The productivity of the blast furnace Ironmaking process is significantly dependent on the slag chemistry. The presence of compounds like Al2O3 in high quantities can make the hearth slag highly viscous and difficult to tap. The objective of part-1 of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the role of high alumina (Al2O3 > 15%) compositions in the blast furnace slags. Slag viscosity, liquidus temperature, activation energy, etc., are critically reviewed with respective solutions to operate under the desired conditions. Flow parameters of the slag are examined to understand the melting-softening phenomena which directly affect the slag tap-to-tap time. The addition of certain additives to the slag system has also been studied with the aim to improve the target properties of the slag. A range of slag compositions and their optimization techniques are discussed in this part to provide greater insight into the topic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhmedH.New trends in the application of carbon-bearing materials in blast furnace iron-making. Minerals. 2018;8(12):561.
2.
MousaE.Modern blast furnace ironmaking technology: potentials to meet the demand of high hot metal production and lower energy consumption. Metall Mater Eng. 2019;25(2):69–104.
SrivastavaSChikhaleM. Challenges of Indian iron ore industry – geology, mining and processing perspective, p. 812–827. In: 43°.
5.
SadarangJNayakRKPanigrahiI.Challenges and future prospective of alternative materials to silica sand for green sand mould casting: a review. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2021;74(12):2939–2952.
6.
SmithMP.Blast furnace ironmaking–a view on future developments. Procedia Eng. 2017;174:19–28.
7.
MukherjeeKPrakashS.On dependence of high temperature rheological behaviour of blast furnace slag on its network structure. IFAC Proc Vol. 2013;46(16):312–320.
8.
RachappaSPrakashY.Iron ore recovery from low grade by using advance methods. Proc Earth Planet Sci. 2015;11:195–197.
9.
DuffyJAIngramMDSommervilleID.Acid–base properties of molten oxides and metallurgical slags. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1: Phys Chem Condens Phases. 1978;74:1410–1419.
10.
MinDJTsukihashiF.Recent advances in understanding physical properties of metallurgical slags. Met Mater Int. 2017;23(1):1–19.
11.
IvanovOSavovLJankeD.Alkali capacity and physical properties of blast furnace type slags. Steel Res Int. 2004;75(7):433–441.
12.
SiddiqueRCachimP.Waste and supplementary cementitious materials in concrete: characterisation, properties and applications. Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing; 2018.
13.
NishiokaKFujiwaraDOhnoKIet al.Modeling of dripping behavior in particles packed bed filled with immiscible fluid. ISIJ Int. 2010;50(7):1016–1022.
14.
SunaharaKNakanoKHoshiMet al.Effect of high Al2O3 slag on the blast furnace operations. ISIJ Int. 2008;48(4):420–429.
15.
KimHOzturkBFRJ.Slag-metal separation in the blast furnace trough. ISIJ Int. 1998;38(5):430–439.
16.
ShaoLXiaoQZhangCet al.Dead-man behavior in the blast furnace hearth—a brief review. Processes. 2020;8(11):1335.
17.
KondratievAJakEHayesPC.Predicting slag viscosities in metallurgical systems. Jom. 2002;54(11):41–45.
18.
LeeYSMinDJJungSMet al.Influence of basicity and FeO content on viscosity of blast furnace type slags containing FeO. ISIJ Int. 2004;44(8):1283–1290.
19.
HanCChenMZhangWet al.Viscosity model for iron blast furnace slags in SiO2–Al2O3–CaO–MgO system. Steel Res Int. 2015;86(6):678–685.
20.
SaitoNHoriNNakashimaKet al.Viscosity of blast furnace type slags. Metall Mater Trans B. 2003;34(5):509–516.
21.
SahooSKTiwariJNMishraBet al.Prediction of flow characteristics of Al2O3–CaO–MgO–SiO2–TiO2-type blast furnace slag and Its evaluation. Arab J Sci Eng. 2019;44(7):6393–6401.
22.
DienesGJ.Activation energy for viscous flow and short-range order. J Appl Phys. 1953;24(6):779–782.
23.
DengLZhangXZhangMet al.Effect of CaF2 on viscosity, structure and properties of CaO-Al2O3-MgO-SiO2 slag glass ceramics. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2018;500:310–316.
24.
FangJPangZXingXet al.Thermodynamic properties, viscosity, and structure of CaO–SiO2–MgO–Al2O3–TiO2–based slag. Materials (Basel). 2020;14(1):124.
25.
ZhangJJiaoKZhangJet al.Thermal stability of molten slag in blast furnace hearth. ISIJ Int. 2021;61(8):2227–2236.
26.
MillsK.The estimation of slag properties. South Afr Pyrometall. 2011;7(3):35–42.
27.
LiuWChenYWangJet al.Sulfide capacity of CaO–SiO2–MgO–Al2O3–BaO–Na2O slag at 1773K. J Sust Metall. 2021;7(3):1169–1177.
28.
ShatokhaV.Slag parameters and sulphur partition in blast furnace hearth: Ukrainian case and international comparison. Ironmak Steelmak. 2022;49(1):60–69.
29.
YadavUSDasBKBaijalAD. (2002). Sinter quality at Tata steel: past, present and future. In Proceedings of the Seminar on Raw Material Preparation for Metallurgical Industries: Problems and Solutions, April 8-9 2002 (p. 187). Allied Publishers.
30.
SrivastavaMPPanSKPrasadNet al.Characterization and processing of iron ore fines of kiriburu deposit of India. Int J Miner Process. 2001;61(2):93–107.
31.
MaulikSCBhattacharyyaKK. (2004). A beneficiation scheme for reduction of alumina in iron ores from Barsua.
32.
UpadhyayRKVenkateshAS.Current strategies and future challenges on exploration, beneficiation and value addition of iron ore resources with special emphasis on iron ores from eastern India. Appl Earth Sci. 2006;115(4):187–195.
33.
RoySDasAMohantyMK.Feasibility of producing pellet grade concentrate by beneficiation of iron ore slime in India. Sep Sci Technol. 2007;42(14):3271–3287.
34.
UpadhyayRKVenkateshASRoyS.Mineralogical characteristics of iron ores in Joda and Khondbond areas in Eastern India with implications on beneficiation. Res Geol. 2010;60(2):203–211.
35.
RoySDasA.Recovery of valuables from low-grade iron ore slime and reduction of waste volume by physical processing. Part Sci Technol. 2013;31(3):256–263.
36.
KumarDJainVRaiB.Can carboxymethyl cellulose be used as a selective flocculant for beneficiating alumina-rich iron ore slimes? A density functional theory and experimental study. Miner Eng. 2018;121:47–54.
37.
BiZLiKJiangCet al.Performance and transition mechanism from acidity to basicity of amphoteric oxides (Al2O3 and B2O3) in SiO2–CaO–Al2O3–B2O3 system: a molecular dynamics study. Ceram Int. 2021;47(9):12252–12260.
38.
TrasattiS.Work function, electronegativity, and electrochemical behaviour of metals: II. Potentials of zero charge and “electrochemical” work functions. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem. 1971;33(2):351–378.
39.
TiwaryJNSarkarSMishraBet al.Structural aspects of blast furnace slag. Emerg Mater Res. 2013;2(3):152–162.
40.
LvXYanZ.High-Temperature physicochemical properties of high alumina slag. In: High temperature physicochemical properties of high alumina blast furnace slag. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 77–102.
41.
XuRZhangJFanXet al.Effect of MnO on high-alumina slag viscosity and corrosion behavior of refractory in slags. ISIJ Int. 2017;57(11):1887–1894.
42.
CharguiFHamidoucheMBelhouchetHet al.Mullite fabrication from natural kaolin and aluminium slag. Boletín de la sociedad española de cerámica y vidrio. 2018;57(4):169–177.
43.
TalapaneniTYedlaNPalSet al.Experimental and theoretical studies on the viscosity–structure correlation for high alumina-silicate melts. Metall Mater Trans B. 2017;48(3):1450–1462.
44.
ZhangRZhangYLiuTet al.Effect of high alumina-based solid waste on efflorescence behavior of alkali-activated steel slag. Constr Build Mater. 2022;349:128804.
45.
WangSJiangYGuoYet al.Effects of basicity and Al2O3 content on viscosity and crystallization behavior of super-high-alumina slag. Crystals (Basel). 2022;12(6):851.
46.
ParkJHKimHMinDJ.Novel approach to link between viscosity and structure of silicate melts via Darken’s excess stability function: focus on the amphoteric behavior of alumina. Metall Mater Trans B. 2008;39(1):150–153.
47.
SunCYLiuXHLiJet al.Influence of Al2O3 and MgO on the viscosity and stability of CaO–MgO–SiO2–Al2O3 slags with CaO/SiO2 = 1.0. ISIJ Int. 2017;57(6):978–982.
48.
WangZSunYSridharSet al.Effect of Al2O3 on the viscosity and structure of CaO-SiO2-MgO-Al2O3-FetO slags. Metall Mater Trans B. 2015;46(2):537–541.
49.
LiaoJZhangYSridharSet al.Effect of Al2O3/SiO2 ratio on the viscosity and structure of slags. ISIJ Int. 2012;52(5):753–758.
50.
WangQZhangJLiuJet al.Thermal conduction mechanism based on microstructural transformations of molten slag: the role of calcium oxide. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2020;160:120167.
51.
MyselsKJ.The maximum bubble pressure method of measuring surface tension, revisited. Colloids Surf. 1990;43(2):241–262.
52.
ShankarAGörnerupMSeetharamanSet al.Sulfide capacity of high alumina blast furnace slags. Metall Mater Trans B. 2006;37(6):941–947.
53.
WangLWangYWangQet al.Raman structure investigations of CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-CrO x and its correlation with sulfide capacity. Metall Mater Trans B. 2016;47(1):10–15.
54.
GuoYShenFZhengHet al.Desulfurization ability of blast furnace slag containing high Al2O3 at 1773K. Crystals (Basel). 2021;11(8):910.
55.
HinoMNagasakaTKatsumataAet al.Simulation of primary-slag melting behavior in the cohesive zone of a blast furnace, considering the effect of Al2O3. Fe t O, and basicity in the sinter ore. Metall Mater Trans B. 1999;30(4):671–683.
56.
YaoLRenSWangXet al.Effect of Al2O3, MgO, and CaO/SiO2 on viscosity of high alumina blast furnace slag. Steel Res Int. 2016;87(2):241–249.
57.
LuLHRJMJR.Effects of alumina on sintering performance of hematite iron ores. ISIJ Int. 2007;47(3):349–358.
58.
UmadeviTDeodarAVMahapatraPCet al.Influence of alumina on iron ore sinter properties and productivity in the conventional and selective granulation sintering process. Steel Res Int. 2009;80(9):686–692.
59.
UmadeviTSahRMahapatraPC.Influence of sinter basicity (CaO/SiO2) on low and high alumina iron ore sinter quality. Min Proc Extractive Metall. 2014;123(2):75–85.
60.
MuwanguziAJKarasevAVByaruhangaJKet al.Characterization of chemical composition and microstructure of natural iron ore from Muko deposits. Int Sch Res Notices. 2012;2012:174803. 9 pages.
61.
AgrawalADasKSinghBKet al.Means to cope with the higher alumina burden in the blast furnace. Ironmak Steelmak. 2020;47(3):238–245.
62.
DynysFWHalloranJW.Alpha alumina formation in alum-derived gamma alumina. J Am Ceram Soc. 1982;65(9):442–448.
63.
FeretFRRoyDBoulangerC.Determination of alpha and beta alumina in ceramic alumina by X-ray diffraction. Spectrochim Acta Part B. 2000;55(7):1051–1061.
64.
RotoleJASherwoodPM.Gamma-alumina (γ-Al2O3) by XPS. Surf Sci Spectra. 1998;5(1):18–24.
65.
KiyoharaPKSantosHSCoelhoACVet al.Structure, surface area and morphology of aluminas from thermal decomposition of Al (OH)(CH3COO) 2 crystals. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2000;72:471–495.
66.
HashimotoHOnoderaYTaharaSet al.Structure of alumina glass. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–9.
67.
ShiCAldermanOLBermanDet al.The structure of amorphous and deeply supercooled liquid alumina. Front Mater. 2019;6:38.
68.
DippenaarR.Industrial uses of slag (the use and re-use of iron and steelmaking slags). Ironmak Steelmak. 2005;32(1):35–46.
69.
StuartNMSohlbergK.The microstructure of γ-alumina. Energies. 2021;14(20):6472.
70.
KovarikLBowdenMGencAet al.Structure of δ-alumina: toward the atomic level understanding of transition alumina phases. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118(31):18051–18058.
71.
ChandranCVKirschhockCERadhakrishnanSet al.Alumina: discriminative analysis using 3D correlation of solid-state NMR parameters. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48(1):134–156.
72.
KaurPKhannaAKaurNet al.Synthesis and structural characterization of alumina nanoparticles. Phase Trans. 2020;93(6):596–605.
73.
TavakoliAHMaramPSWidgeonSJet al.Amorphous alumina nanoparticles: structure, surface energy, and thermodynamic phase stability. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117(33):17123–17130.
74.
O’DellLASavinSLChadwickAVet al.Structural studies of silica-and alumina-pinned nanocrystalline SnO2. Nanotechnology. 2005;16(9):1836.
75.
SongKKimWParkSet al.Preparation of silica-alumina nanoparticles via blast-furnace slag dissolution in low-concentration acetic acid for carbonation. Minerals. 2017;7(11):206.
76.
WangSJiangYGuoYet al.Effects of basicity and Al2O3 content on viscosity and crystallization behavior of super-high-alumina slag. Crystals (Basel). 2022;12(6):851.
77.
XuRZZhangJLHanWXet al.Effect of BaO and Na2O on the viscosity and structure of blast furnace slag. Ironmak Steelmak. 2018;47:168–172.
78.
SiafakasDMatsushitaTHakamadaSet al.Measurement of viscosity of SiO2-CaO-Al2O3 slag in wide temperature range by aerodynamic levitation and rotating bob methods and sources of systematic error. Int J Microgravity Sci Appl. 2018;35(2):350204.
79.
ChebykinDHellerHPDubbersteinTet al.Viscosity measurement of slags using rotating bob and vibrating finger viscometer. ISIJ Int. 2017;57(8):1319–1326.
80.
SaitoNHoriNNakashimaKet al.Viscosity of blast furnace type slags. Metall Mater Trans B. 2003;34(5):509–516.
81.
TangXLZhangZTGuoMet al.Viscosities behavior of CaO-SiO2-MgO-Al2O3 slag with low mass ratio of CaO to SiO2 and wide range of A12O3 content. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2011;18(2):1–6.
82.
YaoLRenSLiuGet al.Study of the effect of the MgO/Al2O3 ratio on viscosity of blast furnace slag. Metall Res Technol. 2015;112(6):602.
83.
BianLGaoY.Influence of Al2O3, CaO/SiO2, and B2O3 on viscous behavior of high alumina and medium titania blast furnace slag. J Chem. 2017;2017:6895928. 6 pages.
84.
FukutakeTOkabeKO.Experimental studies of slag flow in the blast furnace hearth during tapping operation. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn.1976;16:309.
85.
SunaharaKNakanoKHoshiMet al.Effect of high Al2O3 slag on the blast furnace operations. ISIJ Int2008;48(4):420–429.
86.
LeeYSMinDJJungSMet al.Influence of basicity and FeO content on viscosity of blast furnace type slags containing FeO. ISIJ Int2004;44(8):1283–1290.
87.
HanC. (2017). Viscosity studies of high-temperature metallurgical slags relevant to ironmaking process.
88.
FengCChuMTangJet al.Effect of CaO/SiO2 and Al2O3 on viscous behaviors of the titanium-bearing blast furnace slag. Steel Res Int. 2016;87(10):1274–1283.
89.
DienesGJ.Activation energy for viscous flow and short-range order. J Appl Phys. 1953;24(6):779–782.
90.
DengLZhangXZhangMet al.Effect of CaF2 on viscosity, structure and properties of CaO-Al2O3-MgO-SiO2 slag glass ceramics. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2018;500:310–316.
91.
FangJPangZXingXet al.Thermodynamic properties, viscosity, and structure of CaO–SiO2–MgO–Al2O3–TiO2–based slag. Materials (Basel). 2020;14(1):124.
92.
TangXLZhangZTGuoMet al.Viscosities behavior of CaO-SiO2-MgO-Al2O3 slag with low mass ratio of CaO to SiO2 and wide range of A12O3 content. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2011;18(2):1–6.
93.
JiangXZhangHYZhengHYet al.Three-segment control theory of MgO/Al2O3 ratio based on viscosity experiments and phase diagram analyses at 1500° C. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2020;27(6):624–630.
94.
ZhangJWangCJiaoKet al.Effect of BaO and MnO on high-temperature properties and structure of blast furnace slag. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2021;571:121066.
95.
ParkHParkJYKimGHet al.Effect of TiO2 on the viscosity and slag structure in blast furnace type slags. steel Res Int. 2012;83(2):150–156.
96.
ChenMZhangDKouMet al.Viscosities of iron blast furnace slags. ISIJ Int. 2014;54(9):2025–2030.
97.
LiTSunCSongSet al.Influences of Al2O3 and TiO2Content on viscosity and structure of CaO–8% MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–TiO2–5% FeO blast furnace primary slag. Metals (Basel). 2019;9(7):743.
98.
GanLLaiC.A general viscosity model for molten blast furnace slag. Metall Mater Trans B. 2014;45(3):875–888.
99.
KimHKimWHSohnIet al.The effect of MgO on the viscosity of the CaO-SiO2-20 wt% Al2O3-MgO slag system. steel Res Int. 2010;81(4):261–264.
100.
XingXPangZZhengJet al.Effect of MgO and K2O on high-Al silicon–manganese alloy slag viscosity and structure. Minerals. 2020;10(9):810.
101.
YanZLvXZhangJet al.Influence of MgO, Al2O3 and CaO/SiO2 on the viscosity of blast furnace type slag with high Al2O3 and 5 wt-% TiO2. Can Metall Q. 2016;55(2):186–194.
102.
DasKAgrawalAReddyASet al.Factsage studies to identify the optimum slag regime for blast furnace operation. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2021;74(2):419–428.
103.
ChangZYJiaoKXZhangJLet al.Experimental investigation of relationship between enthalpy change and viscosity in blast furnace type slags. ISIJ Int. 2019;59(1):39–45.
104.
ShankarAGörnerupMLahiriAKet al.Estimation of viscosity for blast furnace type slags. Ironmak Steelmak. 2007;34(6):477–481.
105.
BabenkoAAIstominSAProtopopovEVet al.Viscosity of CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO-B2O3 slags. Steel Transl. 2014;44(2):110–112.
106.
GhoshDKrishnamurthyVASankaranarayananSR.Application of optical basicity to viscosity of high alumina blast furnace slags. J Min Metall Sect B. 2010;46(1):41–49.
107.
YanZPangZLvXWet al. Effect of TiO2 on the viscous behavior of high alumina blast furnace slag. In: TMS annual meeting & exhibitionCham: Springer; March. p. 725–733.
108.
JiaoKZhangJWangZet al.Melting features and viscosity of TiO2-containing primary slag in a blast furnace. High Temp Mater Processes. 2018;37(2):149–156.
109.
XuRZZhangJLMaRYet al.Influence of TiO2 on the viscosity of a high alumina slag and on carbon brick corrosion. Steel Res Int. 2018;89(3):1700353.
110.
ZhangXJiangTXueXet al.Influence of MgO/Al2O3 ratio on viscosity of blast furnace slag with high Al2O3 content. Steel Res Int. 2016;87(1):87–94.
111.
YanZLvXLiangDet al.Transition of blast furnace slag from silicates-based to aluminates-based: viscosity. Metall Mater Trans B. 2017;48(2):1092–1099.
112.
LiuHQinYYangYet al.Influence of Al2O3 content on the melting and fluidity of blast furnace type slag with low TiO2 content. J Chem. 2018;2018:1–6.
113.
SiafakasDMatsushitaTJarforsAEWet al.Viscosity of SiO2–CaO–Al2O3 slag with low silica–influence of CaO/Al2O3, SiO2/Al2O3 ratio. ISIJ Int. 2018;58(12):2180–2185.
114.
XuCYWangCXuRZet al.Effect of Al2O3 on the viscosity of CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO-Cr2O3 slags. Int J Miner Metall Mater. 2021;28(5):797–803.
115.
XuRZZhangJLWangZYet al.Influence of Cr2O3 and B2O3 on viscosity and structure of high alumina slag. steel Res Int. 2017;88(4):1600241.
116.
GaoYBianLLiangZ.Influence of B2O3 and TiO2 on viscosity of titanium-bearing blast furnace slag. steel Res Int. 2015;86(4):386–390.
