Samples from different sampling campaigns usually have distinct sampling lengths. All the available information should be incorporated when constructing a grade model. However, the variations in length among the samples must be considered during estimation. We propose to perform kriging using samples of different support. The kriging system is built using average covariances to account for the difference in support between the samples. The technique is applied in a mineral deposit. The resulting grade model is validated with visual inspection and swath plots. Cross validation was used to compare the proposed approach against kriging using point covariances, which disregards the difference in support between the data. Results show that the use of average covariances in the kriging system improved both the accuracy and the precision of the estimates.
BassaniM. A. A., MachadoP. L., CostaJ. F. C. L. and RubioR. J. H.2014. Using production data to improve grade estimation in underground mining.Applied Earth Science (Transactions of the Institute for Mineralogy and Metallurgy Section B), 122, (4), 243–248. doi: 10.1179/1743275814Y.0000000060
2.
BertoliO., VannJ. and DunhamS.2003. Two-dimensional geostatistical methods – theory, practice and a case study from the 1A shoot nickel deposit, Leinster, Western Australia, in Proceedings 5th International Mining Geology Conference, 189–195; Melbourne, The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
3.
CharifoG., AlmeidaJ. A. and FerreiraA.2013. Managing borehole samples of unequal lengths to construct a high-resolution mining model of mineral grades zoned by geological units.Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 132, 209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.07.006
4.
DeutschC. V.2006. A sequential indicator simulation program for categorical variables with point and block data: BlockSIS.Computers and Geosciences, 32, 1669–1681. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.03.005
5.
DeutschC. V. and JournelA. G.1998. GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user's guide; New York, Oxford University Press.
6.
DeutschC. V., SrinivasanS. and MoY.1996. Geostatistical reservoir modeling accounting for precision and scale of seismic data, in SPE Annual Technical Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 6–9 October 1996.
7.
GoovaertsP.1997. Geostatistics for natural resource evaluation; Oxford, Oxford University Press.
8.
GoovaertsP.2008. Kriging and semivariogram deconvolution in the presence of irregular geographical units.Mathematical Geosciences, 40, (1), 101–128. doi: 10.1007/s11004-007-9129-1
9.
HansenT. M. and MosegaardK.2008. Visim: sequential simulation for linear inverse problems.Computers and Geosciences, 34, (1), 53–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.02.003
10.
IsaaksH. E. and SrivastavaM. R.1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics; Oxford, Oxford University Press.
11.
JournelA. G.1986. Geostatistics: models and tools for the earth sciences.Mathematical Geology, 18, 119–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00897658
12.
JournelA. G. and HuijbregtsC. J.1978. Mining geostatistics; New York, Academic Press.
13.
KrigeD. G.1978. Lognormal – de Wijsian geostatistics for ore evaluation; Johannesburg, South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Monograph Series.
14.
KyriakidisP.2004. A geostatistical framework for area-to-point spatial interpolation.Geographical Analysis, 36, 259–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2004.tb01135.x
15.
LiuY. and JournelA. G.2009. A package for geostatistical integration of coarse and fine scale data.Computers and Geosciences, 35, (3), 527–547. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.015
16.
MarquesD. M., HundelshaussenR. R. and CostaJ. F. C.2014. The effect of accumulation in 2D estimates in phosphatic ore.Revista Escola de Minas, 67, (4), 431–437. doi: 10.1590/0370-44672014670179
17.
Pardo-IgúzquizaE., Chica-OlmoM. and AtkinsonP. M.2006. Downscaling cokriging for image sharpening.Remote Sensing of Environment, 102, (1–2), 86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.014
18.
PoggioL. and GimonaA.2013. Modelling high resolution RS data with the aid of coarse resolution data and ancillary data.International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 23, 360–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.10.010
19.
RenW., CunhaL. B. and DeutschC. V.2005. An exact downscaling methodology in presence of heterogeneity: application to the Athabasca oil sands, in Proceedings of the International Thermal Operations of Heavy Oil Symposium, Alberta, Canada, SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers) paper #97874.
20.
TranT. T., DeutschC. V. and XieY.2001. Direct geostatistical simulation with multiscale well, seismic, and production data, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–3 October 2001.
21.
YaoT. and JournelA. G.2000. Integrating seismic attribute maps and well logs for porosity modeling in a west Texas carbonate reservoir: addressing the scale and precision problem.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 28, (12), 65–79. doi: 10.1016/S0920-4105(00)00068-1
