This article reflects on issues arising from attempts to treat behaviour as an object of scientific and social scientific study. It examines what happens when behaviour is taken as a thing, an object of concern, modification and enquiry. At the heart of the notion of behaviour, this article argues, lies a fundamental ambiguity. The concept's power, but also its elusiveness, lies in its ability to tack back and forth between two visions: on the one hand behaviour as materialized, objectified action, regular, repetitive and rule-bound, and on the other behaviour as a placeholder, a word to index something we do not yet know or understand. Those are two ways of being a ‘thing’.
ArdenerEdwin.1989. The Voice of Prophecy and Other Essays. Edited by M. Chapman. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
BennettT., DodsworthF., NobleG., PooveyM., and WatkinsM.. 2013. “Habit and Habituation: Governance and the Social.” Body & Society19 (2–3): 3–29. doi: 10.1177/1357034X13485881
4.
Bird-DavidN.1999. ““Animism” Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology [and Comments and Reply].” Current Anthropology40: S67–S91. doi: 10.1086/200061
5.
BourdieuPierre.1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BuchananBrett.2008. Onto-Ethologies: The Animal Environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. Albany: SUNY Press.
7.
BurianR. M.1993. “How the Choice of Experimental Organism Matters: Epistemological Reflections on an Aspect of Biological Practice.” Journal of the History of Biology26: 351–367. doi: 10.1007/BF01061974
8.
BurkhardtRichard W.2005. Patterns of Behavior: Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, and the Founding of Ethology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
CandeaM.2010. “‘I Fell in Love with Carlos the Meerkat’: Engagement and Detachment in Human-animal Relations.” American Ethnologist37: 241–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01253.x
10.
CandeaM.2012. “Different Species, One Theory: Reflections on Anthropomorphism and Anthropological Comparison.” Cambridge Anthropology30: 118–135.
11.
CandeaM.2013a. “Habituating Meerkats and Redescribing Animal Behaviour Science.” Theory Culture & Society30: 105–128. doi: 10.1177/0263276413501204
12.
CandeaM.2013b. “Suspending Belief: Epoche in Animal Behavior Science.” American Anthropologist115: 423–436. doi: 10.1111/aman.12026
13.
CandeaM., and Alcayna-StevensL.. 2012. “Internal Others: Ethnographies of Naturalism.” Cambridge Anthropology30: 36–47.
14.
CarrithersMichael, CollinsSteven, and LukesSteven, eds. 1985. The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CristEileen.1999. Images of Animals: Anthropomorphism and Animal Mind. Vol. Animals, Culture, and Society. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
16.
DastonL.2011. Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
DastonL., and GalisonP.. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books Distributed by the MIT Press.
18.
DescolaP.2005. Par Delà Nature et Culture. Paris: Gallimard.
19.
DesrosièresAlain.1998. The Politics of Large Numbers A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
DurkheimEmile.1897. Le Suicide; Étude de Sociologie. Vol. Bibliothèque de Philosophie Contemporaine. Paris: F. Alcan.
21.
DurkheimEmile.1988. Les Règles de La Methode Sociologique. Paris: Champs Flammarion.
22.
FoucaultMichel.1988. ““Technologies of the Self.” In Technologies of the Self. A Seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by MartinL. H., 16–49. London: Tavistock.
23.
GonzálezRoberto J.2001. Zapotec Science: Farming and Food in the Northern Sierra of Oaxaca. Austin: University of Texas Press.
24.
GraeberDavid.2015. “Radical Alterity Is Just Another Way of Saying ‘Reality’: A Reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory5 (2): 1–41. doi: 10.14318/hau5.2.003
25.
HarawayD. J.2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
HolbraadM., and PedersenM. A.. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
KirkseyE., and HelmreichS.. 2010. “The Emergeance of Multispecies Ethnography.” Cultural Anthropology25: 545–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x
28.
KohlerR. E.1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
LatourB.2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
LevitisDaniel A., LidickerWilliam Z., and FreundGlenn. 2009. “Behavioural Biologists Do Not Agree on What Constitutes Behaviour.” Animal Behaviour78 (1): 103–110. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.018.
31.
LorenzK.1950. “The Comparative Model in Studying Innate Behaviour Patterns.” Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology4: 221–268.
32.
LöwyI.1992. “The Strength of Loose Concepts – Boundary Concepts, Federative Experimental Strategies and Disciplinary Growth: The Case of Immunology.” History of Science30: 371–396. doi: 10.1177/007327539203000402
33.
MontebelloPierre.2003. L'Autre Métaphysique: Essai Sur Ravaisson, Tarde, Nietzsche et Bergson. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
34.
MorrisDesmond.1980. Animal Days. New York: W. Morrow.
35.
MurrayD. W.1993. “What is the Western Concept of the Self? On Forgetting David Hume.” Ethos21: 3–23. doi: 10.1525/eth.1993.21.1.02a00010
36.
SahlinsM. D.1976. The use and Abuse of Biology: An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
SchutzAlfred.1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
38.
SegerstråleU. C. O.2000. Defenders of the Truth: the Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
StarS. L., and GriesemerJ. R.. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science19: 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
40.
StrathernMarilyn.1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. London: University of California Press.
41.
StrathernMarilyn.2018. “Persons and Partible Persons.” In Schools and Styles of Anthropological Theory, edited by CandeaMatei, 236–246. London: Routledge.
42.
StrumS. C., and FediganL. M., eds. 2000. Primate Encounters: Models of Science, Gender, and Society. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
ThalerRichard H, and SunsteinCass R. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
TinbergenN.2005. “On Aims and Methods of Ethology (Reprinted From Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie, Vol 20, Pg 410, 1963).” Animal Biology55 (4): 297–321. doi: 10.1163/157075605774840941
45.
Von UexküllJakob.1992. “A Stroll Through the Worlds of Animals and Men: A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds.” Semiotica89 (4): 319–391.
46.
WhiteM.2005. “The Liberal Character of Ethological Governance.” Economy and Society34 (3): 474–494. doi: 10.1080/03085140500111964
47.
WilsonE.1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
