Referral to Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) is a common continuing care recommendation. Evidence suggests some youth benefit, yet, despite referrals, youth participation is low. Little is known about adolescents’ experiences of AA/NA. Greater knowledge would inform and help tailor aftercare recommendations.
Method
Two clinical samples of youth (N = 74 and N = 377) were asked about their perceptions of, and experiences with, AA/NA with responses categorized by content into domains assessed for face validity and reliability.
Results
The aspects of AA/NA youth liked best were general group dynamic processes related to universality, support, and instillation of hope. The most common reason for discontinuing was boredom/lack of fit.
Conclusions
General group-therapeutic, and not 12-step-specific, factors are most valued by youth during early stages of recovery and/or degree of AA/NA exposure. Many youth discontinue due to a perceived lack of fit, suggesting a mismatch between some youth and aspects of AA/NA.
SAMHSA. 2005. Treatment Admissions for Alcohol Abuse, Alone and with a Drug Problem, Arlington: Office of Applied Studies.
2.
BuksteinO G. 1995. Adolescent Substance Abuse: Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment, New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.
3.
Drug Strategies. 2003. Treating teens: A guide to adolescent programs, Washington, DC: Drug Strategies.
4.
HumphreysK. 1997. Clinicians’ referral and matching of substance abuse patients to self-help groups after treatment. Psychiatr Serv, 48: 1445–1449.
5.
HumphreysK. 2004. Circles of Recovery: Self-help organizations for addictions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
EmrickC D, ToniganJ S, MontgomeryH and LittleL. 1993. “Alcoholics Anonymous: What is currently known?”. In Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives, Edited by: BarbaraE, McCradyE and MillerW R. 41–76. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Alcohol Studies.
7.
KellyJ F. 2003. Self-help for substance use disorders: History, effectiveness, knowledge gaps, and research opportunities. Clin Psychol Rev, 23: 639–663.
8.
KellyJ F, StoutR, ZywiakW and SchneiderR. 2006. A 3-year study of addiction mutual-help group participation following intensive outpatient treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 30: 1381–1392.
9.
ToniganJ S, ToscovaR and MillerW R. 1996. Meta-analy-sis of the literature on Alcoholics Anonymous: Sample and study characteristics moderate findings. J Stud Alcohol, 57: 65–72.
10.
KellyJ F and MyersM G. 2007. Adolescents’ participation in alcoholics anonymous and narcotics anonymous: Review, implications, and future directions. J Psychoactive Drugs, 39: 259–269.
11.
AlfordG S, KoehlerR A and LeonardJ. 1991. Alcoholics Anonymous-Narcotics Anonymous model inpatient treatment of chemically dependent adolescents: A 2-year outcome study. J Stud Alcohol, 52: 118–126.
12.
BrownS A, MottM A and MyersM G. 1990. “Adolescent alcohol and drug treatment outcome”. In Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention. Drug and Alcohol Abuse Reviews, Edited by: RonaldE and WatsonR. 373–403. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, Inc.
13.
HsiehS, HoffmanN G and HollisterD C. 1998. The Relationship between pre-, during-, post-treatment factors, and adolescent substance abuse behaviors. Addict Behav, 23: 477–488.
14.
KellyJ F, MyersM G and BrownS A. 2000. A multivariate process model of adolescent 12-Step attendance and substance use outcome following inpatient treatment. Psychol Addict Behav, 14: 376–389.
15.
KellyJ F, MyersM G and BrownS A. 2002. Do adolescents affiliate with 12-Step groups? A multivariate process model of effects. J Stud Alcohol, 63: 293–304.
16.
MasonM J and LuckeyB. 2003. Young adults in alcohol-other drug treatment: An understudied population. Alcohol Treat Q, 21: 17–32.
17.
StewartD G and BrownS A. 1995. Withdrawal and dependency symptoms among adolescent alcohol and drug abusers. Addiction, 90: 627–635.
18.
TimsF M, DennisM L, HamiltonN, BuchanB J, DiamondG S, FunkR and BrantleyL B. 2002. Characteristics and problems of 600 adolescent marijuana abusers in outpatient treatment. Addiction, 97: 46–57.
19.
Alcoholics Anonymous. 2005. New York2004 Membership Survey. Edited by Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Incorporated
20.
DeasD, RiggsP, LangenbucherJ, GoldmanM and BrownS. 2000. Adolescents are not adults: Developmental considerations in alcohol users. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 24: 232–237.
21.
KellyJ F, MyersM G and BrownS A. 2005. The effects of age composition of 12-Step groups on adolescent 12-Step participation and substance use outcome. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 15: 67–76.
22.
Alcoholics Anonymous. 1953. Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.
23.
Alcoholics Anonymous. 2001. Alcoholics Anonymous: The Story of How Thousands of Men and Women Have Recovered from Alcoholism, New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.
24.
YalomI D. 1995. Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, New York: Basic Books.
25.
HowardK I, LuegerR J, MalingM S and MartinovichZ. 1993. A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change. J Consult Clin Psychol, 61: 678–685.
26.
TapertS F, BrownG G, BarattaM V and BrownS A. 2004. fMRI BOLD response to alcohol stimuli in alcohol dependent young women. Addict Behav, 29: 33–50.
27.
TapertS F, BrownG G, KindermannS S, CheungE H, FrankL R and BrownS A. 2001. fMRI measurement of brain dysfunction in alcohol-dependent young women. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 25: 236–245.
28.
StussD T and LevineB. 2002. Adult clinical neuropsy-chology: Lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annu Rev Psychol, 53: 401–433.
29.
TapertS F and BrownS A. 1999. Neuropsychological correlates of adolescent substance abuse: Four-year outcomes. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 5: 481–493.
30.
SeemanP. 1999. Images in neuroscience Brain development, X: pruning during development. Am J Psychiatry, 156: 168
31.
MorganD, GrantK A, MachR H, GageH D, EhrenkauferR L, KaplanJ R, PrioleauO A, NaderS H, BuchheimerN and NaderM A. 2002. Social dominance in monkeys: Dopamine D2 receptors and cocaine self-administration. Nat Neurosci, 5: 169–174.
32.
RaichleM E. 2005. “Social neuroscience: A perspective”. In Social Neu-roscience: People Thinking About People, Edited by: CacioppoJ T, VisserP S and PickettC L. 287–296. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
NowinskiJ, BakerS and CarrollK M. 1992. Twelve-Step Facilitation Therapy Manual: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence, Vol. 1, Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. in NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)92–1893
34.
2002. Narcotics Anonymous World Services I
35.
KennedyB P and MinamiM. 1993. The Beech Hill Hospital/Outward Bound Adolescent Chemical Dependency Treatment Program. J Subst Abuse Treat, 10: 395–406.
36.
ScottC K, DennisM L and FossM A. 2005. Utilizing recovery management checkups to shorten the cycle of relapse, treatment reentry, and recovery. Drug Alcohol Depend, 78: 325–338.
37.
PassettiL L. Adolescents’ perceptions of the 12 steps and 12-step philosophy. Joint Meeting on Adolescent Treatment Effectiveness. 2006, Baltimore, MD.
