE2000Stage of change is associated with assessment of the health risks of maternal smoking among pregnant women. Soc Sci Med51: 1189–1196
5.
CarmodyT H1992Preventing relapse in the treatment of nicotine addiction: current issues and future directions. J Psychoactive Drugs24: 131–158
6.
BrownellK D, MarlattG A, LichtensteinE and WilsonG T1986Understanding and preventing relapse. Am Psychol41: 765–782
7.
RuggieroL, TsohJ Y, EverettK, FavaJ L and GuiseB J2000The transtheoretical model of smoking: comparison of pregnant and nonpregnant smokers. Addict Behav25: 239–251
8.
O'ConnellK A, HoseinV L, SchwartzJ E and LeibowitzR Q2007How does coping help people resist lapses during smoking cessation?. Health Psychol26: 77–84
9.
BledsoeL K2006Smoking cessation: An application of theory of planned behavior to understanding progress through stages of change. Addict Behav31: 1271–1276
10.
ProchaskaJ O, DiClementeC C and NorcrossJ C1992In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol47: 1102–1114
11.
PlummerB A, VelicerW F, ReddingC A, ProchaskaJ O, RossiJ SPallonenU E2001Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking: measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents. Addict Behav26: 551–571
12.
PollakK I, CarbonariJ P, DiClementeC C, NiemannY F and MullenP D1998Causal relationships of processes of change and decisional balance: stage-specific models for smoking. Addict Behav23: 437–448
13.
ThyrianJ R, HannoverW, GremplerJ, RoskeK, JohnU and HapkeU2006An intervention to support postpartum women to quit smoking or remain smoke-free. J Midwifery Women's Health51: 45–50
14.
SullivanM.2003The new subjective medicine: taking the patient's point of view on health care and health. Soc Sci Med56: 1595–1604
15.
KayE J2001Risks and values in treatment decision making. Prim Dent Care8: 105–109
16.
AdesA E, LuG and ClaxtonK2004Expected value of sample information calculations in medical decision making. Med Decis Making24: 207–227
17.
ClaxtonK, GinnellyL, SculperM, PhilipsZ and PalmerS2004A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme. Health Technol Assess8: 1–103iii
18.
SchultzW2006Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annu Rev Psychol57: 87–115
19.
TverskyA1967Additivity, utility and subjective probability. J Math Psychol4: 175–201
20.
YoonJ H, HigginsS T, HeilS H, SugarbakerR J, ThomasC S and BadgerG J2007Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol15: 176–186
21.
ReynoldsB, RichardsJ B, HornK and KarrakerK2004Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults. Behav Processes65: 35–42
22.
HughesJ R2007Effects of abstinence from tobacco: valid symptoms and time course. Nicotine Tob Res9: 315–327
23.
OrtendahlM1996Health and Time—A Problem of Discounting.Stockholm: Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.
24.
MontgomeryD C1991Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.
25.
DanielW W1995Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences, 6th ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26.
ShadelW G, NiauraR, GoldsteinM G and AbramsD B2001Cognitive avoidance as a method of coping with a provocative smoking cue: the moderating effects of nicotine dependence. J Behav Med24: 169–182
27.
RosenC S2000Is the sequencing of change processes by stage consistent across health problems? A meta-analysis. Health Psychol19: 593–604
28.
CurryS J, McBrideC, GrothausL, LandoH and PirieP2001Motivation for smoking cessation among pregnant women. Psychol Addict Behav15: 126–132
29.
RundmoT, SmedslundG and GotestamK G1997Motivation for smoking cessation among the Norwegian public. Addict Behav22: 377–386
30.
BalabanovaD, BobakM and McKeeM1998Patterns of smoking in Bulgaria. Tob Control7: 383–385
31.
StueveA and O'DonnelL2007Continued smoking and smoking cessation among urban young adult women: findings from the Reach for Health longitudinal study. Am J Public Health97: 1408–1411
32.
BernsteinI M, MongeonJ A, BadgerG J, SolomonL, HeilS H and HigginsS T2005Maternal smoking and its association with birth weight. Obstet Gynecol106: 986–991(5 Pt 1)
33.
PickettK E, WakschlagL S, DaiL and LeventhalB L2003Fluctuations of maternal smoking during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol101: 140–147
