In the 1970s, Brazil sought to establish State policies aimed at technological autonomy in the field of Informatics, resulting in the origin of a national industry of computers. This paper will explore another measure that has been little explored by historiography: the control over imports of data processing equipment. Our research intends to show the control exerted by the Commission for Coordination of Electronic Processing Activities (CAPRE) and to discuss how its technicians performed the analysis of user requests, resulting in decisions that either allowed or not the installation of the requested systems. When analysing computer purchase contracts and evaluating the intended uses for the imported systems, they defined the ‘merit’ of each order and sought to raise users’ awareness on the problem of technological dependence. They reveal different discourses on the technological modernization (‘efficient/lowercost’ imported technologies versus ‘self–determination/autonomy’ views influencing society's perceptions on Informatics in the country.
AdlerE.1987. The Power of Ideology: the Quest for Technological Autonomy in Argentina and Brazil . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
BaerW.2002. A economia brasileira . São Paulo: Nobel.
3.
BeckS.2012. Computer Bargain in Mexico and Brazil 1970-1990: Dynamic Interplay of Industry and Politics . London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
4.
BortoliniE.2015. A indústria eletrônica do Rio Grande do Sul: mapeamento da rota tecnológica, interação universidade-empresa, inovação e desenvolvimento econômico (1960-1990) . Porto Alegre: PUCRS.
5.
Brazil. 1974. II Plano Nacional de Desenvolvimento . Brasília: SEPLAN.
6.
CardosoM.2013. SOX: um UNIX-compatível brasileiro a serviço do discurso de autonomia tecnológica na década de 1980 . Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.
7.
CodatoA.1995. Estrutura política e interesse de classe: uma análise do sistema estatal no Brasil pós-1964 – o caso do Conselho de Desenvolvimento Econômico . Campinas: Unicamp.
8.
DantasV.1998. Guerrilha tecnológica – a verdadeira história da Política Nacional de Informática . Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
9.
EdwardsP.1996. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
EliasN.1995. “Technization and Civilization. ” Theory, Culture & Society 12 (3): 7–42.
11.
EvansP.1979. Dependent Development: the Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
EvansP.1986. “Informática, a Metamorfose da Dependência. ” Novos Estudos CEBRAP 15: 14–31.
13.
EvansP.1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
EvansP., TigreP., and FrischtakC.. 1992. High Technology and Third World Industrialization: Brazilian Computer Policy in Comparative Perspective . Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
FioriJ.1994. “O Nó Cego do Desenvolvimento Brasileiro. ” Novos Estudos CEBRAP 40: 125–144.
16.
FlammK.1987. Creating the Computer: Government, Industry and High Technology . Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
17.
GrahamS., and ThriftN.. 2007. “Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance. ” Theory, Culture & Society 24 (3): 1–25.
18.
HechtG.2001. “
Technology, Politics, and National Identity in France. ” In Technologies of Power - Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes , edited by HechtG., and AllenM., 253–293. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
IBI. 1976. National Planning for Informatics in Developing Countries . Amsterdan: North Holland Publishing.
20.
LuzioE.1996. The Microcomputer Industry in Brazil: the Case of Protected High-Technology Industry . Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
21.
MarquesI.2015. “Brazil's Computer Market Reserve: Democracy, Authoritarianism and Ruptures. ” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 23 (4): 64–75.
22.
MathiasS.2004. A militarização da burocracia: a participação militar na administração das Comunicações e da Educação, 1963-1990 . São Paulo: Unesp.
23.
MedinaE.2011. Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Technology and Politics in Allende's Chile . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
MedinaE., MarquesI., and HolmesC.. 2014. Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology and Society in Latin America . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
MottaR. P.2014. As Universidades e o Regime Militar . Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar Editor.
26.
PedersenJ.1994. “
Administering Electronics: the Experience of India and Brazil. ” In Latin American Development and Public Policy , edited by NagelS., 91–121. London: Palgrave Macmilian.
27.
SchneiderB.1991. Politics within the State: Elite Bureaucrats and Industrial Policy in Authoritarian Brazil . Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
28.
SchoonmakerS.2002. High-tech Trade Wars: U.S.-Brazilian Conflicts in the Global Economy . Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
29.
SewardJ.2016. The Politics of Capitalism Transformation: Brazilian Informatics Policy, Regime Change and State Autonomy . New York: Routledge.
30.
TapiaJ.1995. A trajetória da Política de Informática Brasileira . Campinas: Papirus.
31.
TigreP.1984. Computadores Brasileiros: Indústria, tecnologia e dependência . Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
32.
ValenteC.2017. “Computadores e Educação: momentos iniciais desta relação no Brasil. ” Revista Brasileira de Sistema de Informação 10 (2): 193–219.
33.
Van RyckeghemD.1992. “Information Technologies in Brazil: Hope of the Third World?
” Telematics and Informatics 9 (1): 43–51.
34.
ViannaM.2016. Entre burocratas e especialistas: a formação e o controle do campo da informática no Brasil (1958-1979) . Porto Alegre: PUCRS.
