Most multivariate models aimed at evaluating the impact of democracy on interstate conflict contain a set of control variables sufficiently large to have a confusing impact. Partly for that reason, the potentially confounding impacts of such variables as wealth, political stability, and political similarity on the relationship of democracy to conflict have still not been evaluated in a definitive manner. In other cases, multivariate models contain intervening variables that are likely to produce misleading results. Multivariate analyses aimed specifically at uncovering spurious relationships in a more straightforward and incremental manner are better able to produce clear and informative results.
Barbieri, K.1996. Economic interdependence: A path to peace or a source of interstate conflict? Journal of Peace Research33(1): 29-49.
2.
Barbieri, K.2002. The liberal illusion: Does trade promote peace?Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Bennett, S.D., and A.C. Stam.2000. Research design and estimator choices in the analysis of interstate dyads: When decisions matter. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(5): 653-685.
4.
Bremer S. A.1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816- 1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36(2): 309-341.
5.
Bremer, S.A.1993. Democracy and militarized interstate conflict, 1816-1965 . International Interactions18(3): 231-249.
6.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., and D. Lalman.1992. War and reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Doyle, M.1986. Liberalism and world politics. American Political Science Review80(4): 1151-1170.
9.
Gartzke, E., and Q. Li.2003. Measure for measure: Concept operationalization and the trade interdependence-conflict debate. Journal of Peace Research40(5): 553-571.
10.
Gurr, T.R.1974. Persistence and change in political systems, 1800-1971 . American Political Science Review48(4): 1482-1504.
11.
Henderson, E.A.2002. Democracy and war: The end of an illusion?Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
12.
King, G., R.O. Keohane, and S. Verba.1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Leamer, E.E.1983. Let's take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review73(1): 31-43.
14.
Levine, R., and Renelt, D.1992. A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions . American Economic Review82(4): 942-963.
15.
Maoz, Z., and N. Abdolali.1989. Regime types and international conflict, 1816-1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution33(1): 3-35.
16.
Maoz, Z., and B. Russett.1992. Alliance, contiguity, wealth, and political stability: Is the lack of conflict among democracies a statistical artifact?International Interactions17(3): 245-267.
17.
Maoz, Z., and B. Russett.1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review87(3): 624-638.
18.
McAleer, M., A.R. Pagan, and P.A. Volker.1985. What will take the con out of econometrics ? American Economic Review75(3): 293-307.
19.
Mousseau, M.2000. Market prosperity, democratic consolidation, and democratic peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(4): 472-507.
20.
Oneal, J.R., F. Oneal, Z. Maoz, and B. Russett.1996. The liberal peace: Interdependence, democracy and international conflict. Journal of Peace Research33(1): 11-28.
21.
Oneal, J.R., and B. Russett.1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly41(2): 267-293.
22.
Oneal, J.R., and B. Russett.1999a. Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research36(4): 423-442.
23.
Oneal, J.R., and B. Russett.1999b. The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885-1992 . World Politics52(1): 1-37.
24.
Ray, J.L.1990. Friends as foes: International conflict and wars between formal allies. In Prisoners of War?, eds. C. S. Gochman and A. N. Sabrosky.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books .
25.
Ray, J.L.2003. Explaining interstate conflict and war: What should be controlled for? Conflict Management and Peace Science20(2): 1-31.
26.
Reed, W.2000. A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation . American Journal of Political Science44(1): 84-93.
27.
Rummel, R.J.1983. Libertarianism and international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution27(1): 27-71.
28.
Russett, B., and J.R. Oneal.2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.
29.
Russett, B., J.R. Oneal, and D.R. Davis.1998. The third leg of the Kantian tripod for peace: International organizations and militarized disputes, 1950-1985 . International Organization52(3): 441-467.
30.
Sala-I-Martin, X.1997. I just ran two million regressions. American Economic Review87(2): 178-183.
31.
Thompson, W.R.1988. On global war. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
