Due to its excellent metallurgical properties, Coherent Jet Oxygen Lance gradually replaces the traditional supersonic oxygen lance. This study is based on the traditional coherent jet oxygen lance that uses natural gas as the ring combustion gas and uses hydrogen as the gas to replace it. Numerical simulation is used to explore the basic characteristics and laws of hydrogen–oxygen coherent jet injection. Based on the fluid theory, the geometric parameters of the hydrogen–oxygen coherent jet oxygen lance are obtained through strict mathematical derivation. A systematic study of the mixture of hydrogen and natural gas as fuel gas was carried out, and the results were analysed in detail. This study is the first to clarify the application mechanism of hydrogen as a gas in the coherent jet oxygen lance, provide a reference for the injection parameters of EAFand expand the research direction of hydrogen energy in the field of steelmaking.
PostWMPengT-HEmanuelWRet al.The global carbon cycle. Am Sci. 1990;78(4):310–326.
3.
XuK.Low carbon economy and steel industry. Iron Steel. 2010;45(03):1–12.
4.
EdwardsPPKuznetsovVDavidWI.Hydrogen energy. Philos Trans R Soc A Math, Phys Eng Sci. 2007;365(1853):1043–1056.
5.
VoglVAmanMNilssonLJ.Assessment of hydrogen direct reduction for fossil-free steelmaking. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;203:736–745.
6.
MathurPC.Coherent jets in steelmaking: principles and learnings. Indianapolis: Praxair Metals Technologies; 2004.
7.
HarrisCHolmesGFerriMBet al. AISTech—Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceeding,Springer, Cleveland, 2006, pp. 483–90.
8.
WorrellEPriceLMartinN.Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the US iron and steel sector. Energy. 2001;26(5):513–536.
9.
SumiIKishimotoYKikuchiYet al.Effect of high-temperature field on supersonic oxygen jet behavior. ISIJ Int. 2006;46(9):1312–1317.
10.
AlamMNaserJBrooksGet al.Computational fluid dynamics modeling of supersonic coherent jets for electric arc furnace steelmaking process. Metall Mater Trans B. 2010;41(6):1354–1367.
11.
LiuFSunDZhuRet al.Effect of shrouding CH4 flow rate on flow field and stirring ability of coherent jet in steelmaking process. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1613.
12.
LiuFSunDZhuRet al.Characteristics of flow field for supersonic oxygen multijets with various Laval nozzle structures. Metall Mater Trans B. 2019;50(5):2362–2376.
13.
TangGChenYSilaen AKet al.Effects of fuel input on coherent jet length at various surrounding temperatures. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;153:513–523.
14.
WeiGZhuRWuXet al.Study on the fluid flow characteristics of coherent jets with CO2 and O2 mixed injection in electric arc furnace steelmaking processes. Metall Mater Trans B. 2018;49(3):1405–1420.
15.
MathurPMessinaC.Praxair CoJet™ technology–Principles and actual results from recent installations. AISE Steel Technol. 2001;78(5):21–25.
16.
HirtCWNicholsBD.Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys1981;39:201–205.
17.
WilcoxDC.Turbulence modelling for CFD. La Canada (CA): DCW Industries; 1998.
18.
MardaniATabejamaatSGhamariM.Numerical study of influence of molecular diffusion in the Mild combustion regime. Combust Theor Model2010;14:747–774.
19.
ChristoFCDallyBB.Modeling turbulent reacting jets issuing into a hot and diluted coflow. Combust Flame. 2005;142:117–129.
20.
LaunderBESpaldingDB.Lectures in mathematical model of turbulence. London: Academic Press; 1972, p. 124.
21.
WangFMiJLiPet al.Diffusion flame of a CH4/H2 jet in hot low-oxygen coflow. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2011;36:9267–9277.
22.
LaunderBESpaldingDB.Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence. London: Academic; 1972.
23.
GallettiCParenteATognottiL.Numerical and experimental investigation of a mild combustion burner. Combust Flame. 2007;151:649–664.
24.
LiuFZhuRDongKet al.Flow field characteristics of coherent Jet with preheating oxygen under various ambient temperatures. ISIJ Int2016;56:1519–1528.
25.
SarkarSBalakrishnanL. Application of a Reynolds-stress turbulence model to the compressible shear layer, ICASE Report 90-18NASA CR 182002, 1990.
26.
PopeSB.Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation. Combust Theor Model. 1997;1:41–63.
27.
MenterFKuntzMBenderR. A scale-adaptive simulation model for turbulent flow predictions. 41st aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. 2003:767.
28.
ChuiEHRaithGD.Computation of radiant heat transfer on a nonorthogonal mesh using the finite-volume method. Numer Heat Transf B Fundam.1993;23:269–288.
29.
MathieuJScottJ.An introduction to turbulent flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
30.
WangJHuangZTangCet al.Numerical study of the effect of hydrogen addition on methane–air mixtures combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34(2):1084–1096.
31.
LawCWeiguangshenK.Combustion physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
32.
KatohAOyamaHKitagawaKet al.Visualization of OH radical distribution in a methane-hydrogen mixture flame by isotope shift/planar laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy. Combust Sci Technol. 2006;178(12):2061–2074.
33.
NguyenQ-VPaulPH. The time evolution of a vortex-flame interaction observed via planar imaging of CH and OH. Twenty-Sixth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, pp. 357–364; 1996.
