Bueno de Mesquita, B., and F. N. Stokman. Eds. 1994. European community decision making. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Felsenthal, D.S., and A. Diskin.1982. The bargaining problem revisited: Minimum utility point, restricted monotonicity axiom, and the mean as an estimate of expected utility. Journal of Conflict Resolution26(4): 664-691.
3.
Kalai, E., and M. Smorodinsky.1975. Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem. Econometrica43(3): 513-518.
4.
McKelvey, R.1976. Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control, Journal of Economic Theory12: 472-482.
5.
Nash, J.F., Jr.1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica18(2): 155-162.
6.
Rubinstein, A.1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica50(1): 97-110.
7.
Putnam, R.1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games, International Organization42: 427-460.
8.
Riker, W.H.1996. The strategy of rhetoric. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Schofield, N.1978. Instability of simple dynamic games. Review of Economic Studies45: 575-594.
10.
Stokman, F. N., and R. Thomson. Eds. 2004. Winners and losers in the European Union. Special issue of European Union Politics, 5.