This article revisits the historiography of Cubism and mathematics, with a particular focus on Pablo Picasso's uses of geometry at the end of the first decade of the twentieth century. In particular, I consider the artistic appropriation of the concept of the fourth dimension, and its pictorial uses as a conduit for a conceptual reformulation of pictorial space. I investigate Picasso's distinctive adoption of this geometric framework in relation to one of his 1909 experiments across painting and photography, and advocate the possibility of drawing novel historiographical lessons from Picasso's work — lessons that bring the historiography of Cubism in a closer dialogue with recent debates in the historiography of science. I conclude with an appeal to consider the continued relevance of this past experiment in art and science when assessing the contemporary drive toward art-science collaborations, and use the case of Cubism and the fourth dimension as a springboard for a critical reflection on the future directions of art-science collaborations.
AmbrosioChiara. 2014. Objectivity and representative practices across artistic and scientific representation. In Visualisation in the age of computerisation, eds. CarusiA., HoelA. S., WebmoorT. and WoolgarS., 118–144. London: Routledge.
2.
AntliffMark, and LeightenPatricia. 2008. A cubism reader, documents and criticism, 1906–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
ApollinaireGuillaume. 2004 [1913]. The cubist painters. Transl. Peter Reid. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
4.
BaldassariAnne. 1994. Picasso photographie: 1901–1916. Paris: Éditions de la Réunion de Musées Nationaux.
5.
BaldassariAnne. 1997. Picasso and photography: the dark mirror. Paris: Flammarion.
6.
BarrAlfred. 1943. What is modern painting? New York: Museum of Modern Art.
7.
BarryAndrew, and BornGeorgina, eds. 2013a. Art-science:from public understanding to public experiment. In Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations from the natural and social sciences, 247–272. London: Routledge.
8.
BarryAndrew, and BornGeorgina, eds. 2013b. Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations from the natural and social sciences (Editors’ Introduction). In Interdisciplinarity: reconfigurations from the natural and social sciences, 1–56. London: Routledge.
9.
BrainRobert M.2002. Representation on the line: the graphic method and the instruments of scientific modernism. In From energy to information: representation in science, art, and literature, eds. ClarkB. and HendersonL. D., 155–178. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
10.
BrainRobert M.2008. The pulse of modernism: experimental physiology and aesthetic avant-garde circa 1900. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science39: 393–417. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.06.011
11.
BrainRobert M.2015. The pulse of modernism: physiological aesthetics in fin de siécle Europe. Washington: University of Washington Press.
12.
ClarkT. J.2013. Picasso and truth: from cubism to guernica. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13.
ClarkBruce, and HendersonLinda D., eds. 2002. From energy to information: representation in science, art, and literature. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14.
ColominaBeatriz. 2009. Unclear vision: architecture of surveillance. In Engineering transparency: the technical, visual and spatial effects of glass, ed. BellM. and KimJ., 78–87. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
15.
FryEdward F., ed. 1966. Cubism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
FryEdward F.1981. Review of Pierre Daix and Joan Rosselet, Picasso: the cubist years 1907–1916 (Boston: New York Graphic Society, 1979), Art Journal, Spring issue, p. 93.
17.
FryEdward F.1983. Picasso, photography and cubism. Art Bulletin65: 145–146. doi: 10.1080/00043079.1983.10788055
18.
GalisonP.2003. Einstein's clocks and poincaré's maps. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
19.
GalisonP., HoltonG., and SchweberS., eds. 2008. Einstein for the 21st century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
GamwellLynn. 1980. Cubist criticism. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.
21.
GideonSigfried. 1941. Space, time and architecture: the growth of a new tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
GleizesAlbert, and MetzingerJean. 1912. Cubism. In Cubism, ed. FryE. F., 105–111. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
GoldingJohn. 1959. Cubism: a history and analysis 1907–1914. London: Faber and Faber.
24.
GreenChristopher. 2000. Art in France 1900–1940. New Haven: Yale University Press.
25.
GreenChristopher. 2001. Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GreenChristopher. 2005. Picasso, architecture and vertigo. New Haven: Yale University Press.
27.
HeathThomas L.1908. The thirteen books of euclid's elements. Translated from the text of Heidelberg with commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HendersonLinda D.1988. X-rays and the quest for invisible reality in the art of Kupka, Duchamp and the Cubists. Art Journal47: 323–340. doi: 10.1080/00043249.1988.10792429
29.
HendersonLinda D.2008. Einstein and 20th-century art: a romance in many dimensions. In Einstein for the 21st century, eds. GalisonP., HoltonG. and SchweberS., 101–129. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
HendersonLinda D.2013. Non-euclidean geometry and the fourth dimension in modern art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
HintonCharles H.1888. A new era of thought. London: S. Sonnenschein & Co.
32.
HoltonGerald. 1996. Einstein, history and other passions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
JouffretEsprit P.1903. Traité Élémentaire de Géométrie á Quatre Dimensions. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
34.
KernStephen. 2003 [1983]. The culture of time and space 1880–1914. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
LaportePaul. 1949. Cubism and science. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism7: 243–256. doi: 10.2307/426665
36.
MetzingerJean. 1910. Note sur la Peinture Pan, Oct.–Nov., 649–652. Translated in Fry 1966.
37.
MillerArthur I.2001. Einstein, Picasso: space, time and the beauty that causes havoc. New York: Basic Books.
38.
OlivierFernande. 2001. Loving Picasso: the private journal of fernande olivier. Transl. by Christine Baker and Michael Raeburn, foreword and notes by Marilyn McCully; epilogue by John Richardson. New York: Henry Abrahams Inc.
39.
ParkinsonGavin. 2008. Surrealism, art and modern science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
40.
PhilippiSimone, and KeyeserUte, eds. 1997. Camera works: the complete illustrations. London: Taschen.
41.
PoincaréHenri. [1895] 1946. The foundations of science/science and hypothesis/the value of science/science and method. Authorized translation by George Bruce Halsted. London: Science Press.
42.
RanciéreJacques. 2013. Dissensus. On politics and aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing.
43.
RichardsonJohn. 1996. A life of Picasso, vol. II: 1907–1917. London: Random House.
44.
RobbinTony. 2006. Shadows of reality: the fourth dimension in relativity, cubism and modern thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.
45.
RubinWilliam. 1989. Picasso and Braque: pioneering cubism. Boston, MA: Museum of Modern Art. Bulfinch Press/Little Brown &Co. (new edition 1993).
46.
SalmonAndré. 1955. Souvenirs Sans Fin, Première Époque (1903–1908). Paris: Gallimard.
47.
SalmonAndré. 1910. Courier Des Ateliers. Paris Journal, 4
48.
SteingartAlma. 2014. A four-dimensional cinema: computer graphics, higher dimensions and the geometrical imagination. In Visualisation in the age of computerisation, eds. CarusiA., HoelA. S., WebmoorT. and WoolgarS., 170–193. London: Routledge.
49.
TuckerPaul Hayes. 1982. Picasso, photography and the development of cubism. The Art Bulletin64: 288–299. doi: 10.1080/00043079.1982.10787974
