From brainwaves and ripples to Helen of Troy and Orlan: the depiction and significance of salience

Abstract

The averaging of waveforms necessary to detect small cortical evoked potentials which was pioneered by George Dawson, and the periodicity of component waves resulting from interference identified by Thomas Young, reveal selected components of the visual record to be diminished and others to be enhanced and thus salient. Surprisingly, these examples of achieving salience in neurophysiology and physics were anticipated two millennia ago by the Greek artist Zeuxis. When commissioned to paint a portrait of Helen of Troy, Zeuxis used a not dissimilar method of selection which still resonates today in the carnal artistry of Orlan. These examples reveal the important contribution of graphic methods to the depiction and hence the significance of salience in both the sciences and the humanities.

Keywords

Averaging interference portraiture salience Zeuxis Orlan Dawson Young

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cicero . 1949. De Inventione [On Invention], Book II, 1-3. Translated by H. M. Hubbell. Loeb Classical Library 386, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dawson

1951. “A Summation Technique for Detecting Small Signals in a Large Irregular Background. ” Journal of Physiology 115: 2P-3P.

Dawson

1954. “A Summation Technique for the Detection of Small Evoked Potentials. ” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 6: 65–84.

Mansfield

2007. Too Beautiful to Picture: Zeuxis, Myth, and Mimesis . Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

Merton

P. A.

, and Morton

H. B.

. 1984. “George Dawson (1912-1983) and the Invention of Averaging Techniques in Physiology. ” Trends in Neurosciences 7: 371–374.

Mollon

J. D.

2002. “The Origins of the Concept of Interference. ” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 360: 807–819.

O'Bryan

1997. “Saint Orlan Faces Reincarnation. ” Art Journal 56: 50–56.

Panofsky

1955. “ The History of the Theory of Human Proportions as a Reflection of the History of Styles. ” In Meaning in the Visual Arts. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, p. 56.

Pliny the Elder . 1952. Natural History, Book XXXIV; 55. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge MA; London: Harvard University Press.

10.

Regan

2009. “Some Early Uses of Evoked Brain Responses in Investigations of Human Visual Function. ” Vision Research 49: 882–897.

11.

Tobin

1975. “The Canon of Polykleitos. ” American Journal of Archaeology 79: 307–321.

12.

Young

1804. Reply to the Animadversions of the Edinburgh Reviewers, on Some Papers, Published in the Philosophical Transactions . London: Longman and others, 17–18.

13.

Young

1807. A Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts, vol. 1 . London: Joseph Johnson.