As a way of clarifying and evaluating competing claims made by writers on alliances and the balance of power, I extend recent work on the relation between bargaining and war to a three-state setting where coalitions are possible. I show that if what is commonly called “balancing” occurs at all, it is because it is seen as a way of reducing the risk associated with possible exogenous changes in the distribution of military capabilities. It is therefore not necessarily inconsistent with what is called “bandwagoning,” but can actually make bandwagoning more likely. Moreover, balancing need not occur for international systems to be stable.
Benson, B.V., and E.M.S. Niou.2000. Comprehending strategic ambiguity: US policy toward the Taiwan Strait security issue. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, Duke University.
2.
Blainey, G.1988. The causes of war. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press.
3.
von Clausewitz, C.1976. On War. (Originally published in 1832.) Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Fearon, J.D.1995a. Bargaining over objects that influence future bargaining power. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, the University of Chicago, August 21.
5.
Fearon, J.D.1995b. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49: 379-414.
6.
Fustel de Coulanges, N.D.1956. The ancient city: A study on the religion, laws, and institutions of Greece and Rome. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
7.
Greif, A.1998. Self-enforcing political systems and economic growth: Late medieval Genoa. In Analytic narratives, ed. Robert Bates et al. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Gulick, E.V.1955. Europe's classical balance of power. New York: Norton.
9.
Holsti, K.J.1991. Peace and war: Armed conflicts and international order 1648-1989. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Kant, I.1797. The metaphysics of morals. In Kant: Political writings, ed. Hans Reiss, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
McKay, D., and H.M. Scott.1983. The Rise of the Great Powers 1648-1815 . London and New York: Longman.
13.
McNeill, W.H.1982. The pursuit of power: Technology, armed force, and society . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
Muthoo, A.2000. A non-technical introduction to bargaining theory. World Economics1: 145-166.
15.
Niou, E.M.S., and P.C. Ordeshook.1990. Stability in anarchic international systems. American Political Science Review84: 1207-1234.
16.
Osborne, M.J., and A. Rubinstein.1990. Bargaining and markets. San Diego, CA , Academic Press.
17.
Powell, R.1996. Stability and the distribution of power. World Politics48: 239-267.
18.
Powell, R.1999. In the shadow of power: States and strategies in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Powell, R.2002. Bargaining theory and international conflict. Annual Review of Political Science5: 1-30.
20.
Powell, R.2003. The inefficient use of power: Costly conflict with complete information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
21.
Rashid, A.2000. Taliban: Militant Islam, oil, and fundamentalism in Central Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22.
Schroeder, Paul W.1994. The transformation of European politics 1763-1848. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
Schweller, R.L.1994. Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security19: 72-107.
24.
Schweller, R.L.1998. Deadly imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's strategy of world conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
Skaperdas, S.1998. On the formation of alliances in conflict and contests . Public Choice96: 25-42.
26.
Wagner, R.H.1986. The theory of games and the balance of power. World Politics38: 546-576.
27.
Wagner, R.H.1993. What was bipolarity?International Organization47:77-106.
28.
Wagner, R.H.2000. Bargaining and war. American Journal of Political Science44: 469-484.
29.
Waltz, K.N.1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
