International competition occurs in many different forms. Just as a state would be in danger if it allowed its opponent to gain a military advantage, one that falls behind a rival in an economic contest similarly faces risks. States must weigh the trade-offs between economic and military growth, as well as deciding on the best strategy to follow should war erupt. We use a formal, dynamic model to explicitly capture the trade-offs that states face in their search for security and dominance. The deductions from the model demonstrate that by considering the long-run results of a peacetime rivalry, weaker states might conclude that their only hope of winning or surviving a rivalry lies in fighting a counterforce war, explain why and how stalemates evolve during counterforce wars, and indicate that targeting industrial objectives shortens the duration of wars.
Arena, P.2008. Success breeds success? War outcomes, domestic opposition, and elections. Conflict Management and Peace Science25(2): 136-151.
2.
Bellany, I.1999. Modelling war. Journal of Peace Research36(7): 729-739.
3.
Brown, C.2007. Differential equations: A modeling approach. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
Cohen, J.1995. Population growth and earth's human carrying capacity . Science269: 341-346.
5.
Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy, 1988. Discriminate deterrence. Washington, DC: General Printing Office.
6.
Drazen, A.2000. Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.
Edwards, C.H., and D. Penny.1985. Elementary differential equations with applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8.
Felmlee, D., and D. Greenberg.1999. A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction . Journal of Mathematical Sociology23(3): 155-180.
9.
Gartner, S.S.2008A. Secondary casualty information: Casualty uncertainty, female casualties, and wartime support. Conflict Management and Peace Science25(2): 98-111.
10.
Gartner, S.S.2008B. Reopening the black box of war: War and domestic politics . Conflict Management and Peace Science25(2): 95-97.
11.
Gilpin, R.1981. War & change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Hirshleifer, J.1988. The analytics of continuing conflict. Synthese76: 201-233.
13.
Jervis, R.1978. Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics30(2): 167-214.
14.
Kadera, K.M.2001. The power-conflict story: A dynamic model of interstate rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Kadera, K.M.1998. Transmission, barriers, and constraints: A dynamic model of the spread of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution42(3): 367-387.
16.
Kadera, K.M. n.d. Discriminate deterrence: Empirical evidence for outspending the Soviets. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
Kennedy, P.1991. Grand strategies in war and peace. London: Yale University Press.
18.
King, G., and L. Zeng.2000. Explaining rate events in international relations. International Organization53 (3): 693-715.
19.
Brian, L., and D.S. Morey.2006. The impact of regime type on the influence of US foreign aid. Foreign Policy Analysis2(4): 385-404.
20.
Lai, B., and D. Slater.2006. Institutions of the offensive: Domestic sources of dispute initiation in authoritarian regimes, 1950-1992. American Journal of Political Science50(1): 113-126.
21.
Lee, S.C., R.G. Muncaster, and D.A. Zinnes.1994. "The friend of my enemy is my enemy": Modeling triadic internation relationships. Synthese100: 333-358.
22.
Maoz, Z., and R. Siverson.2008Bargaining, domestic politics, and international context in the management of war: A review essay. Conflict Management and Peace Science25(2): 171-189.
23.
Mearsheimer, J.J.2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton.
24.
Mesterton-Gibbons, M.1989. A concrete approach to mathematical modelling. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
25.
Morey, D.2006. Shock-proof structures? A dynamic model of the construction, maintenance, and demolition of international rivalries. PhD Thesis. University of Iowa.
26.
Morgenthau, H.J.1978. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace , fifth ed. revised. New York: Knopf, Inc.
27.
Morton, R.B.1999. Methods and models: A guide to the empirical analysis of formal models in political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Organski, A.F.K., and J. Kugler.1977. The costs of major power wars: The phoenix factor. American Political Science Review71(4): 1347-1366.
29.
Organski, A.F.K., and J. Kugler.1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Overy, R.1995. Why the allies won. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
31.
Powell, R.2006. War as a commitment problem. International Organization60: 169-203.
32.
Richardson, L.F.1960. Arms and insecurity. Chicago: Homewood.
33.
Slatchev, B.2003. The power to hurt: Costly conflict with informed states . American Political Science Review97(1): 123-135.
Sullivan, P.L.2008. Sustaining the fight: A cross-sectional time-series analysis of public support for ongoing military interventions. Conflict Management and Peace Science (this issue).
36.
The princess bride.1987. Lion's Gate Studios.
37.
U.S. Senate, Foreign Relations and Armed Services Committees.1951. Hearings: The military situation in the Far East (82nd Congress).
