For Archimedes’ work to have furnished the ‘key theoretical tools’ for the scientific revolution, the texts must have been comprehensible to early modern readers. Yet as Archimedes’ readers and commentators have observed for centuries, his work can be very difficult going indeed. In this chapter, I explore how commentaries and other explanatory texts, like Guidobaldo dal Monte's 1588 ‘paraphrase’ commentary to Archimedes’ Planes in Equilibrium, can help unfurl the difficulties of Archimedes’ sparse proofs by means of additional explanations and examples that help the reader develop their own ability to follow Archimedes’ reasoning. I give particular attention to insights from contemporary cognitive science into how strategic repetition of information, the materiality of the text, and highlighting connections between mathematics and the material world can all aid in the learning process.
Archimedes. 1970a. “
De lineis spiralibus. ” In Archimède , edited by MuglerC., 8–74. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
2.
Archimedes. 1970b. “
De sphaera et cylindro. ” In Archimède , edited by MuglerC., 8–131. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
3.
Archimedes. 1970c. “
Quadratura parabolae. ” In Archimède , edited by MuglerC., 164–195. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
4.
Archimedes. 2017. The Works of Archimedes . Vol. 2:
On Spirals. Edited by R. Netz.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Archimedes and Eutocius. 2004. The Works of Archimedes: Translated into English, Together with Eutocius’ Commentaries, with Commentary and Critical Edition of the Diagrams . Vol. 1:
On the Sphere and Cylinder. Edited by R. Netz.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
AsperM.2013. “Explanation Between Nature and Text: Ancient Greek Commentators on Science. ” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1): 43–50.
7.
AsperM.2019. “Personae at Play. ‘Men of Mathematics’ in Commentary. ” Historia Mathematica 47: 4–15.
8.
BaldiB.1707. Cronica de matematici, overo epitome dell'istoria delle vite loro . Urbino.
9.
BaldiB.1887. Vite Inedite Di Matematici Italiani . Edited by E. Narducci.
Roma: Tip. delle scienze matematiche e fisiche.
10.
BerreyM.2017. Hellenistic Science at Court . Berlin: De Gruyter.
11.
Bertoloni MeliD.1992. “Guidobaldo Dal Monte and the Archimedean Revival. ” Nuncius 7 (1): 3–34.
12.
Bertoloni MeliD.2006. Thinking with Objects: The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
BrentjesS.1998. “
Additions to Book I in the Arabic Traditions of Euclid's Elements. ” Studies in History of Medicine and Science 15: 55–117.
14.
BrentjesS.2019. “Mathematical Commentaries in Arabic and Persian – Purposes, Forms, and Styles. ” Historia Mathematica 47: 54–66.
15.
CamerotaF.2003. “Two New Attributions: A Refractive Dial of Guidobaldo Del Monte and the Roverino Compass of Fabrizio Mordente. ” Nuncius 18 (1): 25–38.
16.
ChemlaK.1999. “Commentaires, éditions et autres textes seconds: quel enjeu pour l'histoire des mathématiques ? Réflexions inspirées par la note de Reviel Netz. ” Revue d'histoire des mathématiques 5 (1): 127–148.
17.
ChristiansonK., Mestre JoseP., and Luke StevenG.2012. “Practice Makes (Nearly) Perfect: Solving ‘Students-and-Professors’-Type Algebra Word Problems. ” Applied Cognitive Psychology 26 (5): 810–822.
18.
ClarkA.2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
ClarkA., and ChalmersD.. 1998. “The Extended Mind. ” Analysis 58 (1): 7–19.
20.
Dal MonteGuidobaldo.1577. Guidi Ubaldi e Marchionibus Montis Mechanicorum Liber . Pisauri: Apud Hieronymum Concordiam.
21.
Dal MonteGuidobaldo.1588. Guidi Ubaldi e Marchionibus Montis in duos Archimedis aequeponderantium libros paraphrasis scholiis illustrata . Pisauri: Apud Hieronymum Concordiam.
22.
Dal MonteGuidobaldo.1609. Guidi Ubaldi e Marchionibus Montis Problematum Astronomicorum Libri Septem . Venetiis: Aput Bernardum Iuntam, Io. Baptistam Ciottum, et Socios.
23.
DavisR. B.1984. Learning Mathematics: The Cognitive Science Approach to Mathematics Education . Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.
24.
De GrootA. D.1996. Perception and Memory in Chess: Studies in the Heuristics of the Professional Eye . Assen: Van Gorcum.
25.
De YoungG.2019. “The Commentator's Craft: Building a Mathematical Commentary from Quotations. ” Historia Mathematica 47: 67–86.
26.
Decorps-FoulquierM.1998. “
Eutocius d'Ascalon, éditeur du traité des Coniques d'Apollonios de Pergé et l'exigence de ‘clarté’: un exemple des pratiques exégétiques et critiques des héritiers de la science alexandrine. ” In Sciences exactes et sciences appliquées à Alexandrie , edited by ArgoudG. and GuillauminJ.-Y., 87–101. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l'Université de Saint-Etienne.
27.
DijksterhuisE. J.1987. Archimedes . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Diophantus. 1893. “
Arithmetica. ” In Diophanti Alexandrini opera omnia , vol.
1. edited by TanneryP., 2-448. Leipzig: Teubner.
29.
DrakeS., and DrabkinI. E.. 1969. Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy: Selections from Tartaglia, Benedetti, Guido Ubaldo, & Galileo . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
30.
DuffeeL. A.2021. “The Instructive Function of Mathematical Proof: A Case Study of the Analysis Cum Synthesis Method in Apollonius of Perga's Conics. ” Axiomathes 31 (5): 601–617.
31.
EpelboimJ., and SuppesP.. 2001. “A Model of Eye Movements and Visual Working Memory During Problem Solving in Geometry. ” Vision Research 41 (12): 1561–1574.
32.
Eutocius. 1915a. “
Commentarii in libros de sphaera et cylindro. ” In Archimedis opera omnia cum commentariis Eutocii , vol.
3, edited by HeibergJ. L. and StamatisE., 2–224. Leipzig: Teubner.
33.
Eutocius. 1915b. “
Commentarius in libros de planorum aequilibriis. ” In Archimedis opera omnia cum commentariis Eutocii , vol.
3, edited by HeibergJ. L. and StamatisE., 264–318. Leipzig: Teubner.
34.
FauconnierG.1997. Mappings in Thought and Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
FauconnierG., and TurnerM.. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities . New York: Basic Books.
36.
FerrariV., DidierjeanA., and MarmecheE.. 2008. “Effect of Expertise Acquisition on Strategic Perception: The Example of Chess. ” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (8): 1265–1280.
37.
FournarakisP., and ChristianidisJ.. 2010. “
On Archimedes’ Pursuit Concerning Geometrical Analysis. ” In The Genius of Archimedes – 23 Centuries of Influence on Mathematics, Science and Engineering History of Mechanism and Machine Science , edited by PaipetisS. A. and CeccarelliM., 69–81. Dordrecht: Springer.
38.
FrankM.2012. “Guidobaldo dal Monte's Mechanics in Context.” PhD thesis, Pisa University.
39.
FrankM.2013. “Mathematics, Technics, and Courtly Life in Late Renaissance Urbino. ” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 67 (3): 305–330.
40.
GalileiG.1847. Le Opere Di Galileo Galilei . Firenze: Società Editrice Fiorentina.
41.
GalileiG.1859. Commercio Epistolare Di Galileo Galilei . Firenze: Società Editrice Fiorentina. pp. 7. v., [8] leaves of plates (7 folded).
42.
GambaE.1994. “Documenti Di Muzio Oddi per La Storia Del Compasso Di Riduzione E Di Proporzione. ” Physis 31 (3): 799–815.
43.
GambaE., and MontebelliV.. 1988. Le scienze a Urbino nel tardo Rinascimento . Urbino: QuattroVenti.
44.
Henninger-VossM.2000. “Working Machines and Noble Mechanics: Guidobaldo Del Monte and the Translation of Knowledge. ” Isis 91 (2): 233–259.
45.
HutchinsE.2005. “Material Anchors for Conceptual Blends. ” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (10): 1555–1577.
46.
JaegerM.2008. Archimedes and the Roman Imagination . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
47.
KnorrW. R.1978. “Archimedes and the Spirals: The Heuristic Background. ” Historia Mathematica 5 (1): 43–75.
48.
LeventhalM.2017. “Eratosthenes’ Letter to Ptolemy: The Literary Mechanics of Empire. ” American Journal of Philology 138 (1): 43–84.
49.
MarrA.2011. Between Raphael and Galileo: Mutio Oddi and the Mathematical Culture of Late Renaissance Italy . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Mejia-RamosJ. P., and WeberK.. 2014. “Why and How Mathematicians Read Proofs: Further Evidence from a Survey Study. ” Educational Studies in Mathematics 85 (2): 161–173.
51.
NetzR.1998. “Deuteronomic Texts: Late Antiquity and the History of Mathematics. ” Revue D'histoire Des Mathématiques 4 (2): 261–288.
52.
NetzR.1999. “Archimedes Transformed: The Case of a Result Stating a Maximum for a Cubic Equation. ” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 54 (1): 1–47.
53.
NetzR.2002. “
Greek Mathematicians: A Group Picture. ” In Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture , edited by TuplinC. and RihllT. E., 196–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
NetzR.2009. Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic . New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
OtteM., and PanzaMarco. 1997. Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics: History and Philosophy . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
56.
Pappus.
Synagōgē , In Pappi Alexandrini collectionis quae supersunt , 3
vols., edited by HultschF.. Berlin: Weidmann, 1:1876; 2:1877; 3:1878: 1:2-470; 2:474-1020; 3:1022-1134.
57.
Pappus. 1986. Book 7 of the Collection . Edited by A. Jones.
New York: Springer-Verlag.
58.
PigafettaFilippo.1581. Le mechaniche dell’ illustrissimo signore Guido Ubaldo de’ Marchesi del Monte . Venetia: Francesco di Franceschi Sanese.
59.
RennJ., and DamerowP.. 2012. The Equilibrium Controversy: Guidobaldo Del Monte's Critical Notes on the Mechanics of Jordanus and Benedetti and Their Historical and Conceptual Backgrounds. Edition Open Access.
60.
RennJ., and DamerowP.. 2017. Guidobaldo Del Monte's Mechanicorum Liber. Edition Open Access.
61.
RoseP. L.1968. “The Origins of the Proportional Compass from Mordente to Galileo. ” Physis 10 (1): 53–69.
62.
RoseP. L.1975. The Italian Renaissance of Mathematics: Studies on Humanists and Mathematicians from Petrarch to Galileo . Genève: Librairie Droz.
63.
SheaW. R.2013. “
Guidobaldo del Monte: Galileo's Patron, Mentor and Friend. ” In Guidobaldo del Monte (1545–1607): Theory and Practice of the Mathematical Disciplines from Urbino to Europe MPRL – Proceedings , edited by A. Becchi, D. Bertoloni Meli, and E. Gamba, 95–104.
Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften.
64.
SuttonJ.2007. “Batting, Habit and Memory: The Embodied Mind and the Nature of Skill. ” Sport in Society 10 (5): 763–786.
65.
TaubL. C.2008. “
Eratosthenes Sends Greetings to King Ptolemy. ” In Mathematics Celestial and Terrestrial: Festschrift für Menso Folkerts zum 65. Geburtstag , edited by DaubenJ. W., 285–302. Halle (Saale): Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina; Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.
66.
ThurstonW. P.1995. “On Proof and Progress in Mathematics. ” For the Learning of Mathematics 15 (1): 29–37.
67.
van DyckM.2013. “
‘Argumentandi modus huius scientiae maxime proprius.’ Guidobaldo's Mechanics and the Question of Mathematical Principles. ” In Guidobaldo del Monte (1545–1607): Theory and Practice of the Mathematical Disciplines from Urbino to Europe MPRL – Proceedings , edited by BecchiA., MeliD. B., and GambaE., 9–34. Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften.
68.
WeberK., and Mejia-RamosJ. P.. 2011. “Why and How Mathematicians Read Proofs: An Exploratory Study. ” Educational Studies in Mathematics 76 (3): 329–344.
69.
WolfeJ.2004. Humanism, Machinery, and Renaissance Literature . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
